Channel
@kekeneng888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004291877441 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kekeneng888 |
| Created | 11 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kekeneng888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 37 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 31 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,085 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
出击人员:9527 所在城市：大亚湾 老师名称：可心 妹子年龄：21 妹子容貌：7分，照片p过 妹子身材：166cm C胸 105斤 服务态度：刚下海，聊得来很nice，配合好。 环境设备：公寓环境，干净卫生。 自由评论：再次探雷，比较晚一直再等出击。看到群里照片不假思索立刻拿下。见面可可与照片7-8分像，真人会丰满一点。可心比较爱笑，温声细语知性，聊天得知她原先在福建做92，刚下海，人很nice，聊了会天，情绪价值拉满。脱衣身体上围丰满，C胸软软的，能满足大部分兄弟的要求。脱衣洗澡，主动来个水中萧。上床问喜欢什么衣服丝袜，性感氛围拉满。趴下享受胸推轻吻全身，会所该有的都有。一波福利后，上套干活。可心三点粉嫩，接近一线天。可可接受69，奈何本人也不爱口就没有69了。可心身体比较敏感，下面太紧，弟弟一直被夹，可可喘息声比较自然好听，不久就上半身就一片潮红。手漂亮，抓床单很稳，能女上。屁股有肉，后入舒服。由于我太累，最后就没有出，…
所在城市：大亚湾 出击者名：班 老师名称：可可 上课价格：6张 妹子年龄：20 妹子容貌：人照7分，鹅蛋脸，大眼睛，说话很甜 妹子身材：身高1.66，体重105，胸比较大，喜欢微微胖的可以冲 服务态度：态度我给10分吧，直接给我上了一整套，都超时了都，还不让我走 环境设备：10分，某大 自由评论：妹子各方面都挺不错，最主要服务态度好，刚下水的，一插进去她都要高潮一样的，一个劲哼哼唧唧，说一年多没有做了，直接按东莞的标准给我来了一整套，我都趴累了 综合评估：刚下水，微胖服务员嫩妹，可以冲 联系方式： 手动报告模版
❤3
刚到惠阳 ，希望惠阳哥哥们喜欢 @Mmmg520
❤1
可可嫩妹刚下海05年个人服务 新人刚下海，身高166 体重53公斤 胸围36c丰满，皮肤白嫩，水多，三点粉嫩 希望哥哥们温柔点，刚下海暂时接受不了毒龙，过段时间会慢慢接受，以及更新好的服务 A套餐p600💰（35分钟）洗 吹 做 B套餐p700💰（45分钟）菀试服务 C套餐pp1300💰（90分钟）菀试服务 D套餐1600💰（2小时无限火力套）菀试服务 情趣道具随便玩 菀试服务如下： 陪浴鸳鸯戏水 水中萧 指滑 🐍吻 （需刷牙无异味） 69 吹箫调情 漫游 胸推 臀推 情趣丝袜 都有各种姿势配合 ⚠️為了安全出擊💋💋請大家現金交易 🌹 夜课：3000凌晨12点到8点赠送菀试服务 特价夜 2000凌晨3点到8点莞试服务 提前預定需定金100.外出2課起➕路費1張訂金2張出門 🈲️：吃药 喝酒 🈚️套 素质差，🈶口臭 变态 jj太大到现场会被退，超过20分钟用手打 发现拔套直接走人，水费不退，桩机别来，撞伤或休…
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @kekeneng888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 685,521 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“惠阳 ❤️🉑心 ❤️05年嫩妹个人空间” (@kekeneng888), 37 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kekeneng888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.