👩🦱👩🏫🫂🐵🐒🐉🦧🦇🌻 套图【亚洲女】:https://t.me/taotu_kt0 套图【亚洲男】:https://t.me/taotu_kt2 套图【欧洲女】:https://t.me/taotu_kt3 套图【欧洲男】:https://t.me/taotu_kt4 绘画 【工作室】:https://t.me/sucai8880 套图【小红书‒亚洲女】:https://t.me/xhs_H1 套图【小红书‒亚洲男】:https://t.me/xhs_H2 精品【女私密照】:https://t.me/simi_H8 代写【人设定制】:https://t.me/daixie_8 话术【话术素材】:https://t.me/huashu_cai 素材【美食素材】:https://t.me/meishi_VV 美工【P图 设计】:https://t.me/mgmghuu 会员【飞机会员】:https://t.me/hyyyh8…

Channel
话术【材】
@huashu_cai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,930subscribers
-839 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001805135882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @huashu_cai |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/huashu_cai |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 9,930 | -80 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 10,010 | -28 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 10,038 | -28 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 10,066 | -50 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 10,116 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 10,118 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 10,119 | -41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 10,160 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 10,167 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 10,172 | no change |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 10,172 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 10,173 | -13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 10,186 | -50 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 10,236 | -38 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 10,274 | -54 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 10,328 | -81 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 10,409 | -62 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 10,471 | -65 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 10,536 | -39 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 10,575 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.878%
- avg views ÷ 9,930 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 87.2
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 436 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
#日本空降 #日本 #空降
#阿根廷 #阿根廷快杀 #阿根廷刷单
#阿根廷 #阿根廷快杀 #阿根廷刷单
#色敲 #国内色敲 #色敲案例 #色敲人设
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @huashu_cai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@meishi_VV · 32,78525 posts苹果ID🔥tiktok🔥推特🔥脸书
@jingpintaot · 21,54112 posts小龙-套图-人设【亚洲男】
@taotu_kt2 · 17,4307 posts小龙-套图-人设【亚洲女】
@taotu_kt0 · 17,5936 posts套图-人设-美女【小红书 】
@xhs_H1 · 17,4026 posts海外素材 【美食素材】
@sucai_u1555 · 14,1965 posts人设-《代写》
@daixie_8 · 16,4614 posts套图-人设-男子【小红书 】
@xhs_H2 · 17,4574 posts精品套图【私密照】
@simi_H8 · 2,7513 posts全球代购 全球配送 同城配送 鲜花 奢侈品
@daigou_zc · 14,2132 posts飞机会员代开/会员代开/TG会员
@hyyyh8 · 601 post精品套图-女私密
@simi_bi · 20,0291 post绘画·素描·肖像·绘画·绘画·素描
@sucai8880 · 22,2421 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@daigou_zc · 14,2131 post人设-《代写》
@daixie_8 · 16,4611 post2345看图王-作图软件-转账模拟器
@GGP2345 · 9,8671 post飞机会员代开/会员代开/TG会员
@hyyyh8 · 601 post苹果ID🔥tiktok🔥推特🔥脸书
@jingpintaot · 21,5411 post美食素材馆
@meishi_VV · 32,7851 post美工 PS证件 海报设计 实物证件
@mgmghuu · 2,8891 post精品套图【私密照】
@simi_H8 · 2,7511 post绘画·素描·肖像·绘画·绘画·素描
@sucai8880 · 22,2421 post小龙-套图-人设【亚洲女】
@taotu_kt0 · 17,5931 post小龙-套图-人设【亚洲男】
@taotu_kt2 · 17,4301 post小龙-套图-人设【欧洲女】
@taotu_kt3 · 17,4151 post小龙-套图-人设【欧洲男】
@taotu_kt4 · 17,3921 post套图-人设-美女【小红书 】
@xhs_H1 · 17,4021 post套图-人设-男子【小红书 】
@xhs_H2 · 17,4571 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“话术【材】” (@huashu_cai), 9,930 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huashu_cai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.