Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Konza.pro Академія

Channel

Konza.pro Академія

@konza_pro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,246subscribers

-322 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001319661919
TypeChannel
Username@konza_pro
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 24 October 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/konza_pro

Growth

1,2461,5681,40719 August 2026 — 1,568 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,568 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,545 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,390 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,329 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,298 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,281 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,269 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,246 subscribers19 August 20269 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 21 days, net -322. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,198–1,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 04:411,246-23
3 Sept 2026, 10:161,269-12
31 Aug 2026, 06:341,281-17
27 Aug 2026, 22:341,298-31
25 Aug 2026, 03:431,329-61
22 Aug 2026, 07:391,390-155
19 Aug 2026, 05:541,545-23
19 Aug 2026, 01:451,568no change
19 Aug 2026, 01:301,568first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 October 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.0%
avg views ÷ 1,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
461
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.515%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 October 202018 August 2026)
Views total1,384
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
555.6%
👎333.3%
💩111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2020 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC414 viewsread 19 August 2026
Poll

Я буду навчатись і працювати на:

  1. Комп'ютер55%
  2. Планшет9%
  3. Телефон (айфон, андроід та ін)91%

The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC424 views0 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Вітаю. Потрібно узнати у вас на чому ви збираєтесь начатись і працювати. Пройдіть будь ласка опитування

17 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC546 views5 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Привіт народ! Робити курс на тему як робити AI контент, а потім другий, як на тому контенті заробляти? 😎 Курси, якщо шо, будуть безкоштовні і якісні 😉

5

8 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,020 views1 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Забув добаити, що тут також буде про те як на цьому ФШ можно заробляти і знайти собі робоу

💩1

7 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,100 views3 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Вітаємо усіх! Оголошення. Ми міняємо формат нашої групи. тут більше не буде вакансій, але буде все про створення AI контенту: відео і зображень. Так що кому цікаво, то залишайтесь з нами 😊

👎3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @konza_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

Я буду навчатись і працювати на:

  1. Комп'ютер55%
  2. Планшет9%
  3. Телефон (айфон, андроід та ін)91%

The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2020 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🐿 Білка Знає I Біла Церква Новини
@bilkaznaie · 31,129
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 6 September 2026
Біла Церква Підслухано
@mistodobra · 87,186
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Konza.pro Академія” (@konza_pro), 1,246 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konza_pro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.