Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

İsuda

@isuda20

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

16,692subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001163356333
TypeChannel
Username@isuda20
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/isuda20

Growth

16,69216,71016,7016 August 2026 — 16,706 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,706 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,710 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,702 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,698 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,692 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 6 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,689–16,713 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:3416,692-6
11 Aug 2026, 23:3116,698-4
10 Aug 2026, 20:0616,702-8
8 Aug 2026, 18:0016,710+4
7 Aug 2026, 18:3716,706no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:3116,706first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 00s
Average length
2m 00s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11952.2%
👍7934.6%
👏125.26%
🔥41.75%
😢41.75%
🤬41.75%
🏆20.877%
🤯20.877%
10.439%
🥰10.439%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,880 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @dogaldogum

Ultrasound güvenliliği kanıtlanmamış, tehlikeleri yeteri kadar araştırılmamış bir teknolojidir! https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/prenatal-ultrasound-not-so-sound-after-all/

👍52

12 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @dogaldogum

1 Ultrasound = 250 tane Göğüs Röntgeni kadar DNA Hasarı https://www.electricsense.com/ultrasound-pregnancy-risks/

12 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,970 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Ultrasound güvenliliği kanıtlanmamış, tehlikeleri yeteri kadar araştırılmamış bir teknolojidir!

4👍2🥰1

12 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,680 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @childrenshdVideo

Learn more about the dark side of prenatal ultrasound with Jeanice Barcelo on #CHDTV Full Episode ⏯️ https://bit.ly/3TmC0pt

2👍2

12 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 13 August 2026

Ultrasound güvenliliği kanıtlanmamış, tehlikeleri yeteri kadar araştırılmamış bir teknolojidir! https://open.substack.com/pub/drtenpenny/p/jeanice-barcelo-birth-trauma-and

26 Jun 2026, 06:34 UTC≈2,870 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

11👏6

26 Jun 2026, 06:24 UTC≈2,630 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026

23. Bunun üzerine Mahkeme tarafından dosyanın tekrar ele alındığı anlaşılmaktadır. Mahkeme ek kararında yapılan müdahalenin tıbbi müdahale olduğunu, tıbbi müdahaleler açısında aydınlatma ve rıza şartının arandığını belirtmiştir. Bu kapsamda yasal mevzuat ile Yargıtay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin E.2014/149, K.2014/8841 ile aynı Dairenin E.2014/33, K.2014/8131 kararlarını gerekçe göstererek başvurucu hakkında topuk kanı alınm

15👏2

26 Jun 2026, 06:22 UTC≈2,100 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @dogaldogum

Topuk kanı hiçbir şekilde zorunlu değildir!!! Buyrun emsal karar! Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararı https://kararlarbilgibankasi.anayasa.gov.tr/BB/2014/4255

14👏4

21 Jun 2026, 21:32 UTC≈2,410 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Y2p4S9VdEu8?si=KklFUHn8vvR5WS3S

4

21 Jun 2026, 16:05 UTC≈2,470 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Y2p4S9VdEu8 Prof. Dr. Christopher Exley, bilim dünyasında haklı olarak "Bay Alüminyum" (Mr. Aluminum) lakabıyla anılan, 36 yılı aşkın bilimsel kariyerini alüminyumun biyolojik sistemler ve insan sağlığı üzerindeki yıkıcı etkilerini araştırmaya adamış son derece cesur ve vizyoner bir bilim insanıdır. Keele Üniversitesi'nde Biyoinorganik Kimya Profesörü olarak görev yaptığı uzun yıllar boyunca, alümin

18🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @isuda20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 74,175 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“İsuda” (@isuda20), 16,692 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/isuda20.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.