Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

kumabora.exe

@kkumabora

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,534subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002444485588
TypeChannel
Username@kkumabora
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kkumabora

Growth

1,5321,5361,5347 August 2026 — 1,536 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,536 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,535 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,532 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,534 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,531–1,537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:071,534+2
10 Aug 2026, 21:341,532-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:131,535-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:331,536no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:151,536first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
136.2%
avg views ÷ 1,534 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,090
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held7 (11 July 202624 July 2026)
Views total4,180
Reactions total580
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,627 reactions across 7 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
75346.3%
😢1489.10%
💯1227.50%
🎉1217.44%
👏1056.45%
🤬593.63%
🔥583.56%
🤮543.32%
❤‍🔥513.13%
🤯422.58%
🥰261.60%
🤡171.04%
😁160.983%
🤝160.983%
👍100.615%
👀50.307%
🏆40.246%
😨40.246%
😱40.246%
💔30.184%
6 further kinds90.553%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,627reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 7 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kkumabora. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,400 views221 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @anna_levchenkoPhoto

Знаете, вся эта история с Гусиной Империей и их пернатыми педофилами меня уже конкретно достала. Третья неделя заканчивается и всё еще никаких хороших новостей. Вот мне тут многие в комментах периодически пишут, что этих Гусей кто-то покрывает. Не знаю, есть ли у них какие-то влиятельные покровители, но хочу обратиться ко всем тем, кто покрывает или укрывает у себя тех из них, кто в розыске. В частности например Кузь

😢14743🤯17🤬4🤮4😨4🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC≈2,780 views359 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vshr3kPhoto

Просто к сведению: теперь и музыка гусей вся удалена. пала империя

240🔥50❤‍🔥29🎉15👍6👏6😁6💔3

14 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC≈2,740 views407 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vshr3kPhoto

Канала на YT "Empire of Geese" больше не существует, удалили.

239🎉106🥰26😁10👏7🤯7❤‍🔥4🏆3

13 Jul 2026, 01:27 UTC≈3,060 views181 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Удаленная страница это Виктор, virt queen -Аида, Hammer - Виктор. По легенде Ирка работает менеджером этого софта , они даже не стыдились об этом заливать в те годы, совсем бессмертными себя чувствуют, и все это из переписки с 13летним на то время мальчиком

👏92🤬53🤡178👀5🤯3🗿2👾1

13 Jul 2026, 01:11 UTC≈2,330 views157 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как будто мы плавно забыли о еще одной женщине в этом деле Аиде Хамасуридзе или Алене Виноградовой (настоящее имя не известно , предположительно сестра Татьяны Сударкиной (мамы-утки)) . Она даже засветилась в шоу Мэддисона ДНИЩЕ он делал на нее обзор. Сам Виктор представлял ее как Ирку и говорил что она его сестра Активные годы деятельности 2015-2018. с 2015 ВК VIRT QUEEN с 2017 Аллея Мрака Так же занималась вирто

79🤮50🤯15👍4😱4🤬2👾1🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 22:06 UTC≈2,460 views147 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А КАК ЖЕ ТАК ВЫ ГОВОРИТЕ ГОСПОДА ПОЛИГРАФОЛОГИ "НУ ОН ЖЕ ПРОСТО ПОДРОЧИЛ" ЕСЛИ ВАША ЦИТАТА мастурбация - это неправильно и не по христиански

💯12214❤‍🔥10🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 21:54 UTC≈2,650 views155 reactionsread 7 August 2026

КАКОЙ СЮР, Я ПРОСТО НЕ ВЕРЮ В ТО ЧТО ЧИТАЮ... ПОСАДИТЕ УЖЕ НАС С АННОЙ ЛЕВЧЕНКО ЧЕ УЖ МЕЛОЧИТЬСЯ ...

130🤝16❤‍🔥8🔥1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @kkumabora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kumabora.exe” (@kkumabora), 1,534 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkumabora.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.