Channel
@iok65h
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,537subscribers
+494 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003640900833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iok65h |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iok65h |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 1,537 | +16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:28 | 1,521 | -77 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 1,598 | +21 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 1,577 | +155 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 07:02 | 1,422 | +56 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:21 | 1,366 | +151 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 1,215 | +18 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 1,197 | -98 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 1,295 | +246 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 1,049 | +6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 1,043 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:47 | 1,043 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#联邦报告 <https://t.me/gzafua> 【出击留名】：J旋风 【出击时间】：2026.8.30 【老师艺名】：#小纯 【联系方式】：@fenh567 【开课位置】：#绿地璀璨 【上课费用】：600p 【颜值身材】：人照8成，瘦底大波 【身高体重】：158/ 88 【胸杯紧度】: B或者C 【老师类型】：#嫩妹 【服务种类】：课表上都有 【情绪态度】：正常，有求必应 【优点缺点】：必填 ①缺点：女上不会，浅🐍，69不熟练 ②优点：瘦底大波，样子8成，皮肤白嫩，粉红色乳晕和乳头 【体验细节】 第一次工作日因为工作期间约不上头课，于是周末看到老师发开课信息试探一下有没有头课，老师说刚起床可以约头课，还给我不少空余的时间，果断出发到禅城著名景点，按照老师指示上楼后发现老师还没到，只能呆着楼梯间等着，看到一个嫩妹的身影出电梯后果断尾随老师快速进去课室，近距离细看老师还是素颜的状态而且还能对上频道的8成，果断交水费，由于…
https://t.me/Gzffol/45425
Sticker, posted without a caption
头课可约 宝贝们
❤1
开课啦 头课可约宝宝们🈶🈳
【少御报告】https://t.me/FSsvyjhj 【老师艺名】小纯 【联系方式】@fenh567 【所在位置】禅城 【验证留名】猫猫 【验证时间】2026.9.7 【修车费用】半价p 【颜值身材】大屁股嫩妹 【服务内容】口，做 【服务态度】平平淡淡，嫩妹没啥服务 【优点缺点】皮肤嫩，有肉不胖 【推荐程度】7-8 【体验细节】素颜开课，看上去是个年龄不大的小妹妹，胸饱满粉嫩，舔了几分钟，传教做的我腹肌疼，没女上，男生全程主动做的特别累人。做完后抽烟就有点头晕想睡觉了。大屁股，又大又圆，后入感觉特别有感觉，态度好没有不耐烦，做起来的过程中宝宝好像女朋友一样害羞不敢看。有种初恋般的感觉 ♥️温馨提示: 以上仅代表个人体验，报告仅供参考！ 报告提交： @QST_mrlbot
昨天有事耽误了 开课啦 头课可约宝宝们🈶🈳
开课啦 可约宝宝们🈶🈳
回忆一下 小时侯
Sticker, posted without a caption
开课啦 头课可约宝宝们🈶🈳
纯纯朋友圈 pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iok65h. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“纯纯朋友圈” (@iok65h), 1,537 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iok65h.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.