Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Klartext-im-O-Ton 🎤

@klartextimotn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,747subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001427596020
TypeChannel
Username@klartextimotn
Created1 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/klartextimotn

Growth

1,7471,7511,7496 August 2026 — 1,751 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,751 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,748 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,747 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,746–1,752 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:571,747-1
10 Aug 2026, 04:471,748-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:331,751no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:511,751first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 07s
Average length
2m 42s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎1832.7%
1527.3%
😢1120.0%
👍712.7%
😁35.45%
🤯11.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC234 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @derprophetischeblick

Hat die EU jetzt die Massenüberwachung beschlossen? 🤔 Im Netz ist von "Stasi 2.0" und einer umfassenden Chatkontrolle die Rede. Doch was wurde tatsächlich beschlossen – und was nicht? Dieser Artikel ordnet die Fakten verständlich ein und zeigt, warum Wachsamkeit trotzdem wichtig bleibt. https://derprophetischeblick.substack.com/p/hat-die-eu-jetzt-die-chatkontrolle .

👎1🤯1

13 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC275 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💥Der Zebra-Typ von Erfurt war bei der AfD. Dort ist er rausgeflogen, weil er zu radikal war. Jetzt lebt er seinen Extremismus im politisch linken Lager aus. Kann man sich nicht ausdenken. https://youtu.be/nOVXeb-aOcA?si=6f9vR565-I11lpSq

😁32

7 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC≈1,300 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💥 Ursula von der Leyen könnte bald Ihre privaten Nachrichten mitlesen. Eine Abstimmung im Eilverfahren soll noch in dieser Woche stattfinden. Wir müssen sofort handeln! Die Europäische Kommission treibt einen Plan namens "Chatkontrolle" voran. Dieser gefährliche Vorschlag sieht vor, dass Unternehmen alle unsere privaten Nachrichten im Internet mit einem Computerprogramm durchsuchen. Dazu gehören E-Mails, WhatsApp, T

👎2

20 May 2026, 08:59 UTC594 viewsread 7 August 2026

30. April 2026 https://youtube.com/shorts/61qqmioCdAo?is=v_ko1WtuV5KplyEG

15 May 2026, 08:21 UTC654 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

frühzeitig abstellen! 🎭 Nancy Faeser zeigt ihr wahres Gesicht 👉 Findet irgendjemand, dass das hardcore-kommunistischte ist, was sie jemals gesagt hat? 👉 Ihr sollt eure Kinder nicht erziehen, das machen die Onkels, die Nancy schickt - keine Sorge Quelle: Netzfund Teile diesen Beitrag – mehr Menschen sollten das sehen 🐇 Folgen: Das Weiße Kaninchen 🤩

17 Apr 2026, 12:47 UTC698 viewsread 7 August 2026

"Der ehemalige Bundesliga-Profi Roger Prinzen ist im Alter von 57 Jahren verstorben. Der deutsche Ex-Kicker von Austria und FC Lustenau verstarb am Montagabend im Alter von nur 57 Jahren „plötzlich und unerwartet“, wie der deutsche Bundesligist 1. FC Heidenheim am Dienstag mitteilte." https://www.msn.com/de-at/nachrichten/other/fr%C3%BCherer-bundesliga-profi-mit-57-jahren-gestorben/ar-AA20Ty9l .

15 Apr 2026, 17:11 UTC578 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @derprophetischeblick

- - - EILMELDEUNG - - - 💥 Altersverifikations-App ist fertig. Jeder, der zukünftig Social Media nutzen möchte, muss sein Alter nachweisen. ⚠️ Von der Leyen zieht den Vergleich zur App mit den Impf-Zertifikaten während der Corona-Zeit und will den "großen Erfolg dieser App auf die Altersverifikations-App übertragen". https://youtu.be/bSjbcRbnR5k?si=IkPi2fE2xYPhIQjy .

👎82

8 Apr 2026, 13:54 UTC611 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

❓Hausärzte müssen Impfquoten erfüllen❓ Wenn du bei allem was auf der Welt passiert, ob politisch oder menschlich, nicht an Zufälle glaubst, bist du bei uns genau richtig. — Oliver Schmitt Abonniere jetzt — es erwartet dich viele wichtige Informationen: @Verbotene_Wahrheit

👎6

27 Mar 2026, 16:15 UTC655 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @auf1tvVideo

🕵🏻‍♂️ Wegen Fernandes-Affäre: Merz will Ihre IP-Adressen! Unter dem Deckmantel des Schutzes von Frauen vor „digitaler Gewalt" treibt Kanzler Friedrich Merz ein altes Projekt voran: die Vorratsdatenspeicherung. Doch das soll erst der Anfang sein. Im Bundestag zeigte der CDU-Politiker sich erschreckend ehrlich. Der Beitrag erschien in den „Nachrichten AUF1“ vom 26.03.2026. Mit den täglichen „Nachrichten AUF1“ um 18 U

1👎1

24 Mar 2026, 22:14 UTC723 viewsread 7 August 2026

"Der Mensch wurde genetisch verändert!" - Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi https://youtube.com/watch?v=kjtAc8c9bRU&is=uOAM15tS2zxzlPS1

18 Mar 2026, 09:54 UTCviews —

Klartext-im-O-Ton 🎤 pinned «💥 Biontech-Gründer schmeißen hin! Bhakdi fordert Annullierung aller Impfverträge Die Biontech-Gründer treten genau jetzt ab – während neue Beweise zeigen, dass mRNA-Impfstoffe Krebs auslösen und sich sogar über die Plazenta auf Babys übertragen. Prof. Sucharit…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @klartextimotn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,080,063 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Klartext-im-O-Ton 🎤” (@klartextimotn), 1,747 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klartextimotn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.