Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jamie

Channel

Jamie

@jamierochefort

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,196subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001854984445
TypeChannel
Username@jamierochefort
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jamierochefort

Growth

4,1964,2094,202.57 August 2026 — 4,209 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,209 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,206 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,207 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,204 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,197 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,198 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,196 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 25 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,194–4,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 07:434,196-2
26 Aug 2026, 06:124,198+1
23 Aug 2026, 09:434,197-7
17 Aug 2026, 11:554,204-3
13 Aug 2026, 23:374,207+1
10 Aug 2026, 10:134,206-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:274,209no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:014,209first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,270 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,23454.4%
🔥75033.0%
👍1064.67%
👏1014.45%
🤯542.38%
🤩120.529%
🎉80.352%
😁50.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,270 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 16:58 UTC≈2,620 views243 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Real growth requires you to disappear. Not the performative growth displayed on social media. A genuine quantum leap. The kind that changes your family’s trajectory forever. Stop fucking around. Stop chasing validation. Stop watching everyone else. Lock the world out. Lock yourself in. Focus.

175🔥43👍14👏11

2 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC≈4,330 views180 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Don’t rush. You can hit your yearly target in a month. You can hit your monthly target in a day. The mistake is thinking progress requires constant action. It doesn’t. Trading rewards timing, not activity. If the model isn’t there, doing nothing is the work. If the model is there, execution is simple. Professionals understand that results come in windows. You wait for the window. You execute when it opens.

141🔥19👍18👏2

2 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC≈3,370 views131 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I haven’t taken a trade in two weeks. Not because the market has been quiet. It hasn’t. There have been setups. But experience teaches you the difference between something that looks like a setup, and something that actually qualifies. If the trade is valid according to my protocol, I take it. No hesitation. No emotion. No discretion. But if it does not meet the standard, I stand down. That is the point of

92🔥21👍10👏8

18 Jun 2026, 14:33 UTC≈4,520 views203 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

This was my only trade of the week. It ended as a loss. Price clipped me by 17 points, then ran straight to target. That is trading. Sometimes you can do everything right and still lose. Sometimes your read is right, but the market gives you no seat on the move. In a strange way, I’ve started to look forward to moments like this. Not because I want to lose. But because every clean loss is an opportunity to pr

151🔥28👏20👍3🤯1

12 Jun 2026, 16:58 UTC≈4,510 views128 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Time gives you the WHEN. Price gives you the WHERE. That's why it is Time then Price.

🔥7840👍5👏3🎉1😁1

12 Jun 2026, 16:55 UTC≈4,180 views141 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The answer is: AMD. Accumulation. Manipulation. Distribution. Each phase occurs within a specific time cycle. My favourite AMD cycle is: 07:30 - 09:00 Accumulation. 09:00 - 10:30 Manipulation. 10:30 - 12:00 Distribution. Every single high probability market maker model unfolds due to AMD. Not only is AMD the key, it is the mechanics of the market and occurs on every single time cycle which means you can invest

99🔥32🤯5👏3🎉1👍1

12 Jun 2026, 15:10 UTC≈3,780 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

If you know the answer, let me know: https://x.com/jamierochefort/status/2065451599380537457

🔥329👏3

12 Jun 2026, 15:08 UTC≈3,720 views82 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

1 Loss & 1 Win Today = +242 Points Net ✅ If you look at all of my trades this year, what do you notice in every single one? If you find it, you have found the key. $NQ AM MMBM London Purge & Revert Model 12th of June 2026

62🔥13🤯4👏3

11 Jun 2026, 14:15 UTC≈3,320 views82 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Small win today. $NQ delivered the target, and $ES failed to catch up. We move. $ES AM MMBM London Purge & Revert Model 11th of June 2026

🔥5124👏6🤯1

10 Jun 2026, 16:01 UTC≈3,270 views130 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

+328 points at 8:1 RR ✅ Trailed stop hit in profit due to the SMT at the lows with ES. Trailed stop was placed above the 11:50 high which formed inside of an imbalance. Not being greedy when price is delivering with such large ranges. $NQ AM MMSM 07:30-09:00 Purge & Revert Model 10th of June 2026

73🔥33👍8👏6🤯6🎉4

8 Jun 2026, 14:49 UTC≈3,380 views118 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Starting off the week with a 💥🏌️ $NQ AM MMBM 8th of June 2026

72🔥33👏12🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jamierochefort. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Romeotpt
@officialRomeotpt · 53,301
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 24 August 2026
Trader Theory
@tradertheory · 31,548
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
Shinobi Signals
@ShinobiSignals · 32,910
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jamie” (@jamierochefort), 4,196 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jamierochefort.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.