Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ_๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐——

Channel

๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ_๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐——

@jgggvvffvv

2 usernames

On this record: Topic ยท Previous handles ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

20,070subscribers

+862 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002004053807
TypeChannel
Usernames@jgggvvffvv @ugguffjfch
DescriptionFARIDABAD SINGLE--๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ– JOIN KARO SARE BHAI FAST
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held10
On Telegramt.me/jgggvvffvv

Topic

Gambling & betting โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@jgggvvffvv was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today โ€” only that this channel no longer does.

@iikekkfrkkrk
held 27 August 2026 โ€“ 27 August 2026

Growth

19,07320,07019,571.527 August 2026 โ€” 19,208 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 19,202 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 19,180 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 19,136 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 19,087 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 19,073 subscribers19 September 2026 โ€” 19,947 subscribers19 September 2026 โ€” 19,947 subscribers29 September 2026 โ€” 20,070 subscribers29 September 2026 โ€” 20,070 subscribers27 August 202629 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 33 days, net +862. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 18,923โ€“20,220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 09:2220,070no change
29 Sept 2026, 08:4720,070+123
19 Sept 2026, 07:2219,947no change
19 Sept 2026, 06:4719,947+874
1 Sept 2026, 08:1419,073-14
31 Aug 2026, 08:5719,087-49
30 Aug 2026, 07:3419,136-44
29 Aug 2026, 04:0719,180-22
28 Aug 2026, 00:5419,202-6
27 Aug 2026, 17:3019,208first reading

Engagement

89 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
4.55%
avg views รท 20,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
914
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.963%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 89 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held89 (26 August 2026 โ€“ 29 September 2026)
Views total42,936
Reactions total405
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
20
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

1,008 reactions across 84 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค84183.4%
๐Ÿ‘747.34%
๐Ÿ”ฅ323.17%
๐Ÿ‘Œ222.18%
๐Ÿ‘191.88%
๐Ÿ™90.893%
๐Ÿ•Š50.496%
๐Ÿ’˜30.298%
โšก10.099%
๐ŸŽ‰10.099%
๐Ÿ’”10.099%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 1,008 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC372 views9 reactionsread 29 September 2026

โ•ญโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฎ ๐‹๐ˆ๐Š๐„ ๐Š๐€๐‘๐Ž ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐ŸŽ โ•ฐโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฏ

โค5๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed ๐—”๐—”๐—•๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC402 views12 reactionsread 29 September 2026

เคฆเคฟเคฒเฅเคฒเฅ€ เคฌเคพเคœเคพเคฐ เคถเฅเคฐเฅ€ เค—เคฃเฅ‡เคถ ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š๐—”๐—Ÿ--๐Ÿ•๐ŸŽ โœ… ๐ŸŸก ๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ‘----๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ“ ๐ŸŸก ๐—ง๐—›๐—ข๐—ž๐—ข ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ž๐—˜๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ

โค7๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘Œ1

Signed ๐—”๐—”๐—•๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC413 views6 reactionsread 29 September 2026

โ•ญโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฎ ๐‹๐ˆ๐Š๐„ ๐Š๐€๐‘๐Ž ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐ŸŽ โ•ฐโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฏ

โค2๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐—”๐—”๐—•๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC383 views5 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ”ฅ2โค1๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐—”๐—”๐—•๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC397 views7 reactionsread 29 September 2026

โ•ญโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฎ ๐‹๐ˆ๐Š๐„ ๐Š๐€๐‘๐Ž ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐ŸŽ โ•ฐโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฏ

โค2๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ‘Œ1

Signed ๐—”๐—”๐—•๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC400 views7 reactionsread 29 September 2026

เคฆเคฟเคฒเฅเคฒเฅ€ เคฌเคพเคœเคพเคฐ เคถเฅเคฐเฅ€ เค—เคฃเฅ‡เคถ ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š๐—”๐—Ÿ--๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ’ โœ… ๐ŸŸก ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ--๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“--๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ ๐ŸŸก ๐—ง๐—›๐—ข๐—ž๐—ข ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ž๐—˜๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ

โค2๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ™1

Signed ๐—”๐—”๐—•๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC408 views5 reactionsread 29 September 2026

โ•ญโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฎ ๐‹๐ˆ๐Š๐„ ๐Š๐€๐‘๐Ž ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐ŸŽ โ•ฐโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฏ

โค2๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐—”๐—”๐—•๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC408 views4 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed ๐—”๐—”๐—•๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 04:43 UTCโ‰ˆ1,000 views3 reactionsread 29 September 2026

๐Ÿ‘†

โค2๐Ÿ‘Œ1

Signed ๐—จ๐—ž ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 04:02 UTCโ‰ˆ1,040 views18 reactionsread 29 September 2026

โ•ญโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฎ ๐‹๐ˆ๐Š๐„ ๐Š๐€๐‘๐Ž ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ”‚ โ•ฐโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฏ ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ

โค12๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐—”๐—”๐—•๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTCโ‰ˆ1,050 views41 reactionsread 29 September 2026

โšก๏ธเคฆเคฟเคฒเฅเคฒเฅ€ เคฌเคพเคœเคพเคฐ เคถเฅเคฐเฅ€ เค—เคฃเฅ‡เคถ โšก๏ธ เคธเคฟเค‚เค—เคฒ ๐ŸŒ™ { ๐Ÿ—๐Ÿ” } ๐ŸŒ™ เคฏเคน เคœเฅ‹เคกเคผเฅ€ เค‡เคธเค•เฅ‹ เค•เคฟเคธเฅ€ เคญเฅ€ เคนเคพเคฒ เคฎเฅ‡เค‚ เค–เฅ‹เคฒเคจเฅ€ เคชเคกเคผเฅ‡เค—เฅ€ โœˆ๏ธโœˆ๏ธโœˆ๏ธโœˆ๏ธโœˆ๏ธ เค…เค‚เค—เฅ‚เค เคพ เคฆเคฌเคพ เคฆเฅ‹โค๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ“ฑ

โค30๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿ’˜3๐ŸŽ‰1๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed ๐—”๐—”๐—•๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

29 Sept 2026, 03:55 UTCโ‰ˆ1,050 views12 reactionsread 29 September 2026

โ•ญโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฎ ๐‹๐ˆ๐Š๐„ ๐Š๐€๐‘๐Ž ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐ŸŽ โ•ฐโ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ•ฏ

โค5๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ•Š1

Signed ๐—จ๐—ž ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ

Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @jgggvvffvv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Sept 2026, 05:51 UTCAnonymous Poll56 voters

โค๏ธ

  1. ๐’๐ˆ๐๐†๐„๐‹59%
  2. ๐Ÿ ๐ฃ๐จ๐๐ข50%
  3. ๐Ÿ’ ๐ฃ๐จ๐๐ข14%
  4. ๐๐จโค๏ธ9%

The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

เคธเคฟเค‚เค—เคฒ เคฌเฅเคฒเคพเคธเฅเคŸ
@jxnxnnxnn ยท 46,348
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 53 here โ€” alongside 52 others โ€” read 27 August 2026
MAHAKAL SATTA โค๏ธ( DESAWAR DISAWAR )
@DESAWAR_SATTA ยท 102,318
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 63 here โ€” alongside 62 others โ€” read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ_๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐——โ€ (@jgggvvffvv), 20,070 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jgggvvffvv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.