Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ㅤкризализм‍‍ ‍‍ ‍‍౿౿

Channel

ㅤкризализм‍‍ ‍‍ ‍‍౿౿

@kkrisalism

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,547subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002459767607
TypeChannel
Username@kkrisalism
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kkrisalism

Growth

1,5471,5841,565.57 August 2026 — 1,583 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,583 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,584 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,582 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,576 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,577 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,562 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,552 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,547 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,541–1,590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 02:471,547-5
27 Aug 2026, 10:241,552-10
24 Aug 2026, 16:551,562-5
20 Aug 2026, 20:241,567-10
17 Aug 2026, 11:581,577+1
13 Aug 2026, 18:071,576-6
11 Aug 2026, 03:441,582-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:011,584+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:181,583no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:061,583first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 16 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

782 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54631081890189411548611.0%
custom 53908521159523338108110.4%
custom 53301122503656287817910.1%
custom 5422474285115540752789.97%
custom 5337189274137688369759.59%
custom 5201689184867214290749.46%
custom 5431792538786758007678.57%
custom 5222440912063335673607.67%
custom 5390998015991383517344.35%
custom 5328162382457884127334.22%
custom 5391074633912975785334.22%
custom 5332549747385330109283.58%
custom 5327831850364722224273.45%
🍌273.45%

Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 9 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kkrisalism. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 February 2026 to 12 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jun 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,350 views66 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Poll

🤩🤩

  1. 🤩 учше буду голым (-ой) ходить, чем в этом 🤩21%
  2. 🤩 мне 🤩 понравилось . .85%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 546310818901894115437custom 522244091206333567329

12 Jun 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,420 views80 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ׄ︶ 🤩 ྀི 𝑜ткройте одно из пяти фото,⬜ㅤֵ 🎀 то, что в𝒶м ︵᷼⌒ ♡ ִ 🤩 ׄвыпало — ваш 🤩 гардер𝑜б до конца жизни🌟𝔔 ㅤ݃

custom 546310818901894115449custom 522244091206333567331

2 Jun 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,850 views129 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⬜ ︵⏜ ☀️🌟︵⏜︵ㅤ 𝒩e te sou𝒸ie pas 𝒶ujourd’hui de ce q𝓊i n’aura plus d’importance 𝒹ans un mois ᅠ ᛝᩧ ྀ ⠀ֵ 🤩ℰ напрягайся из-з𝒶 того, что чℯрез меcяц 𝗒͜же не будет 𝓊меть значения ૮₍ ´ ᩙ ˋू ₎ა ⚞ ⏝⏝ 🌸🤩 ⇢

custom 520168918486721429074custom 533254974738533010928🍌27

25 Feb 2026, 05:35 UTC≈3,520 views134 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

ℳ.𝓐. Врубель (1856–1910) – 🔣художник, автор работ с «кристаллической» манерой ℰ𓈒 письма. в 1902 году его поместили в психиатрическую клинику👁 у него был ‹ прогрессивный паралич › ㅤ ⃝⃝ ִ в 1903 году ׄ ему❀ диагностировали биполярное расстройство. в последние годы он страдал от тяжелых проблем с психикой. психические заболевания повлияли на его картины 🔣

custom 539085211595233381067custom 539099801599138351734custom 539107463391297578533

21 Feb 2026, 23:24 UTC≈2,990 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 533011225036562878120custom 53908521159523338104

18 Feb 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,890 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ׄ ୨ пойдем рисовать тату хной?

custom 539085211595233381010

18 Feb 2026, 16:57 UTC≈3,000 views119 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍷апоминание: ❀ когда мы уже с тобой ♡゙ нарисуем друг другу )៸ т𝒂тушки хной?? 핌 ݂ 🤩 ㅤ✧ׅ͡ ㅤидеи для татушек 🤩🤩 ៸࣪៸ ִ꒱

custom 533011225036562878159custom 532816238245788412733custom 532783185036472222427

16 Feb 2026, 19:42 UTC≈2,870 views121 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⠀⏖⠀ ⠀ ׁ ⠀⠀Il n’y 𝒶 pas demauvaise fin ; si elle est mauvaise, ce n’estp𝒶s encore l𝒶 fin ⠀⠀੭̲ не бывает плохого конца, если он плохой – это еще не конец タ 🤩

custom 542247428511554075249custom 543179253878675800740custom 533718927413768836932

16 Feb 2026, 19:42 UTC≈2,590 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀 Il y 𝒂 encore des gens dans lemonde que tu dℴis rencℴntrer —⠀⠀𝟦𝟦𝟦 🌟🌟 ♡︎ິ🤍 ⎯𐙚 🍷 мире еще ес𝓶ь люди, которых ты дℴлжен встретить

custom 533718927413768836943custom 542247428511554075229custom 543179253878675800727

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kkrisalism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jun 2026, 07:30 UTCAnonymous Poll297 voters

🤩🤩

  1. 🤩 учше буду голым (-ой) ходить, чем в этом 🤩21%
  2. 🤩 мне 🤩 понравилось . .85%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 12 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤкризализм‍‍ ‍‍ ‍‍౿౿” (@kkrisalism), 1,547 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkrisalism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.