Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐 𝒇𝒖𝒄𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒏 💋

Channel

𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐 𝒇𝒖𝒄𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒏 💋

@infofuckingchann

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001992499638
TypeChannel
Username@infofuckingchann
Created14 January 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/infofuckingchann

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋631.6%
💘526.3%
421.1%
❤‍🔥15.26%
🍓15.26%
🍾15.26%
🥰15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2024 to 28 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jan 2024, 17:12 UTC20 views5 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Шикарный канал, обожаю вас 💋 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

1🍓1🍾1💋1💘1

19 Jan 2024, 09:43 UTC21 viewsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! у вас лучший канал!! очень быстро и качественно выполняете запросы,огромное вам спасибо за это. ЛЮБЛЮ ВАС 🫶 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

15 Jan 2024, 10:33 UTC29 views4 reactionsread 26 August 2026

я тоже себе люблю 💋 ще раз мене так назвеш вб'ю)

💋21💘1

15 Jan 2024, 10:33 UTC25 viewsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Ізабелька я те люблю ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

15 Jan 2024, 07:41 UTC28 viewsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! канал😍😍😍😍 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

14 Jan 2024, 21:55 UTC228 viewsread 26 August 2026

Наша анонимка.💋 http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=N74gR4rHz8ROpEv

14 Jan 2024, 19:14 UTC25 views4 reactionsread 26 August 2026

♪ вп делаем от 50 подпищиков. ♪ вз не делаем. ♪ оп делаем со всеми. после оп обязательно кидать скрин добива. оп делаем на один пост только один раз. несколько раз один и тот же пост не берём. Писать: @xmikalson

1💋1💘1🥰1

14 Jan 2024, 18:59 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 26 August 2026

♪ Материал канала ♪ Мы работаем по всем фд. У нас на канале можно найти нарезки, замедленки, стикеры в любом виде, гифы, моменты фотошопы и тд. Материал можно брать без отметки, но на каналы не брать без разрешения. ♪ Просьба ♪ Если берете материал из нашего канала обязательно отмечайте сам канал. мы тоже должны получать отдачу, мы всегда отмечаем каналы из которых берем материалы, поэтому просим вас делать то же

1💋1💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @infofuckingchann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐 𝒇𝒖𝒄𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒏 💋” (@infofuckingchann). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infofuckingchann.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.