R*ord pi*es *pa Cip" https://t.me/Asadekonviral_bot?start=Z2V0LTEwMTM4NzgyMjk5OTI3Ng

Channel
πππ₯π₯π¬ | #π ππππ
@jerryvirall
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry
40,248subscribers
+208 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002692688969 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jerryvirall |
| Description | β οΈ Disclaimer : All The Content in this Channel is Either forwarded From Other Channels Or Taken From the Internet, we Don't Own Any Content. βNo copyright infringement intendedβ |
| Created | 10 September 2025 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jerryvirall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 40,248 | +208 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 40,040 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 40,040 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 10 September 2025 β the reader has reached the start of this channelβs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 7 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 2.36%
- avg views Γ· 40,248 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 951
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.041%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 34
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (10 September 2025 β 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 32,344 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 11:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 21
- Links
- 20
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 9 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 26 | 92.9% | |
| π | 2 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2025 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
B*JR O"3W P"KE B"OL AP" INI https://t.me/chindobrutBot?start=Z2V0LTIwMjQwNzg0NDA5MjE3ODQ1
l*ve s*bil tel"jβ’ng biar d"pet mak"n b"yk gi"t https://t.me/media_viral_ast_bot?start=Z2V0LTE3MTQ2MzE5NjkxODc4MQ
H*JAB VIR*L DI"YANG AY"NG https://t.me/febria_bot?start=Z2V0XzI0M18tMTAwMzE2NjkxMTA4MA
MA*H U*AH SEM*TEP PU*N INI CL*NYA https://t.me/pekobnesiabot?start=Z2V0LTE5ODYxNjQ0MTY3MTA3Nzc4
U*TIE NG*SKUY https://t.me/Linkasupanviral67_bot?start=Z2V0LTE2MjU3MTIzODY5Mjc0MA
Di*akin ke h"tel b"eng pa"a m"tua https://t.me/BlinderhitamBot?start=Z2V0XzExMTlfLTEwMDE5MjM1ODQ1MzY
HIJ*ERS J$GI BN*ET NIH N*SEPNYA "EH https://t.me/guacapewoiBA3bot?start=Z2V0LTIwMjU4ODM0MTU1MDM3MzEx
Hijab live https://t.me/Streaming_VideoRobot?start=aWQtNjM1NzE2NTA2ODM4NzM0
Flwrszyln https://t.me/MafiaAsupanRobot?start=Z2V0cHJlbS0xNDM1MzQyNzQ1NTE4Njk0LTE0NDczOTYwMDg2MDIxMjY
ciwinya jago serfong sampe luber berakhir tembak dimulut kesenangan ssmpe di telen https://t.me/DINOORENVIRALBOT?start=Z2V0LTE3MDYzNDQzOTQ4MDk5
Atifah https://t.me/MafiaAsupanRobot?start=Z2V0cHJlbS0xMzA3Nzc5MDQ0NTUyMzcyLTEzMTQ4MTAxMTQ2ODQzNzQ
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @jerryvirall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππ₯π₯π¬ | #π ππππβ (@jerryvirall), 40,248 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jerryvirall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.