Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الاستاذ كرار العامري

Channel

الاستاذ كرار العامري

@kararha_99

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,639subscribers

+530 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002927140857
TypeChannel
Username@kararha_99
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kararha_99

Growth

6,1096,6496,37919 August 2026 — 6,109 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,124 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,117 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,431 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,649 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,639 subscribers6,63919 August 20263 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 15 days, net +530. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,028–6,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 10:036,639-10
31 Aug 2026, 07:356,649+218
27 Aug 2026, 23:026,431+314
24 Aug 2026, 21:056,117-7
20 Aug 2026, 21:136,124+15
19 Aug 2026, 21:456,109first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.0%
avg views ÷ 6,639 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total30,502
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC762 viewsread 19 August 2026

🤍تبليغ حبايب🤍 يوم الجمعة امتحان تراكمي بـ 8️⃣محاضرات يعني من بداية الفصل الثاني لحد محاضرة 8️⃣

19 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 19 August 2026
Photo

الفصل الثاني محاضرة 8️⃣ https://youtu.be/BcHmfsJkco0?si=1yuKfKCqCV_gfbRP

18 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 19 August 2026
Photo

التسجيل مستمر الي حباب يبدي من الفصل الثاني اليوم جانت أول محاضرة بالفصل الثاني الالكترونيه للكروبات الجديدة للاستفسار والتسجيل @kararhaedr99

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kararha_99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الاستاذ كرار العامري” (@kararha_99), 6,639 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kararha_99.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.