Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АДМИНЫ | INARMY

Channel

АДМИНЫ | INARMY

@inarmyadmins

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,519subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001876965361
TypeChannel
Username@inarmyadmins
Created10 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/inarmyadmins

Growth

4,5194,5704,544.56 August 2026 — 4,570 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,570 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,568 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,560 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,552 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,547 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,534 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,526 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,519 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,511–4,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 12:454,519-7
22 Aug 2026, 22:554,526-8
19 Aug 2026, 10:354,534-13
16 Aug 2026, 18:594,547-5
13 Aug 2026, 07:154,552-8
10 Aug 2026, 08:114,560-8
7 Aug 2026, 04:464,568-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:354,570no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:064,570first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 28s
Average length
8m 28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

727 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30642.1%
❤‍🔥11215.4%
🥰729.90%
👍658.94%
💋395.36%
🔥364.95%
😍304.13%
🐳253.44%
172.34%
😁172.34%
🕊40.55%
🤨20.275%
😭10.138%
😴10.138%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 727reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 20 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Feb 2026, 20:14 UTC≈3,270 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ТОЧНО, МОЖНО ЖЕ СЮДА ПИСАТЬ… А Я ДУМАЮ ГДЕ С ВАМИ ОБЩАТЬСЯ 🤓🙇🏻👀

32🐳4❤‍🔥1

Signed Elveszett

20 Feb 2026, 16:59 UTC≈3,310 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Посоветуйте, пожалуйста, румяна

10❤‍🔥3💋2

Signed belozeriha_kriss

6 Nov 2025, 20:21 UTC≈5,970 views87 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Тут есть кто ?👀

👍51💋18🔥8🕊43🤨2🐳1

Signed belozeriha_kriss

14 Oct 2025, 18:41 UTC≈7,050 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

После такого обычно эфир начинается

😁175😭1

Signed belozeriha_kriss

14 Oct 2025, 18:36 UTC≈6,660 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Тук тук 👀

🥰20😴1

Signed Indiranews

21 Sept 2025, 23:30 UTC≈7,010 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

СРОЧНО! Кто-то умеет оживлять фото с помощью ИИ?😭🙏

13

Signed belozeriha_kriss

30 Aug 2025, 06:13 UTC≈7,150 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Крч, рассказываю , пишу два фанфика Один фф — прям моя любовь, очень люблю его 🥲 Второй — ну тоже любимый, но…я им так не прониклась 😭😭😭 И я ожидала , что первый прям залетит, а второй — нет , ПО ИТОГУ ВСЕ НАОБОРОТ ЧТО ЗА НЕСПРАВЕДЛИВОСТЬ

🥰3320

Signed belozeriha_kris_lolli

10 May 2025, 13:31 UTC≈8,110 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Показывают вам сайт. Сразу скажу, не адаптировала его под телефон. Смотрите с ноута или с компа 😁 https://k-popproekt.tilda.ws/

23🥰3❤‍🔥2

Signed belozeriha_kris_lolli

7 May 2025, 12:51 UTC≈7,110 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всем привет! По учебе я делала одно задание — свой сайт. Посвятила я его к-поп интересно вам посмотреть ?

408

Signed belozeriha_kris_lolli

24 Apr 2025, 13:28 UTC≈7,340 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всем, добрый вечер, подскажите есть ли среди нас те, кто занимется созданием лонгридов?😅

🐳155🥰2

Signed belozeriha_kris_lolli

19 Apr 2025, 18:20 UTC≈6,480 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

35🥰7🔥2

Signed belozeriha_kris_lolli

19 Apr 2025, 11:01 UTC≈5,380 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кто-то красил яйца в вине ? Какой результат у вас был ?🫣

🔥241

Signed belozeriha_kris_lolli

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inarmyadmins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 210,579 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АДМИНЫ | INARMY” (@inarmyadmins), 4,519 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inarmyadmins.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.