Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Доктайп

@html_blog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,258subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001771322833
TypeChannel
Username@html_blog
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/html_blog

Growth

3,2583,2613,259.57 August 2026 — 3,261 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,261 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,258 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,258–3,261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:533,258-3
7 Aug 2026, 17:303,261no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:463,261first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

386 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁26769.2%
🔥5815.0%
😢307.77%
164.15%
153.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 386reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 1 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Mar 2026, 07:39 UTC≈1,150 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

уф, это было сложно

😁20🔥3😢3

1 Mar 2026, 07:38 UTC≈1,110 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Главный вопрос дня, конечно, в том, почему в браузере (просмотровщике) Internet (Интернет) Explorer (Исследователь) 5.0 задизейблен (отключен) пункт Edit (Редактировать)?

😁252

28 Feb 2026, 14:18 UTC946 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Берём?

  1. Конечно61%
  2. Ну нет39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁41

28 Feb 2026, 14:16 UTC854 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в интернете нашлась уникальная скидка для людей с невероятным горизонтом планирования: пожизненный доступ к ИИ-генератору голоса на основе GPT4o на целых 37,5 лет вместо 125!

😁15

27 Feb 2026, 17:56 UTC630 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Смотрите, как теперь можно в CSS!

2

27 Feb 2026, 17:56 UTC776 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cssbolPhoto

Статья «Восхитительный Range Syntax в CSS» Помните сĸазĸу про мальчиĸа, ĸоторый ĸричал «волĸи»? Примерно таĸ же в 2025 году случилось с «программированием на CSS». Вышла фунĸция if() . Блогеры преждевременно хайпанули: всё, теперь у нас условия в CSS. Разработчиĸи пошли читать специфиĸации, попробовали — и довольно быстро выяснилось, что внутри условного выражения style() возможностей почти нет. Многие разочаровалис

🔥21

20 Feb 2026, 10:11 UTC894 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какую ещё возможность PowerPoint стоит регионально заблокировать?

  1. Сохранение файлов14%
  2. Показ чётных слайдов19%
  3. Отображение согласных русских букв28%
  4. Панель «Вставка»11%
  5. Шрифт Calibri28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁13🔥9

20 Feb 2026, 10:05 UTC856 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот так живёшь-живёшь, а потом Power Point не даёт экспортировать презентацию в PDF, потому что находишься не в том регионе.

😢22😁9

19 Feb 2026, 11:12 UTC837 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

А давайте, что уж там, мы же тут просто так нанимались за тебя в опросы тыкать

  1. Решка49%
  2. Орёл51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁171

19 Feb 2026, 11:12 UTC795 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тут такое дело, надо кое-что решить, давайте подкинем монетку

😁62

18 Feb 2026, 11:11 UTC934 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Спасибо, блин, так и запишем

😁212

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @html_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Feb 2026, 14:18 UTCAnonymous Poll108 voters

Берём?

  1. Конечно61%
  2. Ну нет39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Feb 2026, 10:11 UTCAnonymous Poll190 voters

Какую ещё возможность PowerPoint стоит регионально заблокировать?

  1. Сохранение файлов14%
  2. Показ чётных слайдов19%
  3. Отображение согласных русских букв28%
  4. Панель «Вставка»11%
  5. Шрифт Calibri28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Feb 2026, 11:12 UTCAnonymous Poll224 voters

А давайте, что уж там, мы же тут просто так нанимались за тебя в опросы тыкать

  1. Решка49%
  2. Орёл51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Feb 2026, 11:05 UTCAnonymous Poll311 voters

Новая аббревиатура для HTML

  1. ХТМЛ37%
  2. ГЯРД3%
  3. ЯГРД4%
  4. РДСПГЯ3%
  5. НЯП4%
  6. ООО НКО ОКВЭД ГИС БДТ49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Feb 2026, 11:13 UTCAnonymous Poll251 voters

Я и «Доктайп»

  1. Я понимаю, что значит слово «Доктайп»24%
  2. Я не понимаю, что значит слово «Доктайп»13%
  3. Я предлагаю переименовать канал в «Байткод»4%
  4. Я не знаю, что такое «Байткод»5%
  5. И это всё равно не поможет12%
  6. Что ты как этот-то вообще17%
  7. Смирись25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 1 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктайп” (@html_blog), 3,258 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/html_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.