Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JQF 私密SPA休闲会所

Channel

JQF 私密SPA休闲会所

@jqf6688

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,355subscribers

+207 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003464085883
TypeChannel
Username@jqf6688
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 19 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jqf6688

Growth

1,1481,7101,42915 August 2026 — 1,148 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,435 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,710 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,325 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,336 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,355 subscribers1,35515 August 202629 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net +207. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,064–1,794 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 20:321,355+19
26 Aug 2026, 10:581,336+11
23 Aug 2026, 15:541,325-385
19 Aug 2026, 18:521,710+275
16 Aug 2026, 19:171,435+287
15 Aug 2026, 19:151,148first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.0%
avg views ÷ 1,355 subscribers
Avg views / post
745
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 March 202615 August 2026)
Views total2,235
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7798.7%
🔥11.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC249 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🎰 禅城超高性价比94抽奖活动 📮 参与条件: 🎫 加入-佛山修车资源榜公开榜 🎫 加入-FS禅城精密SPA休闲会所JQF 🎫 加入-JQF 私密SPA休闲会所 🎫 加入-佛山修车资源交流群 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 16.8口令红包 × 3 💰️ 30元优惠券 × 10 💰️ 50元优惠券 × 5 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 1,本活动由会所部长赞助, 30优惠券报告随意发挥 50优惠劵报告300字以上 2、中奖者请联系 @tg99816 兑奖。 3,中半价券必须帮助老师写报告,否则永久拉黑。 4,开奖后请老师七天内兑券,转让需老师同意。 口令红包由群组提供,抽中联系 @fosgjp 兑奖 🍀 祝大家好运! 点击下方按钮参与抽奖 🔋 人品加成:⚡️⚡️⚡️ 规则 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年08月17日 17时58分00秒

15 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC≈3,570 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

恭喜这位老哥活动优质报告奖励,请老哥三天内联系我预约消费,到时直接抵扣100元,如超三天没预约则作废。

7 Jul 2026, 02:57 UTC≈3,720 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026

7月7号---7月15号 报告活动[色][色] 每位技师限一条报告,一条报告返现50💰,消费完留好预约记录和付款记录,cj前提前咨询好有没有报告位置。如没有提前预留报告位,写好了也没有的返。 报告要求:[加油][加油] 1、所写报告内容要丰富,细节要表达清楚,要求300字以上,如果只是照抄或者内容简单的话是没有返现的 2、写完报告后发给 @tg99816 进行审核。 审核完成后需发送到佛山大群大群列如: (佛山学生会)(佛山嫩妹)(佛山扶贫日记)(佛山御姐骑士团)(佛山修车资源) 之类的大群,你在哪个群找到我们会所的就发到哪个大群,自行找群主审核发布,发布成功后截图附带收款码[让我看看][让我看看] 额外惊喜福利[旺柴][旺柴]:此活动结束后在将选取一篇能把本部长的小牛仔看得棒棒硬的报告在额外返现100元现金,下次过来消费时直接抵扣就相当于实付269。 ⚠️⚠️注:参与活动的老哥麻烦看清楚要求在决定要不要参与活动 (

6

19 Jun 2026, 20:37 UTC≈4,650 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

05年嫩妹😊上新工号8号

2🔥1

29 May 2026, 13:37 UTC≈5,170 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

飞机消息回复不及时请加微信: Amoy6745 Cl3241502198 两个选择加一个就可以了 微信只预约 不发服务表之类的敏感话题

2

4 Apr 2026, 11:59 UTC≈11,100 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🥰佛山禅城 #岭南大道北📜JQF📜 🉑🉑战衣上阵🥰🥰 五星服务⭐️专业手法🐻 95后妹子🌷00后妹子👅 营业时间:12:00至05:00 ⭐️⭐️⭐️本店主打颜值牌 胸打👍 ✒🧡🧡💚🖤 💎94油项目 原价¥469现预约特价💵369🌟 特色:🉑服装指定,角色扮演,真空+黑丝(丁字裤)不穿打底裤,真69互👅,主打贴身,好玩刺激 😀😀服务内容:性感情趣服装🉑指定,艳舞互动,秀🦵秀臀 秀🐻,360度真🐻环游全身,鼻吸全身加骚叫床🛏️,👅滑全身,咪咪互👅互吸,一直舔👅到三角区 👅棒棒5~10分钟,冰火两重天,果冻毒🐲龙,🉑舔鱼,互舔互吸69互动,🐻胸 🦶足 手✋出💦,根据情况 可选各种姿势怎么刺激怎么来。出水💦两次😀 🪅激情双飞🔥特别项目🥰🥰 原价¥699🪙预约体验特价569💵 服务时间⏱️50分钟,服务内容:激情双飞💗,亲姐妹👠好闺蜜,激情艳舞互动🔥,抚摸中下路 高潮骚叫床🛏️,视

26

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jqf6688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,209,059 of 1,629,372entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JQF 私密SPA休闲会所” (@jqf6688), 1,355 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jqf6688.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.