Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

金坷垃 v2 公告

@jinkelanotify

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,014subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001448844913
TypeChannel
Username@jinkelanotify
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jinkelanotify

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@jinkelanotify/77 · this entry14 Jun 2025, 04:25 UTC@muguacloud/13414 Jun 2025, 04:25 UTC1.00under a minute
@jinkelanotify/79 · this entry10 Jul 2025, 06:45 UTC@muguacloud/13610 Jul 2025, 07:30 UTC1.0044 minutes
@jinkelanotify/81 · this entry15 Jul 2025, 10:29 UTC@muguacloud/13715 Jul 2025, 10:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@jinkelanotify/82 · this entry15 Aug 2025, 05:25 UTC@muguacloud/13815 Aug 2025, 05:25 UTC1.00under a minute
@jinkelanotify/84 · this entry30 Aug 2025, 02:08 UTC@muguacloud/14030 Aug 2025, 02:08 UTC1.00under a minute
@jinkelanotify/85 · this entry29 Sept 2025, 07:09 UTC@muguacloud/14129 Sept 2025, 07:09 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@muguacloud9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (90)
@biteb29 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (90)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 June 2025 to 16 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @muguacloud. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,0121,0141,0136 August 2026 — 1,012 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,012 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,014 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,012–1,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 00:291,014+2
6 Aug 2026, 23:161,012no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:061,012first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 04:40 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 6 August 2026

🎉🥢【端午 + 618 双节福利开冲!】🚀💥 粽子刚下肚,618 又来掏钱包了? 别慌,Ninja 直接给你们上点真家伙 😎👇 🔥 全场任意套餐立减 20%! 🎟 优惠码:20260618 ⏰ 活动截止:2026-06-23 23:59:59 ♻️ 不限制使用次数!想买几次买几次! 这波属于: 钱包说“不行了不行了”💸 手指说“我还能点”👆 脑子说“先冲再说”🤣 ⚠️ 重点提醒:套餐等级别买错!别一顿操作猛如虎,回头问我时间去哪了 😂 简单说就是:流量留下,时间换新老板了 👑😂 🚧 Ninja 2.0 升级版本 BETA 公测中! 🥷⚡️ 📢 请关注 TG 频道: 👉 https://t.me/ninja_ss2 Ninja 2.0 是基于 Ninja 1.0 重新打造的新版本, 这次内核重点升级,主要针对各种 “X盾” “N盾” 的检测和扫描进行优化 🛡👀 主打一个: 别人扫描:你在哪?🔍 Ninja:我在你看不见的地方 🫥

28 Apr 2026, 06:01 UTC≈3,940 viewsread 6 August 2026

【5.1 劳动节活动公告】 活动主题:不涨价,就是最大的活动 🫡 各位老板、各位打工人、各位深夜还在测速的朋友们: 五一劳动节到了,本来想搞个大促,想了想现在这个环境—— 不涨价,已经算我们在搞慈善了。 😂 最近大家应该也多少感觉到了: 铁拳压力越来越大,政策风向越来越玄,整个机场圈子接下来可能会迎来一波“革命性升级”—— 当然,也可能是另一种革命: 一觉醒来,老板连夜提桶跑路,群都改名叫“相亲相爱一家人”。 🪣💨 再加上目前资源紧张,各方面成本都在涨:机器涨、线路涨、维护涨,连客服的血压也在涨。 所以我们这次五一活动很简单: 🎉 5.1 劳动节活动:全场不涨价 没有满减,没有返现,没有抽奖,也没有“买一年送老板微信”。 主打一个朴实无华: 你没多花钱,我们已经很努力了。 🙏 也跟大家说点真心话: 以后买机场,真心建议大家: 月付为主,别冲太久。 有条件的话,多备几个备用。 不是我们不自信,是这个行业现在确实不适合

