Channel
@jili65
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
927subscribers
+68 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003973386435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jili65 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jili65 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 927 | +60 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 867 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 859 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (30 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,474 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 92.6% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 7.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
---【💕基础信息】--- 时间：2026-08-22 老师：锦鲤 狼友：喜茶 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值：8 身材：8.6 态度：10 综合：8.87 ---【📝服务过程】--- 今天中午吃了个馒头，晕碳了。然后立马躺下睡着了。 做了个美梦，梦到了自己到了个锦鲤老师的门口。进门亲切的聊了二十多分钟，真的投缘。黑色吊带+白色内裤，诱惑的不行，赶紧洗澡去。轻柔的给慢慢的一点点洗好。然后老师递一张浴巾，自己再拿一个细致的给擦好。 然后开始爬下服务，吸皮过水我真的喜欢，吸到呻吟。掰开真毒龙到位。正面用突出的乳尖扫过全身，汗毛直立。口真的绝技了，要不是昨天出去散心时候不小心放水了，今天铁定扛不住口。一边服务一边聊天，一直到快忍不住了，带上安全措施开始女上。 不得不说，老师体力是真好，女上蹲坐不带停的。摸着奈奈跟细腰，真是享受。自己来了俩动作，累趴了，老师又上来自己服务，说来了的都不能不出走，对不起客人。最终顺利出来。 洗完继续聊…
开课啦。宝子们头课可约🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
❤1
🌸滴滴🌸宝宝们我休息了。一个星期后再约。😘😘😘😘
❤1
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌟 老师评价 🌟 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏷️ 1 👤 老师：锦鲤 (@jinli170) 🔗 主页：https://t.me/wuhanhua1/8540?single ⭐ 综合：★★★★★ 5/5 ├ 🎯 技能：★★★★☆ 4/5 ├ 💗 情绪：★★★★☆ 4/5 ├ 🏡 环境：★★★★★ 5/5 └ 📷 人照：★★★★☆ 4/5 📝 评价内容： 总体来说老师服务特别好，口活，和下面做起来非常舒服，在老师这里有两关，第一关口吹，一般人都过不了这一关，第二关下面会夹你！建议PP来闯两关！哈哈！身材特别棒！下次继续来😃 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🙋 评价人：一夜七次郎 (@Yp16888) 🕒 时间：2026-08-10 12:31 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 黄鹤楼群 @wuhanlou 技术聊天 @whlou6 武汉东湖 @whlou 工兵优惠 @whlou…
❤3
宝宝们开课了。可以开始预约位置💋💋💋💋💋💋💋💋💋💋
❤1🥰1
---【💕基础信息】--- 时间：2026-08-08 老师：锦鲤 狼友：芳心纵火犯 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值：8.5 身材：9 态度：10 综合：9.17 ---【📝服务过程】--- 课表上有的都有，态度很好，很负责。本来很难出的。女上把我榨出来了。很给力。口活特别棒 【优点】：口活很棒，身材也不错 【缺点/建议】：下次来一次胸推 【个人评价总结】：中上等，还不错 ❤️ 工兵团群友审美各不同，吾之蜜糖，彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头。
❤1
【时间】：2026-08-08 【老师】：锦鲤 【留名】：- one last kiss 【人照】：8 【颜值】：8 【身材】：10 【服务】：10 【态度】：10 【环境】：10 【综合】：9.33 【过程】：非常典型的御姐老师，个子很高，身材很好，属于是少有的那种有胸，但是没赘肉的老师； 重点得讲一下服务： 1、老师的皮肤很滑，状态好，并且胸非常有弹性，所以胸推非常爽，第一次胸推给我推硬了； 2、老式的毒龙很有一手能够感觉到，老师不仅仅只是在用舌头，而是用整个嘴巴； 3、口活有节奏，以前都是我三浅一深老师，这次被老师三浅一深了，着点给我口出来； 还有就是比较推荐后入老师，老师的身材挺不错的，后入能够很明显的感受到腰和屁股的视觉冲击； 整体非常的不错，是个值得回锅的老师，推荐服务控的狼友们无脑冲 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy
每月一验。宝宝们约课放心，我上课也安心💋💋💋💋💋
❤1
开课了。宝贝们可以开始预约位置❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
❤1
谢谢宝宝的肯定。💋💋💋💋💋
❤2
---【💕基础信息】--- 时间：2026-08-07 老师：锦鲤 狼友：阿信 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值：8.8 身材：10 态度：10 综合：9.6 ---【📝服务过程】--- 胸是真凶胸，有C，老师吹特别的厉害，如果控制不好的兄弟建议约pp，95一套流程都有做老师服务态度很好，毒龙也很舒服，日感非常棒，这也是我在武汉日了六个里面最爽的一个，推荐兄弟们放心冲，还会二刷。 【优点】：交流过程不冷场。 服务确实太牛逼了。身材很棒，奶子大得很。 【缺点/建议】：缺点太会吹了，差点两次不够日 【个人评价总结】：这个价格能享受到这个服务，物超所值。 ❤️ 工兵团群友审美各不同，吾之蜜糖，彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头。
❤1
---【💕基础信息】--- 时间：2026-08-07 老师：锦鲤 狼友：琴箱鼓手李 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值：8 身材：9 态度：9 综合：8.67 ---【📝服务过程】--- 早上10点30约的头课，预感今天要中奖；果然中了100的代金券。提前一天就想来这里上课，所以没等开奖就来了。老师长得很高，很苗条，但是🐻却不小，真实有C，真🐻。进入房间后，老师让我坐下，拿了水，简单的聊了会天，然后就帮我洗。洗完后，就爬上床，开始做AB面，值得好评的是，老师做B面的时候有用精油。介绍里面有的内容应有尽有；顺势而为，老师咬到我的牛时，那口活绝了；很少有老师能把我咬到快射的感觉；然后带上小雨伞，老师施展观音坐莲；后来又换来姿势再来，前后差不多10多分钟出水。出水后，并没有潦草结束，并且给你按摩很久。 【优点】：十分享受的过程，特别是事后按摩这个环节，好久没体验过了 【缺点/建议】：忘了给我水中萧😂 【个人评价总结】：在5p这个价位…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jili65. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,427,108 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“锦鲤的小屋（个人莞式服务） 🥰🥰🥰” (@jili65), 927 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jili65.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.