Channel
@jimiquan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,856subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001955733397 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jimiquan |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jimiquan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 2,856 | +16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 2,840 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 2,836 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 2,836 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 181 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#政策动态 美参议院本周将无悬念表决CLARITY加密法案，参议员Tim Scott确认日程安排 美国参议院银行委员会主席Tim Scott确认，本周内参议院将无争议地就CLARITY加密货币监管法案进行表决。尽管投票窗口紧张，多数党领袖仍保留议程空间，标志着美国加密监管立法迈出关键一步。 CLARITY法案加速推进，美国加密监管框架有望落地。 #美国 #参议院 #CLARITY法案 #加密货币监管 #政策动态
#安全警示 Coldcard硬件钱包生成随机数缺陷，持币者资金受损，闭源时代终结。 知名硬件钱包Coldcard因随机数生成器缺陷，导致部分用户资金失窃。 事件引发对“隐蔽即安全”的质疑，开源审计与透明机制成为信任基石。 建议用户立即检查固件，重视代码透明度。 闭源依赖已死，只有开源透明才能重建信任。 #比特币 #Coldcard #硬件钱包 #安全漏洞 #开源
#行业动态 BIP110提案引发争议，作者预判其将失败，三种情景推演聚焦OP_RETURN分歧。 BIP110提案争议升级，触及OP_RETURN核心分歧。 作者直言该提案无用且有害，预期最终失败。 文章梳理三种可能情景，旨在厘清软分叉背后的技术博弈与社区共识难题。 技术分歧加剧，软分叉前景黯淡。 #比特币 #BIP110 #OP_RETURN #技术争议 #软分叉
#安全警示 Coldcard耳机线漏洞致1.3亿美元被盗，号称“最安全”的硬件钱包信任危机初现。 知名离线硬件钱包Coldcard因物理连接漏洞遭黑客攻击。 攻击者通过伪造音频信号或接口异常，诱导用户错误签名，从而绕过安全措施。 ▪ 损失规模：约1.3亿美元 ▪ 涉及资产：主要是BTC ▪ 已受影响：部分早期型号 硬件安全非绝对，供应链与物理接口漏洞成新型攻击面。 #比特币 #Coldcard #硬件钱包 #安全漏洞 #加密快讯
#行业动态 Coldcard风波发酵，链上显示超21万枚比特币从旧钱包转出，引发关注。 据链上数据监测，受Coldcard安全事件影响，大量比特币长时沉淀于旧钱包地址。 近期链上记录显示，超过21万枚BTC发生异动并转移至新地址，市场高度关注后续流向及潜在抛压风险。 历史铸币转移暗示机构或大户调整持仓结构。 #比特币 #Coldcard #链上数据 #加密资产 #行业动态
#风控动态 Polymarket遭套利攻击，利用5秒延迟漏洞致数百万美元流失，平台紧急加固。 调查发现，攻击者利用Oracle数据从确认到可交易间的5秒延迟窗口，高频套利。 该漏洞导致数百万美元被套利，Polymarket已暂停相关市场并升级风控，加强实时校验逻辑以防止类似利用。 预言机延迟成隐形漏洞，高频套利倒逼平台加速技术迭代。 #Polymarket #套利漏洞 #预言机 #风控 #加密货币
#加密安全 Coldcard黑客沉寂数周后异动，转移30个比特币至新钱包。 Coldcard漏洞黑客近期出现资金异动。 该黑客目前持有约2,055枚（价值1.3亿美元）被盗比特币。自首次大规模窃取以来沉寂数周，此次突然行动，将30.185 BTC（约194万美元）转入全新钱包。 被视为近期唯一资金动作，或为后续清洗做准备。 沉寂后异动往往预示清洗前兆，链上动态需持续警惕。 #Coldcard #比特币盗窃 #加密安全 #黑客动向 #资产转移
#行业安全 Coldcard黑客事件后，比特币红队27小时挖掘390个项目4962个漏洞，含85个高危项。 志愿者安全组织“比特币红队”在27小时内，对390个开源比特币项目完成审计，检出4962个漏洞。 其中85个被定性为高危级别。此举旨在回应此前Coldcard硬件钱包因固件缺陷导致比特币被盗事件，全面排查行业风险。 该漏洞分布广泛，暴露出底层项目潜在安全隐患。 开源项目审计不能停，安全漏洞排查需常态化。 #比特币 #Coldcard #安全审计 #开源项目 #漏洞扫描
#政策动态 严查非法加密交易所，俄乌地缘博弈加剧，全球合规面临新挑战。 俄方打击涉嫌与乌克兰关联的无证加密交易所。 此举旨在切断资金流向，强化金融监管。 ▪ 无证平台面临清算 ▪ 跨境支付风险上升 ▪ 合规成本显著增加 加密行业合规窗口期收紧。 地缘冲突外溢，加密合规成全球硬约束。 #俄罗斯 #加密监管 #乌克兰 #合规政策 #区块链
#加密安全 Coldcard黑客沉寂数周后异动，转移194万美元被盗BTC，大额套现征兆现？ 链上数据显示，8月7日Coldcard作案钱包转移30.185 BTC（约194万美元）至新地址。 此举引发市场关注，因该钱包此前已长期处于静止状态。此次动币仅占涉案总量1.5%，但打破沉寂，暗示潜在的资金归集或分散动作。 市场分析人士指出，小额测试性转账往往是大规模套现前的典型前兆，需警惕后续波动。 小额试探性转账疑似为大规模套现做铺垫，市场需警惕后续波动。 #Coldcard #BTC被盗 #链上异动 #加密安全 #黑客攻击
#安全警示 加拿大用户占Coldcard漏洞损失25%，总被盗达1.16亿美元。 Galaxy Research追踪发现，该攻击源于2021年3月的一个固件版本更新。 作为受影响最严重的人群，加拿大持有者损失占比最高。 案件规模： ▪ 总资产被盗达1.16亿美元 ▪ 加拿大用户贡献25%损失 ▪ 属典型硬件钱包固件漏洞 硬件钱包固件安全至关重要，用户需及时更新补丁避免资损。 #Coldcard #硬件钱包 #加拿大 #固件漏洞 #资产被盗
#政策动态 Lummis参议员紧急施压，要求8月前通过CLARITY法案，以免推至2026年。 美国国会议员仅剩数日时间，需在8月休会前对加密市场结构法案进行投票。 若此时限错过，相关审议工作可能被推迟至2026年选举周期或更晚。 Lummis参议员正积极游说，试图在休会前促成表决，以避免监管真空期延长。 立法窗口紧迫，加密监管落地时不我待。 #美国 #加密监管 #CLARITY法案 #Lummis参议员 #政策动态
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jimiquan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,112,053 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“加密圈大事记” (@jimiquan), 2,856 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jimiquan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.