Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for I read you, baby ❤️

Channel

I read you, baby ❤️

@ireadyoubaby

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,712subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882306082
TypeChannel
Username@ireadyoubaby
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ireadyoubaby

Growth

1,7111,7181,714.57 August 2026 — 1,718 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,718 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,711 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,712 subscribers1,7127 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,710–1,719 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:061,712+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:371,711-7
7 Aug 2026, 16:521,718no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:161,718first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.75%
avg views ÷ 1,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
150
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,948
Reactions total202
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

372 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13135.2%
❤‍🔥10227.4%
🔥7119.1%
🥰4913.2%
🤔123.23%
💘51.34%
🕊10.269%
🤗10.269%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 372reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC49 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как только вы перестанете воспринимать всё на свой счёт, то обретёте невероятную свободу. Дон Мигель Руис @ireadyoubaby 📚

❤‍🔥83🤗1

5 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC80 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Боже мой, леди, какая хватка. Будьте со мной поласковей. Я хрупок. "Кошкина пижама" Рэй Брэдбери @ireadyoubaby 📚

❤‍🔥61🕊1

4 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC88 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пустота не значит «ничего». Пустота – это способ существования. Ты должен достигнуть экзистенциальной пустоты, чтобы наполнить себя ею. ”Задача трёх тел” Лю Цысинь

❤‍🔥10🤔21

4 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC84 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @black_coffee_NO_milkPhoto

Игры, в которые играют люди Мы сидели на кухне, пили чай, он курил. Год назад он перевернул мой мир, тогда я почувствовала себя живой, любимой, хрупкой, нежной, маленькой девочкой в его сильных руках, но главное - живой. После единственной встречи мы разошлись, я думала, просто он встретил кого-то. Прошел год. Ты бросила меня. Повисла тишина. Я бы никогда не бросила, что это за упрек? Знаешь мы все играем в игры.

❤‍🔥82🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC197 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Люди забудут, что вы говорили. Люди забудут, что вы делали. Но люди никогда не забудут, что они чувствовали благодаря вам. Майя Энджелоу @ireadyoubaby 📚

16🔥2🥰1

28 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC171 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда я начал любить себя, я перестал красть свое собственное время и проектировать грандиозные проекты на будущее. Сегодня я делаю только то, что приносит мне радость и счастье, то, что я люблю делать и что приводит мое сердце в радостное настроение. Я делаю это своим собственным способом и в своем собственном ритме. Сегодня я называю это «Простота». Чарли Чаплин @ireadyoubaby 📚

11❤‍🔥2🥰2

28 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC146 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @black_coffee_NO_milkPhoto

ЭСТЕТИКА ЖЕНСТВЕННОСТИ В МУЖСКОМ ОЗНАЧАЮЩЕМ Я с детства люблю эстетику. Во всем. Сначала куклы, платья и бантики. Позднее — Бернини, фортепьяно, Lanson. Но самая главная эстетика — это слова. Они прошивают человеческое тело насквозь. От них нельзя скрыться и не услышать. Поэтому они, эти волшебные фонемы, просто обязаны быть в моем мире прекрасны. Зная эту странность за собой, я чаще ее избегала или прятала. Ведь н

7🔥2💘1

27 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC136 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Разве милосердие не должно проявляться с особенной силой именно там, где особенно глубоко падение? Виктор Гюго @ireadyoubaby 📚

🥰11🔥4💘1

27 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC141 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @black_coffee_NO_milkPhoto

ТЫ - МОЕ ОДИНОЧЕСТВО Мы оба были в отношениях с Одиночеством. Я его любила, он - боялся и ненавидел. Наверное такие пары не должны даже встречаться. Но это было единственным, что нас действительно связывало. Он уходил, я его обнимала, захлопывала дверь и погружалась в свои книги, свои сны и свои платья. А он сразу же писал, что соскучился. Любовь и страх не смогли жить вместе долго и наш роман завершился через год

🔥92❤‍🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC134 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Знать путь и пройти его — не одно и то же. Фильм "Матрица", Морфеус @ireadyoubaby 📚

❤‍🔥142

22 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC227 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И тут он случайно взглянул на свои пальцы и застыл, пораженный и завороженный открывшимся зрелищем. Удивительно, как это указательный и средний пальцы правой руки знают, как в точности надо держать сигарету? Откуда в них этот ум, эта сообразительность? Словно они курят с рождения. Мысль оказалась настолько забавной, что он вынужден был улыбнуться. "Дорожные работы" Стивен Кинг @ireadyoubaby 📚

17🤔4❤‍🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC195 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @black_coffee_NO_milkPhoto

Единственное, в чем человек может быть виновен, по крайней мере в психоаналитической парадигме, это в том, что он уступил своему желанию. Жак Лакан

❤‍🔥153💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ireadyoubaby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,406,559 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“I read you, baby ❤️” (@ireadyoubaby), 1,712 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ireadyoubaby.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.