Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کصتامینوفن

Channel

کصتامینوفن

@kostamini

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,026subscribers

+4,646 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001848411665
TypeChannel
Username@kostamini
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kostamini

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,86631,70627,78613 August 2026 — 24,380 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,285 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,173 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,085 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,026 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,980 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,951 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,866 subscribers22 August 2026 — 25,178 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27,074 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,484 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,017 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,877 subscribers28 August 2026 — 31,343 subscribers29 August 2026 — 31,483 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31,209 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,938 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,734 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,514 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,259 subscribers6 September 2026 — 29,931 subscribers9 September 2026 — 29,885 subscribers11 September 2026 — 30,690 subscribers13 September 2026 — 30,978 subscribers15 September 2026 — 31,166 subscribers17 September 2026 — 31,320 subscribers25 September 2026 — 31,706 subscribers4 October 2026 — 31,234 subscribers8 October 2026 — 30,650 subscribers13 October 2026 — 30,156 subscribers14 October 2026 — 30,009 subscribers15 October 2026 — 29,912 subscribers16 October 2026 — 29,818 subscribers17 October 2026 — 29,714 subscribers18 October 2026 — 29,613 subscribers19 October 2026 — 29,518 subscribers20 October 2026 — 29,429 subscribers21 October 2026 — 29,316 subscribers22 October 2026 — 29,250 subscribers23 October 2026 — 29,179 subscribers24 October 2026 — 29,095 subscribers25 October 2026 — 29,026 subscribers29,02613 August 202625 October 2026
42 measurements spanning 73 days, net +4,646. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,690–32,882 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 21:2029,026-69
24 Oct 2026, 23:1629,095-84
23 Oct 2026, 22:0529,179-71
22 Oct 2026, 21:0529,250-66
21 Oct 2026, 20:1129,316-113
20 Oct 2026, 15:1629,429-89
19 Oct 2026, 14:1629,518-95
18 Oct 2026, 12:1629,613-101
17 Oct 2026, 11:1129,714-104
16 Oct 2026, 11:5829,818-94
15 Oct 2026, 14:5529,912-97
14 Oct 2026, 12:0030,009-147
13 Oct 2026, 00:5030,156-494
8 Oct 2026, 15:5930,650-584
4 Oct 2026, 04:1831,234-472
25 Sept 2026, 08:3731,706+386
17 Sept 2026, 06:4131,320+154
15 Sept 2026, 10:0031,166+188
13 Sept 2026, 17:4130,978+288
11 Sept 2026, 20:5730,690first reading

Engagement

1,135 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 118 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.86%
avg views ÷ 29,026 subscribers
Avg views / post
540
616 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
616
of 1,135 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 414 of 616 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held1,135 (12 August 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total332,725
Reactions total4,101
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Oct 2026, 18:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 10m
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 195 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,433 reactions across 720 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣3,65243.3%
❤1,75020.8%
👍1,73920.6%
😐7919.38%
👎3183.77%
🔥1832.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 733 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,433 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kostamini. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 25 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Oct 2026, 16:54 UTC164 views2 reactionsread 25 October 2026

‏خیلی اینترنت آزاد و باکیفیتی در اختیارمونه، ‏تعرفه‌اش هم افزایش میدن. @kostamini | کصتامینوفن

👍2

25 Oct 2026, 16:52 UTC160 viewsread 25 October 2026

⚽️ شرط بندی میکنی ولی ضرر میکنی ؟ ‼️ تا الان هرچی شرط بستی فقط پول از دست دادی؟! داخل کانال مکس بت عضو شید ، فرم های خوبی میزاره و درصد بردش هم بالاس👇 ✈️ t.me/+tZg-XO_gkNcxMDBk ✈️ t.me/+tZg-XO_gkNcxMDBk

25 Oct 2026, 16:52 UTC159 viewsread 25 October 2026
Photo

🇪🇸فرم Vip 🇪🇸 بارسلونا - رئال مادرید🇪🇸 باضریب ⬅️ 1.82📊 گذاشتم اینجا حتما استفاده کنید 100 درصد وینه 🔥 خودم 💰70.000.000 میلیون زدم روش😐🔥 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 🚫 دریافت فرم خفن از‌ کانال ⬇️ G3 🔵 t.me/+tZg-XO_gkNcxMDBk ◀️ 🔵 t.me/+tZg-XO_gkNcxMDBk ◀️

25 Oct 2026, 16:31 UTC193 views3 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

ده کشوری که معتقدن مرداشون تاکسیکه با حضور پرافتخار ایران در جایگاه اول.... @kostamini | کصتامینوفن

👎2👍1

25 Oct 2026, 15:35 UTC288 viewsread 25 October 2026

اینترنت گرون شده،قصد ازدواج نداری پیام نده. @kostamini | کصتامینوفن

25 Oct 2026, 14:33 UTC348 views10 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

این زن بعد از ۲۲۱ رابطه‌ی شکست‌خورده و ۴ نامزدی بهم خورده، با سگ ۶ ساله‌اش ازدواج می‌کند و می‌گه اعتمادش را به مردها از دست داده. @kostamini | کصتامینوفن

😐8❤1👎1

25 Oct 2026, 13:34 UTC404 views25 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

تو سبزوار این پیرمرد ۸۳ ساله بعد پنجاه سال زندگی مشترک با زنش نتونست بچه دار شه؛ الان رفته با این خانم ۳۰ ساله ازدواج کرده و الان بچه دار شدن =))) @kostamini | کصتامینوفن

😐17🤣5👎3

25 Oct 2026, 12:31 UTC463 views10 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

🔴 رکورد بازدید اینستاگرام شکسته شد! یه میمون توی هند، از بس غمگین و تنها بوده، میره داخل یه مغازه و فروشنده رو در آغوش میگیره🫂 این کلیپ تو ۲۴ ساعت، بیش از ۳۰۰ میلیون بازدید خورده و رکورد بازدید اینستاگرام رو شکسته! @kostamini | کصتامینوفن

👍7❤3

25 Oct 2026, 11:32 UTC493 views16 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

نور از زخم هایمان وارد میشود. @kostamini | کصتامینوفن

🤣15❤1

25 Oct 2026, 10:33 UTC494 views11 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

🔴 اگه هممون مثل ایشون امید به زندگی داشتیم، ایران گلستون میشد؛ حاجی با 85 سال سن نشسته جلوی دکتر میگه مشکل نعوظ دارم (شومبولم راست نمیشه)، درستش کن برام. @kostamini | کصتامینوفن

🤣11

25 Oct 2026, 09:26 UTC516 views16 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

=))))))) @kostamini | کصتامینوفن

👍16

25 Oct 2026, 09:25 UTC480 viewsread 25 October 2026
File

✈️ اپلیکیشن MelBet 🥇 🎁 کد هدیه 100 دلاری: Sport100 🔒 برای تعیین رمز ورود حداقل از 8 کاراکتر و حروف بزرگ و کوچک انگلیسی و اعداد انگلیسی استفاده کنید، مانند Hamid120 🇮🇷 برای تغییر زبان برنامه، زبان موبایل خود را تغییر دهید. ✅ ورود به اپلیکیشن بدون فیلترشکن

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,135 posts we hold for @kostamini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کانال رسمی betfido
@betfidomi · 32,896
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
خبر لحظه ای
@akhbar_lahzei_iran · 68,420
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کصتامینوفن” (@kostamini), 29,026 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kostamini.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.