Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 佳乐的家园

Channel

佳乐的家园

@jiale0009211

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,882subscribers

+167 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003803933015
TypeChannel
Username@jiale0009211
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jiale0009211

Growth

1,7151,8821,798.57 August 2026 — 1,715 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,715 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,719 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,778 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,882 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +167. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,690–1,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:071,882+104
10 Aug 2026, 21:521,778+59
8 Aug 2026, 03:541,719+4
7 Aug 2026, 21:021,715no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:171,715first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.5%
avg views ÷ 1,882 subscribers
Avg views / post
669
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.461%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total10,028
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥531.3%
318.8%
👍318.8%
💯212.5%
🤗16.25%
🤩16.25%
🥰16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC251 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GZNMMTL

【嫩妹报告】https://t.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】天河美乐 【联系方式】@jiale000921 【所在位置】冼村 【验证留名】匿 【验证时间】8.7 【修车费用】500 【颜值身材】胸很挺,腰很细, 【服务内容】不过分的要求都会满足 【服务态度】老师很主动,不会催,不会摆脸色 【优点缺点】无缺点,第一次紧张,但事后很舒服 【推荐程度】推荐 【体验细节】第一次出击,左挑右选便看到了美乐老师,地方很好找,环境干净,一进门眼前一亮,老师很温柔很热情,一点不觉得尴尬,付费洗澡,老师主动配洗,洗的也很仔细。由于是第一次什么都不懂,躺在床上以后老师便对我进行服务,老师很骚,刚摸上就硬的不行了,老师用温柔的小舌头舔遍全身,口技非常棒,舔的非常舒服,差点没忍住就射了,完后老师骑上来开整,女上非常舒服,能顶到底,小穴很湿,快忍不住了便把老师转过来按到床上猛干一通,小穴太润,没几下就射了,老师的颜值和技术都奈斯,下次还会再来

👍1💯1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC353 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

今日 已🈵哦 宝贝们 有鸽子频道通知,可以约明天哦😘

🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC438 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GZNMMTL

【嫩妹报告】https://t.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】天河美乐 【联系方式】@jiale000921 【所在位置】冼村 【验证留名】刘.学生 【验证时间】8.7 【修车费用】500 【颜值身材】身材很好,很瘦,🐻很饱满 【服务内容】课表内容,有的都有 【服务态度】非常主动,很配合,全程不尴尬 【优点缺点】身材很好,皮肤又滑又嫩,下面无异味,水很多 【推荐程度】推荐 【体验细节】提前一天和美乐约好时间,课室很好找,到电梯口直接遥控上门,开门进来后,第一眼的感觉就是老师穿的非常性感,皮肤白嫩细腻,上面那对粉嫩的玉兔便是若隐若现,短裙下洁白修长的大腿也是非常诱人,瞬间就感觉来对了。先洗澡,妹妹也进来一起帮弟弟洗澡,看着我那急不可耐的弟弟,妹妹二话不说,直接蹲下来一口含住,妹妹看起来很有技巧,我从未有过如此美妙的体验,直到我实在受不了,才主动要求到床上。 上床之后,妹妹让我躺着,然后继续服务,时而漫游、时而舔蛋蛋,69时口

🔥21💯1

6 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC847 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GZNMMTL

【嫩妹报告】https://t.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】天河美乐 【联系方式】@jiale000921 【所在位置】冼村 【验证留名】大风 【验证时间】8.6 【修车费用】500 【颜值身材】瘦,胸和屁股很有料 【服务内容】课表内容有的都有 【服务态度】听话,细心,温柔 【优点缺点】无缺点,闭眼冲 【推荐程度】10分, 【体验细节】无意间点开群里看到美乐的好评,看照片太对我胃口了,有点心动,果断约课,奈何老师刚刚开课太忙了,结果还是等到了第二天,到达 gzs停车很方便,遥控上楼,开门第一眼愣了一下,就是上大学那种遇见心动女生的那种 紧张了一下,真人有点让我惊喜,年纪看上去很小,穿着灰色小裙子和灰色吊带 ,脸上化了妆很淡,翩若惊鸿,让我惊为天人,胸部鼓鼓的 很有料,整个人让我愣在原地,美乐以为我不满意,问我可以吗,冷静下心跳先和妹子闲聊几句 暖下场,感受下,但是美乐很会找话题,不会上双方都很尴尬,接着开始脱衣服,一看胸

1👍1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC772 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

宝贝投喂的下午茶,开始进食🤗

🤩1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC812 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GZNMMTL

【嫩妹报告】https://t.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】天河美乐 【联系方式】@jiale000921 【所在位置】冼村 【验证留名】阳 【验证时间】8.6 【修车费用】1000 【颜值身材】完美,167左右90多斤 【服务内容】都有 【服务态度】从聊天就能感觉到很温柔 【优点缺点】无缺点,很嫩 【推荐程度】推荐 【体验细节】想约美乐好久了,但是之前总没空,等到休息回归果断约了个头课,我本身比较慢热,约了pp,和美乐约好时间。美乐对接的态度一直都很好,很温柔很体贴,见到本人多少带点惊艳,一身白色吊带,清纯白嫩感像初恋一样的感觉,我有点紧张,美乐安抚着我坐着,付水费后,去冲洗,美乐提前帮我放好热水,拿好浴巾,等着我出来,拉着我躺在床上,房间很温馨,像是自己家一样。美乐躺在我身边,用手拂过我的身体,轻轻的抚摸,小嘴巴舔舔的在乳头,很舒服很享受。插进来的感觉是很爽的,温热紧致滑润,女上,后入,侧入,后入,感受都很深刻美妙,

1👍1🤗1

6 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC640 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✅昵称:#美乐 📍地区:#天河 😘水费:#500p ✈️电报: @jiale000921 📣标签:嫩妹🉑舌吻 🉑69 ☎️预约上课

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @jiale0009211. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 949,814 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“佳乐的家园” (@jiale0009211), 1,882 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiale0009211.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.