Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

РАШНС ДОНТ БЛАШ. лав ин зе коттэдж

@inthecottage

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,080subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003551810774
TypeChannel
Username@inthecottage
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/inthecottage

Growth

2,0482,0802,0647 August 2026 — 2,048 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,048 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,049 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,050 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,080 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,043–2,085 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:482,080+30
11 Aug 2026, 03:162,050+1
8 Aug 2026, 13:122,049+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:322,048no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:132,048first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.2%
avg views ÷ 2,080 subscribers
Avg views / post
482
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (7 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,748
Reactions total855
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

855 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 528093103942064574421925.6%
custom 536880567086485710514617.1%
custom 535083114683175101611513.5%
custom 52224345941664452018910.4%
custom 53505479195083793768810.3%
custom 5350728033256908387738.54%
custom 5350463579235588965586.78%
custom 5375281506589648449546.32%
custom 5368400861607272824131.52%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 855reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC236 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @heatedrivalryartPhoto

мне нужно успеть уснуть до того, как в мое сознание придет осознание того, что я абсолютно ничего не добилась в жизни и даже не нашла себя.

custom 535083114683175101618custom 53684008616072728243

7 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC226 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @heatedrivalryartPhoto

😳 : чтоб такого пиздануть, чтобы мне в ебало прописали

custom 535072803325690838720

7 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC451 views86 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

иногда мне кажется, что у них есть отдельный кастинг на лучшие сиси потому что ВОТ ОНИ ОЧЕРЕДНЫЕ ОХУЕННО БОЛЬШИЕ ГОРЯЧИЕ БУБСЫ

custom 535054791950837937653custom 535083114683175101622custom 535072803325690838711

7 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC240 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

~;; ⭐️ TWITTER // Добро пожаловать в СНТ Розановку, Трой и Харрис😭 #️⃣ heated rivalry every day

custom 528093103942064574443custom 52224345941664452017custom 53505479195083793764

7 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC212 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

~;; 🎁 TWITTER Эти бэстис появятся на наших экранах и уже СОВСЕМ СКОРО #️⃣ heated rivalry every day

custom 535072803325690838738custom 528093103942064574416custom 53504635792355889656custom 53505479195083793762

7 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈1,080 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ну вы посмотрите на этого улыбчивого харизматичного парня, он очень вайбит харрисом даже если внешне отличается от книжного. такое солнышко 👉

custom 528093103942064574479custom 522243459416644520118custom 537528150658964844916

7 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC489 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @pupurpruPhoto

Hellooo??? 👅👅👅👅👅

custom 536880567086485710554custom 53505479195083793769custom 53508311468317510168custom 53504635792355889652

7 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC500 views94 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @heatedrivalryartPhoto

ебать хадсон уильямс и коннор сторри сыграют во втором сезоне heated rivalry 😳😳😳

custom 536880567086485710570custom 537528150658964844915custom 52809310394206457449

7 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC664 views102 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

КАКОЙ ЖЕ ОН ОХУЕННЫЙ Я В ЛЮТОМ ВОСТОРГЕ ВОТ ОН НАШ ТРОЙ 😋 украла фото у ви

custom 535083114683175101667custom 535054791950837937620custom 528093103942064574415

7 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC578 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026

самое время напомнить, что мы тут не сремся и не обсуждаем в негативном ключе актеров и персонажей, а тихо мирно орем от восторга ❤

custom 522243459416644520140custom 536840086160727282410custom 537528150658964844910

7 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC583 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

добро пожаловать, трой и харрис!

custom 53507280332569083874custom 52224345941664452011

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @inthecottage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 88,997 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РАШНС ДОНТ БЛАШ. лав ин зе коттэдж” (@inthecottage), 2,080 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inthecottage.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.