Channel
@jornadaintelectual
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,683subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001720439282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jornadaintelectual |
| Created | 4 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jornadaintelectual |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 1,683 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 1,685 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 1,689 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 1,691 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 1,691 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
168 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 72 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 17.3% | |
| 💊 | 19 | 11.3% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 9.52% | |
| ✍ | 15 | 8.93% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 5.36% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 14 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Não sinto mais vontade de produzir trabalhos “intelectuais” na internet por sentir que tudo isso pra mim foi tudo uma grande empulhação e perda de tempo de anos da minha vida. O fato é que chego aos 30 anos sem ter construído nada porque foquei em abstrações filosóficas, na política, nos problemas da Igreja, na internet, e nada prático. Arrumei um emprego, não é nada demais, é num supermercado. Daqui pra frente qu…
👍38✍13💊7🎉2💯1
Um ano do texto "Reflexões de um Millennial sobre a vida" https://jornadaintelectual.substack.com/p/reflexoes-de-um-millennial-sobre
👍3
Em breve sairá o terceiro post da série da série de relatos sobre o subemprego, e surpreendentemente será mais positivo que os dois primeiros. Por enquanto, deixo vocês com as edições anteriores: https://telegra.ph/Um-relato-sobre-o-subemprego-07-28 https://telegra.ph/Mais-um-relato-sobre-o-subemprego-02-28
👍2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZLE8DlRv8s
✍2👍1
Saiu novo post no Substack!!! https://jornadaintelectual.substack.com/p/eu-nao-entendia-o-comportamento-humano
❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
💯4👍2
https://open.substack.com/pub/jornadaintelectual/p/um-ano-de-jornada-intelectual
👍4
Hoje sai o post de um ano da nossa newsletter @jornadaintelectual
⚡5
Resenha em breve (se eu ler com consistência)
💊7👍1
Intenção de oração: Rezem pelo admin que voltou pra CLT
🎉5
Antes de sair de uma empresa, lembre-se de que no futuro vão te perguntar por que você saiu do trabalho anterior, e essa pergunta vai definir se você fica ou não no novo emprego.
💯7
Novo post no Substack!!! O grande problema da democratização das opiniões e do conhecimento, é que a grande maioria das pessoas não tem preparo filosófico, intelectual, cultural, educacional para a maioria das discussões que rolam pela internet e nem no mundo real; e ao mesmo tempo, essas pessoas estão por aí dando opinião. Leia mais: https://open.substack.com/pub/jornadaintelectual/p/da-agora-grega-ao-hospicio-bra…
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jornadaintelectual. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jornada Intelectual” (@jornadaintelectual), 1,683 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jornadaintelectual.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.