特斯拉确认正自研 AI 地图,将随 FSD v15 逐步推送 在最新的特斯拉财报电话会议上,特斯拉副总裁阿肖克 · 埃卢斯瓦米(Ashok Elluswamy)宣布,特斯拉正在自研一套基于 AI 的地图导航系统。 这套全新地图方案将随 FSD v15 上线,融合车队采集数据、个性化路线规划,同时支持 FSD 语音控制。 特斯拉目前的导航是第三方地图内容搭配自研软件。此前“偏好路线”功能上线时就有报道说明:谷歌通过 API 提供底图瓦片、街道数据、卫星影像、兴趣点以及路况信息;特斯拉自己开发导航应用、计算路线,因此可以把超充站点、用户偏好纳入路线决策。 财报会上,一位股东提问,提到 FSD 在限速识别、泊车、路线选择上存在问题。埃卢斯瓦米对此表示认同:“你说得完全没错,我们本就不该依赖外部厂商的地图。” 他随后确认,特斯拉正在自研这套 AI 地图,用来解决当下 FSD 暴露的一系列问题,包括限速识别、泊车以及路线规划。 …

Channel
北北工作室|Telegram 服务导航
@kanhaoma
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
26,018subscribers
-23,146 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001105975453 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @kanhaoma @yeskh |
| Description | 北北官方业务导航|服务入口・使用教程・最新通知 TRX 能量|TG会员・星币|eSIM|账号服务|实用工具 认准本频道,所有业务入口以频道公布为准 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 94 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kanhaoma |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:27 | 26,018 | no change |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:55 | 26,018 | -2,307 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 28,325 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 28,327 | -31 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 28,358 | -40 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 28,398 | -66 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:20 | 28,464 | no change |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:35 | 28,464 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:48 | 28,468 | no change |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 28,468 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 28,469 | no change |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:36 | 28,469 | +3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:38 | 28,466 | no change |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 28,466 | -284 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:35 | 28,750 | no change |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 28,750 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:51 | 28,756 | no change |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 28,756 | -1,080 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:26 | 29,836 | -1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:08 | 29,837 | first reading |
Engagement
136 posts held, back to 14 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 140 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.237%
- avg views ÷ 26,018 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 61.6
- 124 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.392%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 124
- of 136 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 124 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 136 (14 February 2026 – 25 October 2026) |
| Views total | 7,634 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 09:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 179
- Videos
- 28
- Links
- 87
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 10m 09s
- Average length
- 47s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
41 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 26.8% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 12.2% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 9.76% | |
| 😘 | 4 | 9.76% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 136 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Instagram 推出 Apple TV 应用,带来 Reels 、长视频和直播等 这款应用似乎于 10 月 23 日上线。 Apple TV 专属的发布元数据显示,版本 66.0 的日期为当天;而 10 月 19 日存档的 App Store 页面仍显示该应用仅兼容 iPhone 和 iPad。 Instagram 于 2025 年 12 月首次在美国的 Amazon Fire TV 设备上测试电视应用,随后于 2026 年 2 月扩展至 Google TV,并于 6 月登陆三星智能电视。 🗒 标签: #Apple #Instagram 📢 频道: @GodlyNews1 🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
