Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال کورعباسلو | کوراباز

Channel

کانال کورعباسلو | کوراباز

@kurabaz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,504subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001004082972
TypeChannel
Username@kurabaz
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kurabaz

Growth

2,5042,5082,5065 August 2026 — 2,507 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,506 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,506 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,508 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,504 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,503–2,509 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:072,504-4
12 Aug 2026, 11:382,508+2
6 Aug 2026, 05:342,506no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:502,506-1
5 Aug 2026, 18:472,507first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.60%
avg views ÷ 2,504 subscribers
Avg views / post
190
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held40 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,615
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 02s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3159.6%
😡1019.2%
47.69%
👏23.85%
🤝23.85%
👍11.92%
👎11.92%
😱11.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC37 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔴 محمد عطریانفر روزنامه‌نگار و عضو شورای مرکزی حزب کارگزاران سازندگی ایران در مصاحبه با انتخاب گفت: پوست آقای قالیباف به اندازه‌ای کافی کلفت است که خیلی نگران اهانت تندروها به خود بابت مذاکره و توافق نیست. 🆔 @kurabaz 🔷 🆔 @kurabazkanal ✅ #کانال‌کورعباسلو‌کوراباز 🇮🇷

7 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC61 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 شرکت برجسته نفتی امارات: ۱۵ شناور ما در جنگ علیه ایران آسیب دید 🔹 شرکت ادنوک، غول نفتی امارات اعلام کرد که از زمان آغاز جنگ علیه ایران، ۱۵ فروند از شناورهای این شرکت با موشک یا پهپاد مورد اصابت قرار گرفته‌اند 🆔 @kurabaz 🔷 🆔 @kurabazkanal ✅ #کانال‌کورعباسلو‌کوراباز 🇮🇷

7 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC62 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔴 نیروهای یمنی بار دیگر با ۳ موشک و ۲ پهپاد، مواضع نیروهای تحت حمایت عربستان در شمال مارب/یمن را هدف قرار دادند. 🆔 @kurabaz 🔷 🆔 @kurabazkanal ✅ #کانال‌کورعباسلو‌کوراباز 🇮🇷

7 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC63 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 شاخص فلاکت در کشور از ۱۹ درصد در سال ۱۳۹۵ به ۹۷/۷ درصد در سال ۱۴۰۵ رسید. 🔹این آمار نشان می‌دهد که فشار اقتصادی بشدت بر روی زندگی مردم افزایش پیدا کرده است و آنها به سرعت در حال فقیر شدن هستند. 🆔 @kurabaz 🔷 🆔 @kurabazkanal ✅ #کانال‌کورعباسلو‌کوراباز 🇮🇷

7 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC71 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔴 تصاویر جدید منتشر شده از دوربین‌های امنیتی، لحظه‌ای را نشان می‌دهد که زلزله‌ای به بزرگی ۶/۸ (در مقیاس ریشتر) در ۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ (۲۸ ژوئیه ۲۰۲۶) بیمارستان عمومی کوماموتو را در ژاپن لرزاند. 🔹 در زمان وقوع زمین‌لرزه، چهار عمل جراحی در حال انجام بود. 🔹 ویدیوی ثبت‌شده توسط دوربین امنیتی یکی از اتاق‌های عمل، که در آن یک جراحی شکم در جریان بود، نشان می‌دهد که کارکنان پزشکی در حالی که تجهیزات به شدت تکان می‌خورد، با بدن خود

7 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC76 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 روزنامهٔ آمریکایی نیویورک تایمز ادعا کرد: بازرسان سازمان ملل ارزیابی کرده اند که ذخیره اورانیوم جمهوری اسلامی ایران برای ساخت ۱۰ بمب هسته‌ای کافیست! 🆔 @kurabaz 🔷 🆔 @kurabazkanal ✅ #کانال‌کورعباسلو‌کوراباز 🇮🇷

😡1

7 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

سیدمحمدعلی ابطحی: حرفهای باقرخرازی، افتتاح شعبه رسمی حکومت اسلامی داعش است [عصر ایران] 🆔 @kurabaz 🔷 🆔 @kurabazkanal ✅ #کانال‌کورعباسلو‌کوراباز 🇮🇷

👍1😁1

7 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC98 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ادعای وزیر خزانه‌داری آمریکا: به زودی شاهد توافق با ایران خواهیم بود 🆔 @kurabaz 🔷 🆔 @kurabazkanal ✅ #کانال‌کورعباسلو‌کوراباز 🇮🇷

😁1

7 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC98 viewsread 7 August 2026

ترامپ: قیمت نفت فقط در صورتی افزایش می‌یابد که مجبور به حمله دیگری به ایران شویم 🆔 @kurabaz 🔷 🆔 @kurabazkanal ✅ #کانال‌کورعباسلو‌کوراباز 🇮🇷

7 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC120 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌹 به نیت #احسان_اموات *جناب آقای #جعفر_پناهی مبلغ ۱۰٫۰۰۰٫۰۰۰ ریال به صندوق #انجمن_آبادگران_کورعباسلو اهدا کرده و ثواب این عمل خیر را به روح تمامی اموات مخصوصاً شادروانان : 🔲 حاجیه خانم صدیقه نجف زاده 🔲 حاجیه خانم ربابه قاسمی 🔲 مهناز پناهی تقدیم نمودند. 🤲 انجمن آبادگران کورعباسلو ضمن سپاس از این اقدام نیک، برای آن مرحومین رحمت و آمرزش الهی و برای بازماندگان سلامتی، آرامش و شکیبایی آرزومند است. 📖 لطفاً برای ش

1

7 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC127 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 بلومبرگ: درآمد خارجی کره شمالی چهار برابر شده است 🔹بلومبرگ گزارش داد کیم جونگ اون، رهبر کره شمالی، با وجود تحریم‌های گسترده بین‌المللی اکنون بیش از هر زمان دیگری در ۱۵ سال حکومت خود به منابع مالی دسترسی دارد. 🔹بر اساس این گزارش، کره شمالی بین سال‌های ۲۰۲۲ تا ۲۰۲۵ تا ۲۲ میلیارد دلار درآمد خارجی کسب کرده که تقریبا چهار برابر دوره چهارساله پیش از آن است. بخش بزرگی از این افزایش پس از حمله روسیه به اوکراین رخ داده و

1

7 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC139 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 اسکات بسنت، وزیر خزانه‌داری آمریکا، درباره جمهوری اسلامی ایران گفت: ایران با تورم ۱۵۰ تا ۱۸۰ درصدی مواد غذایی و ناتوانی در پرداخت حقوق نیروهای نظامی مواجه است. 🔹وی ادامه داد: فکر می‌کنم به‌زودی، شاید حتی امروز یا فردا، شاهد یک توافق خواهیم بود؛ یک آتش‌بس ۳۰ تا ۶۰ روزه، و تنگه هرمز باز خواهد شد. 🆔 @kurabaz 🔷 🆔 @kurabazkanal ✅ #کانال‌کورعباسلو‌کوراباز 🇮🇷

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @kurabaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 44,894 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

حوادث روز
@havades_roz · 244,930
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال کورعباسلو | کوراباز” (@kurabaz), 2,504 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kurabaz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.