开通ChaGPT Plus/Pro以后自行去下方机器人 ChatGPT自助机器人 支持机器人克隆 👌联系 @liyunlong
❤2

Channel
@kingsangkinghts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,530subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001933886614 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kingsangkinghts |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kingsangkinghts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 3,530 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 3,535 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 3,537 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 3,544 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 3,543 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 3,549 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 3,551 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 3,550 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:10 | 3,542 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 3,542 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
147 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 66 | 44.9% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 25.2% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 9.52% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 6.80% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 2.04% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 2.04% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.68% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2025 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
开通ChaGPT Plus/Pro以后自行去下方机器人 ChatGPT自助机器人 支持机器人克隆 👌联系 @liyunlong
❤2
大量出售JAGO账户 可用于支付Telegram单月/Telegram单周 对于其他业务价格自测 创建虚拟卡费用为每张2.4usdt不到 最高可创46张卡片 jago官网 👌联系 @liyunlong
❤8
试问是怎么做到的一言难尽的市场....... 👌联系: @liyunlong
❤5🥴1
出南方协议脚本..........
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7👍3
单月市场最近的紊乱以及些许客户反馈综合考虑即刻起 机器人中订单后期不会再出售账号中的助力来填补利润,原因不做一 一解释了 因此不再接受低价单月订单 单个价格依然保持3.5不会做出更改
❤14💩7👍6🤡3🤣2🤮2👎1👏1
一生都不会再碰乌克兰的银行账户 令人心寒 😁联系:@liyunlong
❤8👏3💊3
出一些尼日利亚gomoney L3账户已开两张卡 提供邮箱来换绑 😁联系:@liyunlong
👍3❤2🥰1
Posted without readable text
TG开通单月以后自行去下方机器人 tg单月自助开通机器人 👌联系 @liyunlong
👍9👏4😱2❤1😨1
开了1412个单月 让打钱就跑路 注意这只跑路狗 到处骗 @yutongTg 受害者 😁联系 @liyunlong
❤5
挨电了….
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kingsangkinghts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“King!” (@kingsangkinghts), 3,530 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kingsangkinghts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.