記得等三根retest
👍100❤16🔥5
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null

Channel
@kblablablahere
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,529subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001691865135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kblablablahere |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 July 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kblablablahere |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 3,529 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 3,536 | -15 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:39 | 3,551 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 3,558 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 3,568 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 3,571 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,049 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,070 | 52.2% | |
| ❤ | 851 | 41.5% | |
| 🥰 | 92 | 4.49% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 1.17% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 0.537% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.049% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,049reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2022 to 13 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
記得等三根retest
👍100❤16🔥5
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
短期注意這兩個點,大跌破則是反轉信號,要回去看大區間了
❤77👏2
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
記得上一下套保
👍67❤8
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
短期我關注的是這個區間,再更下面也可以標一個更大的
🥰78
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
哈囉大家好,最近這一週一直在給大家看我們的量化,有很多人詢問,其中也包括對於量化的誤解,我打算用這篇文為各位做個程式交易的初步介紹 當我們在做主觀交易的時候,會參考非常多的點,像是趨勢線突破回踩、壓力支撐區間的突破或是回踩,許許多多技術指標的背離或是零軸上下穿,這都是我們做主觀交易時會參考的要件,這也就是大多數人的交易方式 而程式交易則是抓住這些要點,用這些主觀交易的想法使用程式去還原出來,並且交由電腦去執行 那麼大家肯定會有疑問了,既然程式交易是出發自主觀交易,那程式交易又有哪裡好呢?首先,我們模擬一個情境,想像1204那天的插針下跌,有多少人主觀地去追空,在底部主觀的接多,又有多少人愣在原地不知所措,而錯失了真正的大行情,所以我想說的第一個點是,程式交易讓你不用考驗自己的「人性」,而這也是真正頂級的Trader該做的,看到什麼就做什麼。 再來,一個交易者是會累的,每個人一天就是醒著18個小時,在這有限的時間之內,你要…
❤165👍15
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
💬b12ny的生活碎碎念 - 選擇 大家常說 小朋友才做選擇 大人全都要 其實仔細想想 都是自己安慰自己 小朋友可以選擇不要做 但你全部沒得選都得做 再仔細想想 這樣也沒什麼不好 做越多事情 經歷過越多 你的能力與閱歷就會越多 能力比較好 你會相對有效率 閱歷比較多 有更多資訊可以對比 這些可以幫助你 克服生活中的困難 做出比別人更準確的判斷 找到更適合自己的選擇 畢竟無法克服這些困難的話 就會開始產生很多痛苦 避免痛苦是人生幸福的要素 辛苦跟痛苦 怎麼也是得選辛苦 為什麼只有兩個選項 因為有的時候就是 沒得選 你唯一可以做的就是 選擇要犧牲掉哪些東西 當你必須犧牲掉一些東西 你就會有所警惕 去珍惜去保護你所僅有的 這會給你一個動力去充實自己 多數無法抉擇的人 就會持續原地踏步 時…
👍141❤13
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
行即知 知即行 大家可以思考看看,在做單的時候,你最先湧起來的感覺是什麼,看到這張圖表,你第一步是想做多還是做空? 大家心裡或許會有不同的答案,可能是做多,可能是做空,這就是所謂的行,而事後的感覺,可能是賺錢,可能是賠錢,這就是他帶給你事後的感覺 你的歷史經驗告訴你在這個時候做多是正確的,在這個時候做空是錯誤的,而對應帶給你的感覺就是這些行為留下的感知 所以當你對賠錢感到厭惡時,最好的動作就是以新的行去改造替換你的知,讓你能夠賺錢 以行去改變你的知是讓你擺脫同樣的感覺唯一的方法 講的有點深奧了,希望各位可以深刻審慎所謂的知與行,前提是你有良好的行為準則能讓你成功的導向你想要的行與知
👍161❤30🔥4
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
最後我想跟各位聊一下關於內卷問題 其實幣圈就是這樣,大家在做的事情無非都是經營群組、報單、分析行情這類型的事情,使用的方式也多半大同小異,PA、TA、數據流 而我講一句坦白且不中聽的,多半都是了無新意且無聊的 在這樣的情況下,大家又是根據什麼來選擇要follow誰呢? 看看Youtube給我們的例子,YouTube上充斥著形形色色的YouTuber,在我們這個時代,真的很難去說一個影片的題材從來都沒有人拍過 然而,儘管題材是相同的,不同的YouTuber拍出來的影片對於群眾的吸引力就是不同,大家追尋的是個人魅力,是你的核心價值 同樣的東西放到當今的幣圈,其實也是相同的道理,每個人都在做相同的事情,大家追求的是個人特質與核心價值,首先要成為的是讓人喜歡的人 我明白,其實幣圈進來的人都是想賺錢,在金錢的影響之下,這個圈子會更加的勾心鬥角、猜忌懷疑、相互設計,拿我的例子來講,這對我而言是始料未及、偏離初心,令我萬分難受 …
👍247❤32🥰9🔥6👏4
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
最近思考了很多,突然意識到從11月到現在,自己已經從一個默默無聞的交易者,變成了有2000多個人觀看的小小KOL,這要感謝各位的支持,一直以來多謝各位的照顧了 說自己是KOL其實不太好,因為回想起創辦這個無論是頻道還是粉專的目的一直都是為了比較雙向的交流,讓我能認識更多厲害的人大家一起交易,希望各位之後能夠更像是把我當作朋友,大家互相尊重、有品質的交流,把我當作一個人,而不是一個報單機器來對話 這幾天儘管我還沒進軍營,我依舊選擇把群組的對話關掉,一部分是因為我開始感覺到自己的發言開始要承擔起一些責任,一部分也是我認為目前群組內的訊息有點過於雜亂,莫名其妙地開始出現了很多詐騙,或是宣傳的訊息,這兩個方面都令我開始感到有社會上的壓力,所以我決定要為這個群組制定一些小小的發言規則,來維護我心目中理想的社群該有的樣子 1、在群組內盡量不要出現問明牌的行為,與其問說「SOL可以多嗎?」,希望各位可以把問題替換成「SOL短線上出現了X…
❤286👍26👏5🥰5
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
這幾天跟狗哥還有數據大師三個人聚一聚,談論了有趣的事情,剛好最近遇上文章難產,且上一篇剛好講到左右側,所以我拿出來讓各位思考一下 關於左側和右側其實我後來經過討論之後又分出了兩個面向,分別是順勢還有逆勢,那這樣的話想法就是二平方個 順勢跟逆勢的意思是說在自己定義的交易級別內是不是順著趨勢的方向去交易,左側跟右側則是有沒有明確的反轉才去交易 各位不妨思考一下自己所做的交易究竟是處在四個象限中的哪一個,思考一下這四個象限的優缺點,以及這四個象限該如何去做風險管理,我想會對各位交易的心法上有一定的幫助
👍140❤9🔥2😢1
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
Photo, posted without a caption
❤98🔥7👍6
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader | Null
打個小工,負責幫他們報一些教學單,把關一下丟單的品質,之後會看到我在這邊報單 https://instagram.com/stories/traderk1101/2892884942589970499?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
❤83👍8
Signed Trader K | Apex Trader
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kblablablahere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto_K的碎碎念(轉移到dc)” (@kblablablahere), 3,529 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kblablablahere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.