Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Konfi

Channel

Konfi

@konfikonfi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,317subscribers

-197 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040639185
TypeChannel
Username@konfikonfi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/konfikonfi

Growth

10,31710,51410,415.57 August 2026 — 10,514 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,512 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,509 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,499 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,492 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,485 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,478 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,464 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,460 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,454 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,447 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,444 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,430 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,420 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,409 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,388 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,365 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,356 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,353 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,347 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,335 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,331 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,317 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 23 days, net -197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,287–10,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 17:4610,317-14
29 Aug 2026, 17:1410,331-4
28 Aug 2026, 14:0410,335-12
27 Aug 2026, 15:2610,347-6
26 Aug 2026, 17:5710,353-3
25 Aug 2026, 20:5310,356-9
24 Aug 2026, 21:0310,365-23
23 Aug 2026, 08:5810,388-21
21 Aug 2026, 17:2810,409-11
20 Aug 2026, 15:2210,420-10
19 Aug 2026, 17:4510,430-14
18 Aug 2026, 19:0210,444-3
17 Aug 2026, 19:5410,447-7
16 Aug 2026, 15:4610,454-6
15 Aug 2026, 00:3410,460-4
13 Aug 2026, 18:0810,464-14
12 Aug 2026, 15:1610,478-7
11 Aug 2026, 17:1710,485-7
10 Aug 2026, 15:4310,492-7
9 Aug 2026, 19:0310,499first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 10,317 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,250
Reactions total92
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,954 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,17560.1%
❤‍🔥41121.0%
🔥1276.50%
custom 52805980549011457621125.73%
💔713.63%
🌚281.43%
👍150.768%
🙏150.768%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,954reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @konfikonfi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC≈1,130 views44 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DblpLluqUf4/?igsh=MXZ4em1hOTFwYzF6Nw==

❤‍🔥338custom 52805980549011457623

4 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC≈1,120 views48 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Новый сниппет кстати

❤‍🔥387custom 52805980549011457623

25 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC≈2,120 views61 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Тюмень, сегодня у вас выступаю, если вылечу🙃

52🔥5❤‍🔥3custom 52805980549011457621

25 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC≈2,140 views65 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Просто угадайте, кто опять застрял в аэропорту)

45❤‍🔥10🌚9custom 52805980549011457621

19 Jul 2026, 22:19 UTC≈3,630 views121 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Испанцы мои родныеее

94💔13❤‍🔥12custom 52805980549011457622

19 Jul 2026, 20:21 UTC≈3,010 views110 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Я фанат Джастина Бибера!

75❤‍🔥20custom 528059805490114576214💔1

19 Jul 2026, 17:23 UTC≈3,060 views130 reactionsread 29 August 2026

С детства за Испанию🇪🇸 Из-за них я полюбил футбол Но в то же время с детства за Месси🇪🇸 Сегодня единственный матч, когда я буду рад любым исходам И в том и в другом случае это будет история… Шикарный матч нас ждет! А вы за кого?

94custom 528059805490114576219❤‍🔥16🔥1

12 Jul 2026, 21:38 UTC≈3,220 views80 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

59🔥13❤‍🔥6custom 52805980549011457622

12 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC≈2,800 views56 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Как думаете, улечу сегодня в Москву или нет?

  1. Да43%
  2. Ты теперь житель нижнекамска65%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

34custom 528059805490114576211❤‍🔥9🔥2

12 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC≈2,530 views84 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Если вы думаете, что я вылетел - нет🙂 я еще в аэропорту…

💔4921🙏7❤‍🔥5🌚1custom 52805980549011457621

12 Jul 2026, 04:03 UTC≈2,390 views92 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Может рубрику открыть: Застреваем в аэропортах с Мишей Konfuz

68❤‍🔥15🌚8custom 52805980549011457621

12 Jul 2026, 03:56 UTC≈2,260 views77 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Снова застрял в аэропорту На этот раз в нижнекамске🫠🫠🫠

57❤‍🔥12🙏7custom 52805980549011457621

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @konfikonfi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTCAnonymous Poll297 voters

Как думаете, улечу сегодня в Москву или нет?

  1. Да43%
  2. Ты теперь житель нижнекамска65%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 514,362 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Konfi” (@konfikonfi), 10,317 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konfikonfi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.