17 Apr 2026, 04:18 UTC≈3,670 viewsread 6 August 2026

涨价通知 2026/4/17 出于资源匮乏不得已涨价, 如果行情好转会回调, 目前各方面成本都在增加, 请大家谅解

5 Apr 2026, 04:06 UTC≈4,700 viewsread 6 August 2026

📢🚨 重要公告|请所有用户尽快完成切换 🚨📢 各位用户请注意 🙏 从 2026 年 4 月 1 日 起,线路环境再次明显收紧,情况比以前严重很多。现在已经不是以前那种“出了问题换机器、换 IP 还能继续扛”的阶段了。近一年多以来,订阅探测、协议探测越来越频繁 🔍⚠️,国内中转 / 专线入口一旦被通报,往往就是直接处理 ❌,几乎没有缓冲空间。 为了尽量保住线路、保证服务还能继续稳定运行 🛡🌐,我们决定: 🔥 即日起,所有用户必须统一切换到带 “Ninja” 字样的客户端 / 软件,并使用对应的 Ninja 订阅。 🔥 ✅ 后续专线线路只对 Ninja 客户端**开放。 ⛔️ 如果你使用的软件名称里 **不带 “Ninja”**,那么将 **无法继续使用专线业务**,只能走普通线路。 📉 这类情况下,常见体验就是:**延迟更高、不稳定、容易断开,甚至直接无法使用**。 🙏 这次调整不是为了折腾大家,而是当前环境下必须统一处

26 Feb 2026, 03:54 UTC≈5,400 viewsread 6 August 2026

3大运营商和监管部门开始上班了, 非ninja用户/客户端 => 请重新导入订阅 (ninja不用动)

12 Feb 2026, 06:37 UTC≈6,220 viewsread 6 August 2026

# 春节 大优惠活动: 优惠码: 2026XN 可以-20% 截止到 2026-02-28 23:59:59 如果订单报错可能每日限额封顶, 这种情况请第2天凌晨再下单试试

29 Dec 2025, 03:09 UTC≈7,650 viewsread 6 August 2026

# 元旦 大优惠活动: 优惠码: 20260101 可以-20% 截止到 2026-01-04 23:59:59 23:59:59

18 Nov 2025, 14:03 UTC≈8,970 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

cdn 故障导致很多web服务和api接口通讯失败, 全部离线, 耐心等

11 Nov 2025, 08:36 UTC≈6,050 viewsread 6 August 2026

# 双11 大优惠活动: 优惠码: 20251111 可以-20% 截止到 2025-11-17 23:59:59 非iOS/路由器 用户请尽快切换到 Ninja 魔改协议! 因为支付限额, 延续活动到17号晚上, 如果报500+错误码, 请等待限额重置后凌晨00:00后购买

5 Nov 2025, 03:27 UTC≈5,850 viewsread 6 August 2026

# 双11 大优惠活动: 优惠码: 20251111 可以-20% 截止到 2025-11-12 23:59:59 非iOS/路由器 用户请尽快切换到 Ninja 魔改协议!

12 Oct 2025, 04:55 UTC≈6,760 viewsread 6 August 2026

📢 重要公告 | 协议与客户端升级通知 各位用户好,为提升稳定性与抗干扰能力,我们正在推进新一轮升级,具体如下: 🛑 老协议维护策略 由于“通报”已呈常态化,我们 不再为老协议(如 VMess 等)新增线路或带宽,仅做必要维护,直至过渡完成后 逐步退役。 老协议将继续可用,但不再扩容,请尽快规划迁移。 🧩 新方案上线 魔改协议(定制) 与 魔改 Clash 已 陆续上线。 新协议采用 独立转发机器 与老协议 完全隔离(⚠️ 仍不排除所有风险,持续观察与优化)。 📱 iOS 进度 iOS 内核测试已通过 ✅。 受上架与审核周期影响,近期优先提供离线形态(订阅方式)。 过渡期内,iOS 请先使用老的订阅系统 + Shadowrocket(小火箭) 正常使用;上架完成后将指引迁移至新方案。 🚀 部署节奏与体验 新协议的线路将 每日持续部署,目标是 更低延时、更高稳定性。 我们会根据观测数据 滚动优化,确保体

29 Sept 2025, 07:09 UTC≈5,510 viewsread 6 August 2026

# 中秋+国庆 大优惠活动: 优惠码: 20251001 可以-20% 截止到 2025-10-07 23:59:59 同等级重复购买=时间+流量叠加 例:VIP1 青铜 → 再买 VIP1 青铜=在原有基础上叠加时长与流量 跨等级购买=立刻覆盖为新等级 VIP1 青铜 → 购买 VIP2=立即变为 VIP2 的时长与权益,不与原套餐叠加 建议:想跨等级更划算?先留言客服把账号升级到目标等级,再下单更稳妥

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jinkelanotify. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“金坷垃 v2 公告” (@jinkelanotify), 1,014 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jinkelanotify.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.