Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for info arch

Channel

info arch

@innsjo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001805092304
TypeChannel
Username@innsjo
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/innsjo

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 30 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
17
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
150.0%
🥰150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2024 to 30 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2024, 23:21 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 1 month. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

16 Feb 2024, 16:59 UTC12 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @plauxi

Я В КРАШ ЛИСТЕ У КОМФОРТИКА ?!! огромное спасибо , мне очень приятно !

4 Feb 2024, 18:35 UTC23 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @XIQIIMPhoto

К Р А Ш — Л И С Т ОТ @XIQIIM мью, я вас всех очень люблю, но эти каналы занимают отдельное местечко в моем сердце . я восхищаюсь их работами . владельцы вообще — чудесные мои my little stars 𓇼 ещё есть некоторые люди , владельцы каналов которые для меня очень любезны . вы такие мямьмь お気に入り : @kisedn , @MO0L1Y , @mrtoshq , @lan4f , @decxil , @L4UNAA . спасибо этим мьюшкам , я немогу не говорить к

4 Feb 2024, 18:35 UTC15 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🌟 •• —> #CRAS6H •.🍓¿ 0 • ☆ 🎀 ( ✨ #SHEET🌟 ¡! 💦 🎸 @mydayslover/ @lee_siyeonxx / @reomiYa / @starryskymee 🥠 @lalisaton3 / @helpblink @LINARCHJI / 🐑@rinquaka / @looksopretty01 ✨ @kpopmyislife @misgorodp / @chatick222 @doulgrp /💄 @saraliff / @plauxi /@kpopshoppinat /@zalab1mstck @cutsbymovle/ @YSN0k 🫀 если видите себя здесь то рп к себе

2 Feb 2024, 20:09 UTC16 viewsread 29 August 2026

crush list от @archhbae my lovers @shikyoko @AGRORE1 my favorite channels @lov1tzy @archlilii @F09GK @sswet1e @ryuj1n02 @gisellehkb @mickeyarch @saberrylia @ye1nx @arhhkyuujin @minharch @soheearch @arch_redvel @ITZYARCHIVEE1 @K1RAES @sweetieryeji @plauxi @kmwnwin @wintikarc @easychae порядок не принципиален

31 Jan 2024, 15:46 UTC24 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

👻.👻👻.CRASH LIST - ¡ chaewon arch !. . @dinaslyyy @kellyvvvv1 @ssallg @MNL0VR @help_richelle @EGOISTH_6 @wintikarc @yongkats @kitasexna @Yuefsiarhv @haerinarch @Sexyboysworld @AIlARCH @chriskissme @drssevi @arch_redvel @dayryuji1 @GWQLLAYRS @J45lo @berryblui @kikkorikki @kariii_nnn @lixarchive @summerkisses @ki_ss8 @ryujiar @wintarh @baehearte @yok1ww @ewiinxxz @ettkr1 @AM1NMM @d06fl @omgsahyocannel @lssa

30 Jan 2024, 18:46 UTC28 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @ryuarch1Photo

краш лист от хена . . ) порядок не имеет значения!! (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) все комфортики неверояйшие может ещё будет пополняться всех чмок, каналы чараш

30 Jan 2024, 15:52 UTC47 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

@haerinarch & @archive_chaewoni ваши судьбы сложились случайным образом. об этом случае вы бы не хотели рассказывать , потому что тогда случилось что то такоее 🤫 вы оба со стороны кажетесь милыми и скромными , но на деле очень сильны и любите достигать целей во что бы то не стало ну тут даже спорить не надо , милашки

1🥰1

30 Jan 2024, 15:52 UTC32 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

@ARWLIT & @YV1SE оба комфортных человека с большим грузом на душе. они пытаются помочь всем и друг другу , не смотря на то , что сами тонут в проблемах. я не знаю , просто , оба канала комфортны для меня

30 Jan 2024, 15:51 UTC55 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

@wintikarc & @wintarh БРО , ВЫ СЕРЬЕЗНО , У ВАС ЮЗЫ ПОЧТИ ОДИКОВЫЕ 😨 ВЫ ОБА КАНОНИЩЕ

30 Jan 2024, 15:50 UTC37 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

@LW1SG7 & @karyunjin вы оба очень сильные и стойкие люди , которые всякий раз заканчиваете ссору одними и теми мыслями. можно сказать вы созданы друг для друга здесь я уже не знаю , вы просто очень похожи , в плане вайба. оба канала очень насыщенны долгой и трудной работой

30 Jan 2024, 15:50 UTC669 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

@ppetalZ & @archivelesse вы - та самая пара , которая пытается понять друг друга , но в каждой такой попытке терпите неудачу , тк вы совершенно разные люди а все потому что , у одного канала чб коллор , а у другого цв.

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @innsjo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“info arch” (@innsjo). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/innsjo.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.