Channel
@jklzo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,868subscribers
-2,402 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002025600965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jklzo |
| Created | 28 December 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jklzo |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 5,868 | -110 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 5,978 | -224 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 6,202 | -201 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 6,403 | -102 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 6,505 | -113 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 6,618 | -138 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:44 | 6,756 | -107 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 6,863 | -134 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 6,997 | -257 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 7,254 | -802 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 8,056 | -225 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 8,281 | -316 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 8,597 | +261 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 8,336 | +66 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 8,270 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 28 December 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 89.5% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 10.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2023 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
با کلاسینو سر جلسه کنکور غافلگیر نمیشی!! بچه ها سوال اول رو ریییز دقت کنید ، سخت ترین سوال کنکور فیزیک امسال عینا و دقیقا در جزوه استاد براتی بوده! این شما و این 👇👇👇 تطبیق ۱۰۰درصدی سوالات کنکور تجربی ۴۰۵ با جزوه استاد براتی،بخش اول😍
جلسه 4 سالیانه جامع شجاعی آپدیت شد
جلسه 6 سالیانه یازدهم شجاعی آپدیت شد
نام دوره : #همایش_شجاعی_فیزیک1405 نام دبیر : شجاعی درس : فیزیک ━━━━━━━━━✦━━━━━━━━━ 🙂 جلسات همایش : 🟡جلسه 01 : « دریافت »🟡 🟡جلسه 02 : « دریافت »🟡 🟡جلسه 03 : « دریافت »🟡 ┈┅┅━━━━━━━━━✦━━━━━━┅┅┈ 💜@jklzo 💜
❌ جلسه اول همایش شیمی استاد مرادی ❌ با اختلاف ! بهترین همایش شیمی کنکور ! دست والتروایت استاد مرادی هستش👑 مرتب ترتمیز تک پارک پوشش کامل کل مباحث هرچیزی ک از صفر مشکل دارید و رفع میکنه♥️ 🔹دریافت PDF جزوه خام و پر بدون ربات🔹 ⬅️بودجه تدریس و بسته شده☝️ 🔹حفظیات دهم فصل یک ، دو ، سه 🔹مفاهیم دهم فصل یک ، دو ، سه 🔹حفظیات یازدهم فصل یک ، دو 🔹مفاهیم یازدهم فصل یک ، دو عقب مونده بازی درنیارید اگه شیمی صفرید تنها راه نجا…
❤1
جلسه ۳ فیزیک شجاعی آپدیت شد
🔴 نظر استاد پارسا فراهانی درباره آزمون خیلی سبز! 😎❤️ اگه دهمی، یازدهمی یا دوازدهمی‌ای، این ویدیو رو از دست نده! 😀🔥 آزمون حضوری + بیشترین تشابه سوالات با کنکور + طراحان برجسته کنکور 💪🏻💚 🎯 این ویدیو رو ببین قدم بعدی رو همین الان بردار!❤️ لیست نمایندگی آزمون‌های خیلی سبز⬇️ https://azmoonkheilisabz.com/representation
❤1
جلسه ۳ تا ۵ سالیانه یازدهم شجاعی آپدیت شد
کصخلی میری 1 تومن پول جزوه میدی؟؟! بیا با نصف قیمت رنگی چاپ کن اینجا👇 https://t.me/+UVMt08EHvnM3NzQ0 سیاه سفیدش هم یک چهارم قیمت جلدش میشه
Signed بدبختم :|
کنکورو بستید دیگه؟؟؟؟
Signed بدبختم :|
جلسه 02 فیزیک جامع شجاعی آپدیت شد دسترسی سریع
❤3
💜دوره : #سالیانه_عادی_فیزیک_جامع_شجاعی1406 👤 استاد : شجاعی 🔹موسسه : ماز 🔹راهنما↓ ┈┅┅━━━━━━━━━✦━━━━━━┅┅┈ جلسه 00 : « فیلم » | « جزوه » جلسه 01 : « فیلم » | « جزوه » جلسه 02 : « فیلم » | « جزوه » جلسه03 : « فیلم » | « جزوه » جلسه04 : « فیلم » | « جزوه » ┈┅┅━━━━━━━━━✦━━━━━━┅┅┈ 💜@jklzo 💜
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @jklzo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@jklzo edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فیزیک شجاعی 1406” (@jklzo), 5,868 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jklzo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.