Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐‘ฐ๐’๐’‡๐’ ๐’Œ๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’๐’‚ ๐‘ฒ๐’†๐’”๐’†๐’Ž๐’Œ๐’Œ๐’Ž๐’”

Channel

๐‘ฐ๐’๐’‡๐’ ๐’Œ๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’๐’‚ ๐‘ฒ๐’†๐’”๐’†๐’Ž๐’Œ๐’Œ๐’Ž๐’”

@infokanalkecemkks

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

โ€”subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002173358723
TypeChannel
Username@infokanalkecemkks
Description๐‘ฐ๐’๐’‡๐’ ๐’Œ๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’๐’‚ ๐‘ฒ๐’†๐’”๐’†๐’Ž๐’Œ๐’Œ๐’Ž๐’”
Created18 July 2024 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/infokanalkecemkks

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart โ€” so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 18 July 2024 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2025, 11:40 UTC12 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ะœั‹ ะฟั€ะธะณะปะฐัˆะฐะตะผ ะฒะฐั ะฟั€ะธัะพะตะดะตะฝะธั‚ัŒัั ะฒ ะฟั€ะตะบั€ะฐัะฝั‹ะน ั„ะฐะฝะดะพะผ ะฟะพ ะฒัะตะผ ั‚ัƒั€ะตั†ะบะธะผ ัะตั€ะธะฐะปะฐะผ!๐Ÿคฉ ะขัƒั‚ ะตัั‚ัŒ ะฒัะต! ๐Ÿ–คะ ะตะผะธะฝะธ ๐Ÿ–คะะฒั‹ ๐Ÿ–คะะฐั€ะตะทะบะธ ๐Ÿ–คะกั‚ะธะบะตั€ั‹ ๐Ÿ–คะœะพะผะตะฝั‚ั‹ ๐Ÿ–คะšะพะฝะบัƒั€ัั‹ ๐Ÿ–คะ˜ะณั€ั‹ ะ˜ ัั‚ะพ ะฒัะต ะฒ ะพะดะฝะพะผ ะบะฐะฝะฐะปะต!๐ŸŽ€ ๐Ÿ–ค ะ—ะฐั…ะพะดะธ ัะบะพั€ะตะต! ๐Ÿ–ค

4 Aug 2025, 22:27 UTC14 viewsread 29 August 2026

โ™กะ˜ะฝั„ะพ ะบะฐะฝะฐะปะฐ โ†ณKesemkks ๐ŸŽ€ะ’ะปะฐะดะตะปะตั†โ‡Š @Sirtanch ๐Ÿ–คะ’ะฟ ๐ŸŒธ5+ ะฟะพะดะฟะธัั‡ะธะบะพะฒ ,ะฒั‹ ะฟั€ะธัั‹ะปะฐะตั‚ะต ัˆะฑ ะธ ัะบั€ะธะฝ ะฝะฐ ะฟะพะดะฟะธัะบัƒ ะบะฐะฝะฐะปะฐ! ๐ŸŒธะ•ัะปะธ ัƒ ะฒะฐั ะฑะพะปัŒัˆะต 10 ะฟะพะดะฟะธัั‡ะธะบะพะฒ ัะบั€ะธะฝ ะฝะฐ ะฟะพะดะฟะธัะบัƒ ะฝะต ะฝัƒะถะตะฝ! ๐ŸŒธะจะฑ ะดะตั€ะถะธั‚ัั ะฝะฐ ะบะฐะฝะฐะปะต 30-60 ะผะธะฝัƒั‚ ะดะฐะฑั‹ ะฝะต ะทะฐัะพั€ัั‚ัŒ ะบะฐะฝะฐะป. ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ ๐Ÿ–คะžะฟ ๐Ÿ’—ะ”ะตะปะฐัŽ ะฝะฐ 8-40 ะฟะผ ๐Ÿ’—ะกั€ะฐะทัƒ ะบะธะดะฐะตั‚ะต ัะบั€ะธะฝ ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ,ะฟะพะดะฟะธัะบะธ ะฝะฐ ะฝะฐัˆ ะšะฐะฝะฐะป ะธ ะฒะฐัˆ ะฟะพัั‚! ๐Ÿ’—ะŸะพะดะฟะธัะบะฐ ะฝะฐ ะบะฐะฝะฐะป ะพะฑัะทะฐั‚ะตะปัŒะฝะฐ! โ€ฆ

29 Aug 2024, 19:44 UTC158 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

ะžั†ะตะฝะธั‚ะต ะฝะฐัˆ ะบะฐะฝะฐะป

  1. ๐Ÿ’—35%
  2. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—3%
  3. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—3%
  4. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—0%
  5. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—6%
  6. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—52%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @infokanalkecemkks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Aug 2024, 19:44 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

ะžั†ะตะฝะธั‚ะต ะฝะฐัˆ ะบะฐะฝะฐะป

  1. ๐Ÿ’—35%
  2. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—3%
  3. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—3%
  4. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—0%
  5. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—6%
  6. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’—52%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2024 to 5 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

โ€œ๐‘ฐ๐’๐’‡๐’ ๐’Œ๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’๐’‚ ๐‘ฒ๐’†๐’”๐’†๐’Ž๐’Œ๐’Œ๐’Ž๐’”โ€ (@infokanalkecemkks). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infokanalkecemkks.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download โ€” a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.