Channel
@jpzlkf8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,796subscribers
-794 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002246142645 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jpzlkf8 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jpzlkf8 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 5,796 | -496 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 6,292 | -298 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 6,590 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 6,590 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (13 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#格林靓酷坊 提供7*24小时自动兑换 1️⃣自动兑换TRX转此钱包地址，转USDT自动回TRX，【TLttBorNCYvFp5fY9ZdBXTJjK3Y5555555 】（尾号为7个5） 2️⃣自动租赁能量可以节省80%TRX，如对方有USDT需要转4TRX一笔，如对方无USDT需要转8TRX一笔。【TCYUTm4jNrXC1yKJoQLgXPPGDgokkkkkkk】（尾号为7个k） 🔔开通TG会员需要在机器人获取地址钱包
🔥店铺满额阶梯折扣活动来袭，最高享7.5折！ 消费满1000元 → 9.5折 消费满2500元 → 9折 消费满5000元 → 8.5折 消费满10000元 → 8折 消费满20000元 → 7.5折 下单即享对应优惠，多买多划算！ 海外相册快速选品 👈👈点击此处
👏1
🍭亲，快来我的「小程序商城」看新品了~~ 高清大图，看款更带感 分类齐全，找款超简单
微购相册已重新整改品牌分类清晰目前只做男士商品，女士商品已停止更新。 另通知外贸网址已关由于开通需要费用近期外贸单较少，本店暂不开通。看商品统一识别微信二维码进入微购相册。 选好商品后在进行咨询，其余问题一律不回复，所有商品相册都有标价不用问东问西。 只做高端顶级商品，不要拿劣质商品来对比。有的人觉得几百块人民币贵，那是你的消费观问题。同样的商品有更低也有更高，在我这里就是相册价格，觉得是你喜欢的款式就赶紧下手吧！ 认准唯一店长微信：Lele2024168
飞机业务如下✈️ 僵尸粉/点赞/阅读/炒群/炸群/飞机号/老频道/在线人数/租赁能量/TG会员/闪兑TRX 在线咨询：@GL_LKF1 各位老板有需要点击加入 私密频道👉https://t.me/+wgWPPYQRYrQ4Yjdl
套装
套装
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @jpzlkf8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 212,484 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“高端品质大牌复刻男装” (@jpzlkf8), 5,796 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jpzlkf8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.