您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-26 【老师】:金条 【评价人】:匿名用户 人照评分:9.8 颜值评分:9.8 身材评分:9.8 服务评分:10 态度评分:10 环境评分:9.0 综合评分:9.73 过程描述:态度非常好的妹妹 是否推荐:是 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|

Channel
昆明街坊茶话会报告专榜💕
@kunmingmybgb01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
958subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003161882818 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kunmingmybgb01 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kunmingmybgb01 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:08 | 958 | +33 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 925 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 926 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 926 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.7%
- avg views ÷ 958 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 131
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.22%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 August 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,626 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-25 【老师】:金条 【评价人】:匿名用户 人照评分:9.8 颜值评分:10 身材评分:9 服务评分:10 态度评分:10 环境评分:9 综合评分:9.63 过程描述:探路者来了!首先说明一点,课表上没毒龙,但是因为我的骗术,没加一分钱给毒龙了!其次,这个老师不太懂拒绝,也嘴接了尿,老师性格温柔的很,人照差不多,M属性明显。你们轻点对待,别搞上岸了 是否推荐:是 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-25 【老师】:奇瓜 【评价人】:匿名用户 人照评分:10 颜值评分:10 身材评分:10 服务评分:9 态度评分:9 环境评分:9 综合评分:9.5 过程描述:北方ls来昆明短开,人照一致,有幸约到,颜值拉满,叫声悦耳,很爽的一次体验… 是否推荐:是 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-25 【老师】:小芳 【评价人】:匿名用户 人照评分:9 颜值评分:9 身材评分:9 服务评分:9 态度评分:9 环境评分:8 综合评分:8.83 过程描述:教室在巫家坝,停车方便,ls嫩妹一枚很可爱,jk制服很诱人,人照一致,165左右,🐻B,口活不错,骚水爆多,还会无限回锅… 是否推荐:是 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
❤1
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-25 【老师】:小阿包 【评价人】:匿名用户 人照评分:9 颜值评分:9 身材评分:9 服务评分:9 态度评分:9 环境评分:9 综合评分:9 过程描述:ls很漂亮很可爱,服务态度很好,配合度高,推荐兄弟们,还会回锅 是否推荐:是 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-24 【老师】:瑾璱 【评价人】:匿名用户 人照评分:9 颜值评分:9.5 身材评分:9 服务评分:10 态度评分:10 环境评分:10 综合评分:9.58 过程描述:老师上次来没约上,终于今天老师又来昆明了,赶紧跟老师约课,运气好,刚好老师有🈳!迫不及待的奔向老师,住处很好找,有门禁也安全,老师帮我按了电梯上楼,进门一眼惊艳到我,老师穿个红色连衣裙,很耀眼的那种红,典型的BBW!身材绝了!🐻大屁股也大,迫不及待的把老师拉到浴室,老师帮忙洗了个残废澡……后面的就不过多描述了哦,我自己享受……想体验的兄弟们抓紧cj,自己体验哦, 不得不说老师服务真的顶……水多逼紧……口活也一流 是否推荐:是 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-24 【老师】:金条(可三通) 【评价人】:匿名用户 人照评分:10 颜值评分:10 身材评分:10 服务评分:10 态度评分:10 环境评分:10 综合评分:10 过程描述:测试机器人 是否推荐:是 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-24 【老师】:小芳 【评价人】:Seller 人照评分:10 颜值评分:9 身材评分: 服务评分: 态度评分: 环境评分: 综合评分:9.5 过程描述: 是否推荐: ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-24 【老师】:栀栀 【评价人】:匿名用户 人照评分:10 颜值评分:9 身材评分:9 服务评分:9.5 态度评分:10 环境评分:9.5 综合评分:9.5 过程描述:看到老师打广告就约的尾课,到了指定地方遥控上楼,进门一看人照可以说基本无差,在飞机上很少遇到这种人照无差别的老师。进门闲聊了一会,然后一起洗了个澡,进入房间,喊老师换了女仆装,开始大🐍特🐍,真的很有女友感,课表上该有的服务都有,口的也很服务。时间也晚了,遂提出戴上套套开凿,日感很好,很润,换了几个姿势,最后后入出货,随时很晚了结束了老师也没催,洗洗澡抽了一支烟,穿穿衣服愉快的回家!会回锅的。 是否推荐:是 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
❤1
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-23 【老师】:小芳 【评价人】:匿名用户 人照评分:7.5 颜值评分:7.5 身材评分:7.5 服务评分:0 态度评分:5 环境评分:7 综合评分:5.75 过程描述:人照基本没啥问题,关键说说服务。我也不知道频道里面的好评是怎么得来的。完全没啥服务,日的时候跟个死鱼一样。一点声音没有 是否推荐:否 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-23 【老师】:初雪 【评价人】:Helencat73 人照评分:10 颜值评分:9.9 身材评分:9.8 服务评分:9.9 态度评分:10 环境评分:10 综合评分:9.93 过程描述:老师确实是嫩妹 不是嬢嬢 叫床很好听 还很配合 颜值也确实不错 长得挺好看的 胸虽然没有多大 但很挺 捏着感觉挺好 不错 值得推荐 是否推荐:是 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
您好欢迎投稿《昆明街坊茶话会群》出击报告 【时间】:2026-08-23 【老师】:栀栀 【评价人】:雨中漫步 人照评分:9.5 颜值评分:9.5 身材评分:9 服务评分:10 态度评分:10 环境评分:9 综合评分:9.5 过程描述:从群里看到栀栀老师的照片,是我喜欢的类型,马上联系出击,联系上老师,确定地址和时间后立即出发,很快就到了老师的教室。遥控上楼后,见到了栀栀老师后,的确和照片一样年轻漂亮,然后聊了会,洗完澡开始进入正题,老师的🐍很好,很认真,很细致,很舒服,女友感太强了。最后戴上TT,一边🐍一边做,很快 123 就交枪了,还会回锅 是否推荐:是 ✅管理员已核实相关凭证 点击文字可进入相关领域: |💌聊天群|💌公开榜|💌车评榜|
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kunmingmybgb01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“昆明街坊茶话会报告专榜💕” (@kunmingmybgb01), 958 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kunmingmybgb01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.