Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for iSANS Беларусь

Channel

iSANS Беларусь

@iSANS_Belarus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

1,545subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001446967004
TypeChannel
Username@iSANS_Belarus
Created1 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iSANS_Belarus

Growth

1,5441,5451,544.56 August 2026 — 1,545 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,545 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,544 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,545 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,544–1,545 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:421,545+1
9 Aug 2026, 20:511,544-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:341,545no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:311,545first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 1,545 subscribers
Avg views / post
455
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,365
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7645.5%
😢4024.0%
3521.0%
💩127.19%
👎42.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC253 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А надо ли строить 3-й блок БелАЭС, если электропотребление падает? Энергетический дайджест за июль: ▪️На фоне топливного кризиса в России появляются слухи про ограничение продажи бензина и дизеля в приграничных районах Беларуси — «Белоруснефть» говорит, что дефицита на АЗС нет. ▪️Россия увеличила импорт бензина из Беларуси до исторического максимума: в июне ввезла 141 тыс. т топлива, что в 2,4 раза превышает объём

👍4💩1

5 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC374 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«НАТО готовится к первому удару по России». Что говорят о Польше и странах Балтии беларусским военным и силовикам: ▪️Обострение отношений Польши и Украины — одна из главных тем июля. Украинцы внесли в базу «Миротворец» главу канцелярии польского президента, в Беларуси написали, что «Польша взращивает чудовище». А еще много говорили, что дружба стран в принципе невозможна, так как у Польши есть территориальные амбици

👍1

27 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTC738 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Будет ядерный удар. И не будет ни Варшавы, ни Вильнюса, ни Киева, ни Берлина». Изменения в прокремлевской пропаганде Беларуси весной и летом 2026: ▪️Главное, что поменялось в риторике официального Минска за последние 3 месяца, — отношение к Украине. И это напрямую связано с продвижением украинцев на фронте. Еще в апреле сторонники Лукашенко повторяли за Кремлем угрозы в адрес Киева, но уже к июню активно заговорили

5👍3😢1

16 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC817 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ВСУ теперь атакуют НПЗ украинскими ракетами, а Россия уже переживает топливный кризис. Атаки на российскую энергетику в июне, главное: ▪️За июнь зафиксировано 14 успешных атак на НПЗ. Что интересно, некоторые заводы не попадали под удар на протяжении нескольких месяцев, а другие (например, «ЛУКОЙЛ-Нижегороднефтеоргсинтез», Московский НПЗ) были атакованы и в мае, и в июне. Возможно, атаки планируются с учетом восстан

👍102

15 Jul 2026, 08:08 UTC765 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Беларусь теряет детей, а результаты ЦТ опять вызывают вопросы: июньский мониторинг системы образования от iSANS ▪️Результаты ЦЭ и ЦТ опять вызывают вопросы. В прошлом году количество стобалльников выглядело аномальным, и многие эксперты пришли к выводу, что задания на госэкзамене упростили — отсюда и красивая статистика. В этом году картина более неоднозначная: по русскому, например, рекордное количество стобалльник

😢6👍21💩1

10 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC695 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Лукашенко спасает Европу от большой войны». Как изменилась официальная риторика Минска в июне: ▪️Украина обогнала Трампа, Запад и даже Польшу по количеству упоминаний в провластной прессе (5651 раз за месяц!). И это не случайно: риторика Минска заметно меняется на фоне медленного, но очевидного перелома в пользу Украины на фронте. Растёт понимание, что у России всё меньше шансов победить, значит и акценты надо расс

👍72💩1

9 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC645 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Захолустье без суверенитета с убитой экономикой». Что говорят о Польше и странах Балтии беларусским военным и силовикам: Польшу не только обвиняют в подготовке войны, но и грозят тем, что война сама придет к полякам — со стороны Киева. Логика такая: если Польша «продолжит дистанцироваться от Беларуси и России», то ее «сожрут, раздавят». ▪️Тема «польской милитаризации» развивается не менее стремительно. Пишут, что

💩6👍3

7 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC676 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нехватка газа в Беларуси в отопительный сезон. Энергетический дайджест за июнь Министр энергетики Мороз заявил: «Мы последовательно реализуем следующий этап трансформации отрасли — модернизацию электросетевой инфраструктуры». Пока весь мир занимается энергетической трансформацией с переходом на безуглеродные источники энергии, у нас трансформацией называют обычную модернизацию сетей. А теперь к новостям: ▪️По класс

😢4👍2💩1

7 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC564 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Беларусь паставіла ў Расію рэкордныя 141 тыс. тон бензіну за першыя 25 дзён чэрвеня. На фоне навін пра тое, як расіяне змагаюцца за кожны літр на запраўках, узнікае лагічнае пытанне: ці магла наша краіна аператыўна нарасціць вытворчасць, каб дапамагчы вырашыць бензінавы крызіс у Расіі? Эканамічна прадаваць бензін менавіта ў Расію выгадней. Кошт беларускага бензіну ў РФ — каля $1620 за тону, тады як на найбуйнейшых с

5👍2

29 Jun 2026, 11:20 UTC781 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ключевые изменения в образовании Беларуси за последний учебный год Образование взяли под контроль: частников вытесняют из сферы, вузы перепрофилируют, чтобы решить проблемы с кадровым голодом, а школы накрывает милитаризация. iSANS собрал самое важное в одном документе: ▪️ Фактически в стране развивается запрет на профессию педагога. В 2025 ввели ограничение на работу с детьми для осуждённых по «экстремистским» ста

😢72💩1

26 Jun 2026, 13:27 UTC≈2,360 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Официальный Минск пытается информационно дистанцироваться от войны Аналитик iSANS исследовал «красные линии беларусской пропаганды» — о чем могут и не могут писать провластные паблики, когда нужно придерживаться и политики Лукашенко, и ретранслировать прокремлевские установки. И хотя случилась очевидная синхронизация двух пропаганд, в риторике Минска и Москвы есть ключевые отличия. ▪️Если Россия ведёт «войну на уни

10👍4

25 Jun 2026, 14:54 UTC729 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Польским военным и водяной пистолет не доверишь, а литовцы сами виноваты в контрабанде». Команда мониторинга iSANS выделила в отдельную тему нарративы пропаганды, адресованные беларусским военным и силовикам. Мы начинаем публиковать месячные обзоры на сайте в разделе «пропаганда — мониторинг». Что было замечено в мае: ▪️Польша остается врагом №1. Если кратко, логика такая: Польша хочет войны с Беларусью и Россией,

👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iSANS_Belarus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 203,623 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q135092135 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
Label𝗶𝗦𝗔𝗡𝗦
X / Twitter@iSANS_CEE

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“iSANS Беларусь” (@iSANS_Belarus), 1,545 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iSANS_Belarus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.