https://boristane.com/blog/the-software-development-lifecycle-is-dead/
👍7🤣4❤2🥰1

Channel
@ihor_codes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
1,037subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001522854275 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ihor_codes |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ihor_codes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 1,037 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 1,038 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 1,036 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 1,035 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 1,035 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
327 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 83 | 25.4% | |
| 😁 | 78 | 23.9% | |
| ❤ | 70 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 43 | 13.1% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 3.98% | |
| 😐 | 11 | 3.36% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 1.83% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 1.53% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 1.53% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.22% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 0.917% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.612% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.612% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.306% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.306% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2023 to 25 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://boristane.com/blog/the-software-development-lifecycle-is-dead/
👍7🤣4❤2🥰1
My Cursor workflow: 1. I first use my brain to understand what I need and how I would solve it. 2. I read the codebase and find the places where I need to make changes - this also gives me an understanding of the effort: whether the llm can one-shot it or if I need to split it into smaller steps. 3. I tag related files (the most important ones, not all) and describe the feature I want - I type this myself. I tried s…
🔥16❤5👍5👀1
Im happily surprised by the results, I thought that much fewer people use AI. For me, it’s 100%. I forgot when was the last time I wrote something on my own. Last year, Cursor did this: - wrote infra scripts for setting up switches / routers / machines in an on-premise data center (which is crazy if you ask me. I thought this one was not going to work, but after a few hundred bucks in credits, it solved it. single …
❤14👍7🔥4🤯2🥰1😁1
Remember this? "Anthropic's CEO says that in 3 to 6 months, AI will be writing 90% of the code" https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-ceo-ai-90-percent-code-3-to-6-months-2025-3 What percentage of code do you create with AI tools?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥4❤1
fun https://cursor.com/2025
🔥6👍5
Made some wallpapers that motivate me. 🔥 If you like it, 😁 if you think it's cringe.
😁53🔥14❤4🐳3👏1🥰1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiPYgiu8-Hc Makes sense. I have 0 motivation to hire juniors. This old structure of "1 senior + few mid guys + few juniors" got replaced with "1 senior + few AI tools".
😐11👎10🔥3😱2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xTGNNLPyMI
❤14🔥5👍2
Exposure to information isn't learning! Learning is a change in actions. If you read/listen/watch anything, and your behavior doesn't change - you learned nothing. If you don't change your behavior over years, and you are in the same place in your life, it means you are not learning. It means, you are a dummy.
❤19👍6😢5🤔2👎1🔥1🥰1😁1
https://situational-awareness.ai/
🔥4❤2👍1👎1🤔1
my netflix these days: https://www.deeplearning.ai/short-courses/preprocessing-unstructured-data-for-llm-applications/ https://www.deeplearning.ai/short-courses/advanced-retrieval-for-ai/ https://www.deeplearning.ai/short-courses/knowledge-graphs-rag/ https://www.deeplearning.ai/short-courses/building-multimodal-search-and-rag/ https://www.deeplearning.ai/short-courses/building-agentic-rag-with-llamaindex/ http…
🔥17❤8👍6🤔1😁1
на русском значительно хуже войс но движение рук это нечто 💪
😁21🔥7❤1👍1👎1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ihor_codes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Remember this? "Anthropic's CEO says that in 3 to 6 months, AI will be writing 90% of the code" https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-ceo-ai-90-percent-code-3-to-6-months-2025-3 What percentage of code do you create with AI tools?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2023 to 25 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ihor Codes” (@ihor_codes), 1,037 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ihor_codes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.