Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for vliona

Channel

vliona

@idamnckalie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,374subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001171078236
TypeChannel
Username@idamnckalie
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/idamnckalie

Growth

2,3742,4012,387.57 August 2026 — 2,401 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,401 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,392 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,383 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,374 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,370–2,405 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:252,374-9
13 Aug 2026, 04:542,383-9
9 Aug 2026, 23:432,392-9
7 Aug 2026, 01:302,401no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:202,401first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

20 Feb 2023, 03:47 UTC≈10,400 viewsread 7 August 2026

Kalau bisa mengulang kembali cerita masalalu, aku memilih untuk tidak pernah mengenalmu

17 Jan 2023, 15:05 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 7 August 2026

cerita nya mungkin sudah usai, tapi kenangannya terlalu sulit diabaikan

20 Dec 2022, 16:45 UTC≈12,500 viewsread 7 August 2026

Aku baik-baik saja jika kamu lihat bagian luarnya. Tapi aku sebenarnya tengah terpuruk

6 Dec 2022, 15:29 UTC≈13,100 viewsread 7 August 2026

Jika kamu bisa pergi tanpa berat melepaskan. Jelas aku juga bisa menjadi diriku tanpa dirimu. Kenapa aku harus takut kehilangan mu?

6 Dec 2022, 15:27 UTC≈13,500 viewsread 7 August 2026

Aku? baik-baik saja? Mungkin iya. Atau memang aku baik-baik saja. Aku tidak terluka , sedikitpun tidak merasakan sakit hati. Aku sudah lupa , aku sudah tidak ingat tentang kita lagi. Aku adalah aku yang sekarang , menjadi diriku yang sudah bisa tanpamu

6 Dec 2022, 15:24 UTC≈11,000 viewsread 7 August 2026

Lucu jika kamu bertanya aku baik-baik saja setelah aku melepasmu pergi karena keinginanmu yang terus memaksa pergi

30 Nov 2022, 16:39 UTC≈10,500 viewsread 7 August 2026

Jangan jadikan kekurangan dari seseorang itu sebagai bahan candaan. Bagimu lucu , tapi tidak dengan si pemilik kekurangan. Harga dirinya dijatuhkan , seakan hidupnya adalah sebuah lawakan

28 Nov 2022, 10:01 UTC≈9,410 viewsread 7 August 2026

Cukup percaya, dan jangan mencari tau jika akhirnya membuat sakit sendiri

28 Nov 2022, 10:01 UTC≈9,140 viewsread 7 August 2026

Move on itu bukan perihal melupakan, tetapi bagaimana kita mengikhlaskan seseorang

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @idamnckalie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 492,921 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vliona” (@idamnckalie), 2,374 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/idamnckalie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.