In 1965, a company from Ivrea showed New York a machine that fit on a desk and could be programmed like a computer. It was the Olivetti Programma 101. Some call it an early personal computer, others a programmable calculator. Around 44,000 were sold, mostly in the US. NASA even used it for calculations on the Apollo 11 mission. The Programma 101 was an early example of personal computing, developed in Italy and sol…

Channel
it.com Domains
@itcom
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
21,574subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001319456159 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @getitcom_channel @itcom |
| Description | Official Channel of it.com Domains get.it.com Get your own memorable and keyword-rich .it.com domain! Contact us: [email protected] Follow us: x.com/itcomdomains instagram.com/itcomdomains facebook.com/itcomdomains |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itcom |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 05:01 | 21,574 | -4 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 21,578 | +1 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:41 | 21,577 | no change |
| 2 Oct 2026, 07:01 | 21,577 | -1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 10:42 | 21,578 | -13 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 21,591 | -1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 21,592 | -2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 21,594 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 21,596 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 21,597 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 21,597 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 21,595 | no change |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 21,595 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 21,593 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 21,595 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 21,594 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:06 | 21,601 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 21,599 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:04 | 21,596 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 21,598 | first reading |
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.32%
- avg views ÷ 21,574 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 284
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.34%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (8 June 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,407 |
| Reactions total | 78 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 16:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 123
- Links
- 87
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
312 reactions across 51 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 32.4% | |
| 👍 | 88 | 28.2% | |
| 🔥 | 70 | 22.4% | |
| 🤩 | 33 | 10.6% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 3.85% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.962% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.962% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
A detail from this year's new gTLD round that slipped under the radar: around 1,100 of the ~1,600 applications included a fallback option. If several applicants want the same extension and one would rather not go to auction, they can switch to a backup string instead.
❤2👍1
AI can generate content in minutes. It cannot automatically keep pace with how a startup’s product, customers, and positioning evolve. Our CEO Andrey Insarov looks at why communicators still matter in his latest Forbes Business Council article. Read ↩️
❤4👍3🔥3🤩1
Ever changed your DNS and wondered why it took hours to work everywhere? That's TTL, the ""time to live"" on a record. It tells servers how long to hold the old value before checking for a new one. For a big move, lowering it ahead of time can help the switch happen faster, but if the previous value was set for longer, some DNS resolvers may still hold the old value in their caches until that period expires. Ever sa…
❤1
Italy's two-letter country code, IT, happens to be a real English word too. It's a small linguistic quirk that makes certain names read naturally in English as well as Italian. From Olivetti's engineering to the design the country is known for, function and identity have long gone hand in hand here.
❤2👍2
That study finding 58% of people couldn't reach a site because they couldn't spell the domain is worth a proper look. The breakdown of what tripped people up: 30% blamed a name that didn't match the brand, 29% blamed length, 26% odd or unusual spelling, and 20% numbers or hyphens. The extension itself came last, at just 14%. How a domain sounds when you say it out loud matters more than how clever it looks written …
👍3❤1
Italian tech is having a good stretch. In the first half of 2026, the country's startups pulled in hundreds of millions in investment. A good marker of the moment: Milan-based Bending Spoons listed on Nasdaq in July, in an IPO of around $1.7 billion. It's one of the larger European tech listings in recent years, and not bad for a company five friends started back in 2013 with $40,000. From Milan to Turin, companies…
❤4🔥4👏2
In Marostica, northern Italy, they've played chess with people as the pieces for over 100 years! Over 650 performers in 15th-century costumes fill a giant marble board in the town square, re-enacting a legend where a woman's hand in marriage came down to a single game. It runs every two years in a 3,600-seat amphitheatre built against a medieval castle, with the latest edition taking place in September. High stakes…
❤3👍3🔥2
🚀 From 150,000 to 200,000 domains since Q1 2026! it.cоm has grown by 33% at remarkable speed, supported by a registrar network of 50+ partners across more than 150 countries. Its customers range from tech companies to creators and Italian businesses looking for a memorable online identity. Read ↩️
👍4🔥4❤1
A mix-up worth clearing up: your domain and your hosting are two separate things. The domain is your address. The hosting is the actual house the site lives in. They usually get bought together, so it's easy to assume they're one thing, until someone tries to move house and panics they'll lose the address too. You won't. You can pack up the whole site, move it to a new host, and keep the same name on the mailbox. D…
👍5❤2🤩2
Our CEO Andrey Insarov shared a thought in Forbes on what top talent really wants: "Stop hiring stars and asking them to dim their light." Full piece here ↩️
👍5🔥2🤩2
August Industry Digest is out 🌐 Around 1,600 new gTLD applications, a study showing 58% of people lose sites they can't spell, and two Google search updates. Full digest ↩️
❤5🔥4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @itcom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“it.com Domains” (@itcom), 21,574 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itcom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.