Channel
@juanortiznews
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
3,417subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003216322470 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @juanortiznews |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/juanortiznews |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
1.7 average views per post against 3,417 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.048%. Across the 1,036 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,165–9,998 subscribers, posting mainly in Spanish — the middle half sit between 6.67% and 21.9%, with a median of 12.2%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 20 of 20 published in the window (20 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 33 |
| Mature posts only | 0.055% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 3,417 measured 11 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:spa · 1,036 channels · p10 3.32% · p25 6.67% · p50 12.2% · p75 21.9% · p90 37.3% |
| Position in cohort | 0.097th percentile · 1/250 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.084% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Spanish · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 3,417 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 3,426 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 3,429 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:39 | 3,429 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 33 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🗳️📌 100 DÍAS DEL CASO ROCHA MOYA Se cumplen 100 días desde que Estados Unidos acusó a Rubén Rocha Moya y otros nueve funcionarios y exfuncionarios de Sinaloa. Los acusa de narcotráfico por presuntamente colaborar con el Cártel de Sinaloa. Según el Departamento de Justicia, protegían operaciones del cártel, filtraban información de seguridad y recibían sobornos. En el caso de Rocha, acusa que Los Chapitos ayudaron…
Photo, posted without a caption
🗳️📌 SHEINBAUM INCUMPLE PROMESA SOBRE FRACKING El 1 de marzo de 2024 prometió no permitir fractura hidráulica. Hasta quedó en el punto 87 de sus 100 compromisos de campaña. Ya como presidenta, el 6 de diciembre de 2024 repitió: “No va a haber fracking”. Ahora su gobierno realiza consultas técnicas para evaluar su uso en zonas del norte. México importa alrededor del 75% del gas que consume. Así que el dilema ener…
🗳️📌 Hoy, en eufemismos del bienestar, presentan: “Andy López Beltrán no hace campaña anticipada, solo usa sus zapatos para recorrer las calles”.
🗳️📌 SERGIO GUTIÉRREZ JUSTIFICA USO POLÍTICO DE LAS BECAS Mario Delgado, secretario de Educación, dijo a beneficiarios que la presidenta Sheinbaum les “manda” el dinero de las becas. El dinero, claro, sale del presupuesto público. Ahora Sergio Gutiérrez Luna, diputado de Morena, salió a justificarlo. Dijo que Delgado solo buscaba señalar quién impulsó esa política social. “Es simplemente señalar quiénes son las p…
🗳️📌 NUNCA DIJE NO AL FRACKING: SHEINBAUM “Nunca lo dije en campaña como tal”, 6 de agosto de 2026 "No va a haber fracking", 6 de diciembre de 2024 "No se va a permitir la explotación de hidrocarburos a partir del fracking", 1 de marzo de 2024.
🗳️📌 LA TRANSPARENCIA SELECTIVA DE SHEINBAUM Sheinbaum presentó un decreto de transparencia proactiva. Pero muchas de esas obligaciones ya existían. Y el problema principal sigue intacto. Es el propio gobierno quien decide qué información considera relevante publicar. Mientras tanto, la ley mantiene 17 causas para reservar documentos. Antes eran 13. La información puede ocultarse durante cinco años y recibir un…
🗳️📌 ARTURO ÁVILA DICE QUE BASTA CON LA DISCULPA ANTE DICHOS DISCRIMINATORIOS Arturo Ávila no considera necesario sancionar a Nayeli Salvatori y Grace Palomares. Las diputadas de Morena dijeron que adultos mayores “huelen a baúl” y “se están pudriendo”. Ávila dijo que lo dijeron en el marco de su libertad de opinión y que se queda con sus disculpas. Sostuvo que la Comisión de Honestidad y Justicia será la que deci…
🗳️📌 NOROÑA YA NO REPORTA CASA DE 12 MDP Noroña ya no declaró como inmueble su casa de 12 millones de pesos. Ahora solo reporta un préstamo personal por esa cantidad. Lo justificó así: mientras no termine de pagarla, “no es mía”. Video: gallegoso
🗳️📌 SHEINBAUM ADMITE QUE NO DA DINERO A MEDIOS CRÍTICOS Sheinbaum reconoció que no asigna publicidad oficial a TV Azteca, Reforma y El Universal. Dijo que los recursos se distribuyen según las audiencias de cada medio, pero aceptó que esos tres quedan fuera. También negó que pague a periodistas para hacer preguntas a modo. Una nueva versión de la clásica frase: "No te pago para que me pegues". Y también exhibe l…
🗳️📌 Sheinbaum informó que su gobierno hizo una investigación de usuarios y periodistas en redes sociales. "¿Qué cuentas son las que levantan una tendencia en X?", dijo la mandataria sobre el objetivo. Será presentado por Luisa Alcalde, hoy o el próximo miércoles.
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @juanortiznews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JUAN ORTIZ OFICIAL 🗳️👁🗨” (@juanortiznews), 3,417 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juanortiznews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.