Channel
@jiubo28pc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,198subscribers
-68 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002330365962 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jiubo28pc |
| Created | 15 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jiubo28pc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 2,198 | -49 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 2,247 | -19 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 2,266 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 15 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (15 February 2025 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 632 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2025 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#IOS漏洞事件 送彩金骗局针对苹果用户蔓延 深度分析，得出结论如下：早在4月份已经曝光过苹果系统漏洞被黑客攻破当时版本号风险漏洞为13-17版本风险，经历了4个月后黑客已经攻破到18-26系统区间，当前最新版本为26.6 事情始末：A手机系统版本号18，B手机系统版本号26.4 2台手机分别存放2个不同的钱包为什么会被同时前后10秒盗取？ 最后排查发现A手机在浏览网站的时候被病毒无感授权获得秘钥（这种病毒根本无需你打开助记词和密码即可全部获取你的秘钥） 应该注意什么？🛡 1：不要去点击任何网站，通过公开数据表明访问网站可以无感对版本号18以下的苹果手机无感植入，APP可以对26.2以下版本无感植入病毒直接获取秘钥 2：必须升级最新系统一刻不能怠慢 3：禁止多个设备用一个ID，苹果系统这点很垃圾可以被直接植入感染最新系统 4：禁止购买任何网上的ID，存在病毒可能性非常大 5：禁止下载一些小APP他们可能内置业务…
💩1
😀幸运时刻，不设预告 😀红包福利将会在不经意间降临 🔤 可能是现在 可能是下一秒 也可能是你刚好在线的时候 💰 😀惊喜不断、精彩不停，欢迎关注九博国际官方频道：官方频道 @jbgj 或加入官方 VIP 群，更多福利活动及不定时红包派送，等你来抢！
💩1
😀九博国际逢9好运金月月狂欢！ 😀即日起每个月的9号，19号，29号只要您在九博国际有充值流水，根据相应流水条件您都有3次抽取好运红包的机会，更有机会领取喜上加喜特殊奖励！（红包抽奖时间为：每月逢9当天北京时间下午14:00准时在九博vip群内发红包抽奖，红包金额🙂🙂🙂U， 数量按照在线人数来定。） 😀活动流水计算周期为：每月1-8号的流水9号抽奖，9-18号的流水19号抽奖，19到28号的流水29号抽奖，需活动期间在九博单个游戏流水达到总充值金额的三倍以上，极速红包牛牛0.5倍以上充值流水领取。并在抽奖当天抢到vip群活动红包，满足以下流水要求方可领取，多账号玩家仅限单个账号数据参加 🎁单个游戏流水达到 🎁领取 🟢1万U以上 🔣 🥰38U 🟢3万U以上 🔣 🥰88U 🟢6万U以上 🔣 …
😀恭喜玩家 ID：*****71 😀😀《赢财神》高倍爆奖！ 🥹仅需 🎰U 轻松一拉 🥹成功触发🎰🎰🎰 倍奖励 🥹本局盈利 🎰🎰🎰🎰U！ 🔥 小注试水，轻松起步 🔥 惊喜不断，精彩不停 ✅ 真实游戏记录
🎉1👍1🥰1
😀九博国际游戏活动总合辑 🇨🇦PC2.0活动合辑（活动详情） 🇨🇦PC2.8活动合辑 （活动详情） 🇨🇦pc网盘活动合辑 （ 活动详情 ） 🇨🇦PC满赔活动合辑 ( 活动详情 ） 🇨🇦PC满赔网盘活动合辑 （ 活动详情 ） 🎲极速骰子活动合辑 （ 动详活情 ） 🧧红包牛牛活动合辑 （ 活动详情 ） 🎰电子视讯真人活动合辑 （ 活动详情 ） 🎁以上活动合辑可（ 点击蓝字了解详情） 💰每个游戏活动众多，彩金无限 ————————————————————-- 🏆九博国际上下分群🏆 👩🏻💼九博客服： @j111 @j222 @j333 👩🏻💼彩金专员：@jiubocj1 @jiubocj2 @jiubocj3 ————————————————————- 📌具体活动详情请咨询客服 或者查看群内置顶单项活动，参与活动即是默认活动规则！
😀九博国际官方防骗通知 😀为保障广大用户的资金安全，请各位务必提高警惕，谨防冒充官方工作人员进行诈骗。 😀九博国际所有官方员工，包括： 官方客服、彩金专员、招商专员等工作人员。 😀均不会以任何理由主动向任何人提出借钱、转账、代付、垫付、资金周转、私人充值或其他任何形式的私人资金交易。 😀凡是以“九博国际工作人员”身份主动联系您，并提出借款、转账或其他资金往来要求的，请务必拒绝交易，切勿私下进行任何资金交易。 😀如遇可疑情况，请第一时间通过九博国际官方渠道联系投诉管理 @j888 @j999，避免造成不必要的资金损失，凡是举报情况核实属实，均可获得奖励。 😀请各位老板保护好个人账户信息及个人资金安全。切勿进行私下转账交易及合作，凡是私下合作导致资金受损被骗九博国际概不负责！！！望知悉！ 😀谨防冒充诈骗，共同维护安全、可靠的交流环境。 九博国际官方：@jbgj
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @jiubo28pc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 399 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“九博·中转导航” (@jiubo28pc), 2,198 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiubo28pc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.