Channel
@kirrrkun
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,527subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002011034489 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kirrrkun |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kirrrkun |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 1,527 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 1,525 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 1,525 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (23 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,005 |
| Reactions total | 505 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
505 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5465156991498346038 | 222 | 44.0% | |
| custom 5474325239141794876 | 163 | 32.3% | |
| custom 5287278279529626318 | 80 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5260321230828892393 | 40 | 7.92% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 505reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
чел пишет мне под постом «генсуха», норм вообще нет? еще из интересного, я инстрина и юичка 🍺 а я может хочу ваней золо быть ало..
custom 547432523914179487610custom 54651569914983460384custom 52872782795296263181
минут 10 и запущу 🌟
custom 526032123082889239328custom 52872782795296263188custom 54651569914983460388custom 54743252391417948762
сегодня вечером стрим жб 🤩 https://www.twitch.tv/kirrrkun
custom 52603212308288923938custom 52872782795296263183custom 54651569914983460381
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ стикеры вам новые добавлю ⭐️https://t.me/boost/kirrrkun ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
custom 547432523914179487611custom 52872782795296263183custom 54651569914983460382
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️💤💤
custom 546515699149834603842custom 547432523914179487618custom 528727827952962631812custom 52603212308288923932
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 54743252391417948769custom 54651569914983460383custom 52603212308288923931
мужчина который умеет готовить это сексуально нах
custom 546515699149834603833custom 52872782795296263188custom 54743252391417948764
🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝
custom 546515699149834603858custom 528727827952962631813custom 547432523914179487613
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 546515699149834603833custom 547432523914179487613custom 528727827952962631811
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 547432523914179487625custom 546515699149834603811custom 52872782795296263184custom 52603212308288923931
клянусь если бы айфон 6s не лагал, я пользовалась бы только им он идеален new tatt: @Kriks_tattoo 🫶
custom 547432523914179487656custom 528727827952962631812custom 546515699149834603810
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 546515699149834603817custom 52872782795296263185custom 54743252391417948762
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kirrrkun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 620,355 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘬𝘪𝘳𝘳𝘬𝘶𝘯” (@kirrrkun), 1,527 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kirrrkun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.