Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фэшн с человеческим лицом

Channel

Фэшн с человеческим лицом

@kate_about_style

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,097subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001554427306
TypeChannel
Username@kate_about_style
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kate_about_style

Growth

1,0971,0981,097.57 August 2026 — 1,097 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,097 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,098 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,097 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,097–1,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:431,097-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:131,098+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:331,097no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:271,097first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 7 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

140 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5539.3%
🔥4129.3%
❤‍🔥1812.9%
💯96.43%
😍53.57%
👌21.43%
🗿21.43%
🙏21.43%
custom 541149758565752440310.714%
10.714%
💋10.714%
🤔10.714%
🤬10.714%
🥰10.714%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2025 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 9 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kate_about_style. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 September 2025 to 15 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jun 2026, 05:25 UTC246 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Кстати, наш Юрий Колокольников смотрится даже лучше, чем Генри Кавилл.

🔥91💯1

14 Jun 2026, 14:54 UTC255 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

На днях изучала по работе мужскую ассортиментную матрицу 12Storeez. Ходила по магазину и думала, что все модно, но не очень продаваемо. Smart casual мало, почти все ооочень расслабленный casual для тех, кто ходит каждый день в условной пижаме. А таких клиентов не так много. Да и с тяжёлой фактурой как будто бы явный перебор. А вечером того же дня смотрю новый фильм Гая Ричи и все мужские луки как на подбор из катал

6💯4🔥2

12 Jun 2026, 10:23 UTC273 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, кто из частных клиентов хотел поработать со мной по вопросам имиджа/стиля, в эти выходные действуют специальные (очень приятные😍) условия. В каком формате можем сотрудничать: 📍консультация 📍вопрос/ответ 📍долгосрочная работа 📍имидж бук По всем вопросам пишите @katialavita Всем красивых и эстетичных выходных❤️

5❤‍🔥4🔥3💋1

8 Mar 2026, 10:55 UTC530 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Отличное интервью с Екатериной Алехиной. Заголовок не самый праздничный, но сама статья отличная, очень рекомендую. Всех девушек и женщин поздравляю и пусть у всех все будет хорошо💐.

6❤‍🔥2👌1💯1🔥1custom 54114975856575244031

28 Feb 2026, 07:47 UTC660 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Закончила большой проект, который вела с апреля 2025 года. Было много достижений за этот период, которые забрала в свою копилку. А к опыту управления розничным бизнесом в сфере fashion теперь добавилась и ювелирная сфера с миллиардными оборотами, запуск новых проектов, ребрендинг, ecom продажи, новые системы мотивации для персонала и много чего еще. Уже начала смотреть новые предложения, дальше точно будет интерес

🔥158💯1🥰1

6 Nov 2025, 21:05 UTC≈25,300 views22 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

С большим удовольствием послушала (пока только половину, оно длинное) интервью Николая Картозии. Сразу вспомнила и свои годы учебы на журфаке МГУ с 1998 по 2004, и работу на НТВ на первом курсе, и Парфенова, и Пивоварова, и Лошака, и Борю Корчевникова. И как поступила с первого раза на бюджет тоже. И то, как я спустя 8 месяцев работы ушла с НТВ, потому что поняла - это не мое вообще. Журфак я честно закончила, отуч

8❤‍🔥5🔥3🗿2🙏2🤔1🤬1

14 Sept 2025, 08:21 UTC≈1,200 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

На Cosmoscow было много стендов коммерческих брендов, которые пытались с разной степенью успешности интегрировать себя в искусство. Спойлер: по большей частью не получилось. На эту же тему там же была лекция «Мода+искусство», куда я забежала, чтобы понять алгоритм, как выстроить более менее успешную коллаборацию между чистым, как правило абсолютно нефункциональным творчеством (художник), и коммерческой частью (брен

6💯1🔥1

13 Sept 2025, 13:19 UTC914 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Осталась в полнейшем восторге от Cosmoscow’25. Не поленилась даже встать рано утром, чтобы успеть приехать с 10 до 12, когда не так много людей. Что понравилось: 📍Все ОЧЕНЬ эстетично: и основная выставка на 1 этаже, и пространство на 2 этаже, и фуд-корт, и shop зона. Ходила по Тимирязев центру 3 часа и еле заставила себя оттуда уехать. 📍Много разных коллабораций коммерческих брендов, интересно было посмотреть, что

11🔥7😍3❤‍🔥2💯1

7 Sept 2025, 15:48 UTC782 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если вы еще не были на выставке «Les Fauves Russes» в музее русского импрессионизма, то очень рекомендую. Сочетания цветов прекрасны. Испанка Матисса и корова Шагала - тоже. Петр Кончаловский и Кристиан Корнелиус Крон - великолепны. Но мои фавориты - детские слюнявчики с цитатами Михаила Ларионова, которые просто созданы друг для друга. Не забудьте зайти на 3 этаж в импровизированную мастерскую Матисса. Правда, там

❤‍🔥54😍21👌1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kate_about_style. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фэшн с человеческим лицом” (@kate_about_style), 1,097 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kate_about_style.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.