苹果首款折叠屏iPhone Duo出师不利:有人折不到20次就裂屏了 据Tom’s Guide、PhoneArena报道,iPhone Duo上市后,Reddit上陆续出现损坏照片:内屏沿中央铰链开裂,部分还伴随白色或绿色亮线。 一名澳大利亚用户表示,拿到iPhone Duo约6小时,展开不到20次,就在一次正常展开时听到断裂声,屏幕随即沿折痕裂开。用户称手机此前没有明显撞击。 这名用户最终在苹果零售店换到新机。但其他案例也接连出现:有人使用不到一天就发现裂纹,还有手机在初始设置尚未完成时就出现显示故障。 🗒 标签: #Apple #iPhone #折叠屏 📢 频道: @GodlyNews1 🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
Cursor现在可以控制您的电脑了 Cursor表示,Agent现在能驱动桌面应用(例如iOS模拟器)来测试自己写的功能。Computer Use功能让Agent可以在您计算机上的任何app中点击和输入,而不仅仅是浏览器。 当任务需要时,Cursor会自行使用它。您也可以通过 @Computer Use 来使用它。 via 匿名 🗒 标签: #Cursor 📢 频道: @GodlyNews1 🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
宾夕法尼亚州要求在 AI 生成的广告上标注说明 周四,宾夕法尼亚州州长签署了《人工智能欺骗性广告法》,使其正式生效,但法案存在不少“漏洞”。 该法要求对AI生成的广告进行披露。任何广告——无论是静态图片、视频、音频还是文字——只要“经过AI大幅修改或由AI生成”,就必须以与广告本身相同的形式附上标注。 这既适用于数十亿美元级公司的电视广告,也适用于餐馆宣传特价鸡翅时那些又丑又挤的传单。 不过,这项法律留下了不少漏洞。首先,什么才算“经过大幅修改”带有主观性。此外,法律豁免了“戏仿、讽刺、评论或批评”内容,以及任何“显然是虚构的”内容。但“显然是虚构的”究竟是什么意思,同样并不明确。 条文措辞还暗示,只有“以会令消费者对产品或服务产生错误认知的方式使用合成内容”的内容,才需要披露。这也留下了疑问:法律所说的“错误”如何界定,又由谁来作出判断。 🗒 标签: #人工智能欺骗性广告法 #AI 📢 频道: @GodlyNews…
Claude Code核心作者Thariq Shihipar离职 Thariq Shihipar正式从Anthropic离职,他是Claude Code团队的核心灵魂人物 他在X上正式发布了一封长文告别信:“在加入Claude Code 一年多,并亲眼见证它的规模扩展到远超我曾经的想象之后,我离开了 Anthropic。” 🗒 标签: #Anthropic #Claude 📢 频道: @GodlyNews1 🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
Xbox 首任COO上任仅几个月便离职 Xbox 首任首席运营官(COO)离职,而这一新职位设立至今才几个月。 据《The Verge》看到的一份 Xbox 内部备忘录,Helen Chiang将于今日离开微软。她在微软任职 21 年,曾担任《我的世界》负责人,并于今年 7 月获提拔,出任 Xbox COO,直接向CEO汇报。 Xbox CEO Asha Sharma在备忘录中表示,Chiang离职后,她目前负责的工作将暂时分由其他 Xbox 高管接手。Sharma还指出:“待相关计划敲定后,我们会进一步说明COO职位的安排。” 这听起来意味着,COO一职不会在设立仅几个月后就被撤销;但Chiang为何在任职如此短暂后离开,目前尚不清楚。 🗒 标签: #微软 #Xbox 📢 频道: @GodlyNews1 🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
OpenAI训练前沿 AI 模型时不再连接互联网 OpenAI 发现,即使没有网络连接,AI 智能体仍然可以相互通信。 OpenAI 在一篇最新的博文中表示,公司搭建了一个离线测试环境,让 AI 模型能够与经过索引和缓存的网页内容交互,“且不会对外部系统造成影响”。 为了实现这一目的,AI 智能体找到了通过处理器缓存进行通信的方法: 从缓存读取数据比从主存读取快,而这些智能体利用了这一时间差进行通信。 一个智能体通过将选定的数据从缓存中逐出,对信息进行编码;另一个则测量重新加载这些数据所需的时间,并利用读取速度快慢之间的差异还原消息。 智能体就信号的编码和解码方式达成协议后,便能交换这些模拟生成的机密,而无需修改共享文件或建立网络连接。 OpenAI 表示,已在监控系统中加入检查机制,以检测这类通信。在改进后的安全措施“足以证明扩大互联网访问权限是合理的”之前,公司还将继续在断网环境中训练其前沿 AI 模型。 Op…
报道称,Netflix 曾向微软开价 5 亿美元,试图获得 Xbox 游戏的改编授权 微软将报价提高了3亿,随后Netflix撤回了报价 据 《Puck》 在一篇探讨 Netflix 新领导层的报道中称,Xbox 首席执行官Asha Sharma及其团队要求 8 亿美元作为反报价,Netflix 随后撤回了报价。 本月,Xbox 成立了一个名为“XP”的部门,负责将其游戏改编成其他作品;目前,Xbox 已在与 Netflix 合作制作《暗黑破坏神》动画剧集。 🗒 标签: #Netflix #Xbox #XP #影视 #微软 📢 频道: @GodlyNews1 🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
Anthropic正在A/B测:5小时限额提升20%,周限额降低20%,仅影响部分Claude Max 用户 https://x.com/SemiAnalysis_/status/2113383965784502444 此前,第三方机构表示:Anthropic 订阅服务的性价比是 OpenAI 的 5 倍以上 🗒 标签: #OpenAI #Anthropic #Claude #ChatGPT 📢 频道: @GodlyNews1 🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
月之暗面发布Kimi K3.1Pro和K3.1ProHighspeed 月之暗面正式推出 Kimi K3.1 Pro,这是 K3.1 系列的第一个模型,也是我们迄今能力最强的 3 万亿级参数模型,支持 100 万上下文。Kimi K3.1 Pro 在代码、3D 创作、金融研究和其他长程 Agent 能力上的提升尤为显著。 同步推出高速版模型 Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed,同等智能,输出速度约 2~3 倍。 🗒 标签: #月之暗面 #Kimi 📢 频道: @GodlyNews1 🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
白宫公布第7批UAP (不明飞行物)记录 特朗普2026年2月指示全面解密美国UAP记录,白宫今天公布了第7批UAP记录,包含1950年代至2026年的多份未解案例报告。 特朗普政府于2026年5月8日正式推出UFO(不明飞行物)与UAP(不明异常现象)官方档案公开网站,由五角大楼负责管理,属于“总统UAP事件解密与报告系统”(PURSUE)的一部分。 网站主要收录美国军方、NASA、FBI、CIA等机构涉及不明飞行物的历史记录、调查报告、照片、视频及音频资料,部分内容此前属于机密文件。公众可以免费浏览、搜索和下载这些档案,了解美国政府对UAP现象的调查情况。不过,公开UFO档案并不代表美国政府已经证实外星生命的存在,其主要目的是提高相关信息的透明度。 via 匿名 🗒 标签: #UAP 📢 频道: @GodlyNews1 🤖 投稿: @GodlyNewsBot
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 136 posts we hold for @kanhaoma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@kanhaoma edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 October 2026
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@kanhaoma named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 October 2026 – 9 October 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“北北工作室|Telegram 服务导航” (@kanhaoma), 26,018 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kanhaoma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.