测机器人
❤12🌚5🗿3👀2💘1😱1

Channel
@hougexiaowo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,437subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002263541735 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hougexiaowo |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hougexiaowo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 2,437 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 2,437 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2,329 reactions across 19 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 651 | 28.0% | |
| ❤ | 546 | 23.4% | |
| 💩 | 312 | 13.4% | |
| 🤡 | 179 | 7.69% | |
| 👍 | 178 | 7.64% | |
| 🖕 | 116 | 4.98% | |
| 🙊 | 44 | 1.89% | |
| 🤮 | 37 | 1.59% | |
| 🌚 | 36 | 1.55% | |
| 🍾 | 33 | 1.42% | |
| 💘 | 27 | 1.16% | |
| 🙉 | 25 | 1.07% | |
| 🤬 | 23 | 0.988% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 0.902% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 0.773% | |
| 👀 | 16 | 0.687% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 0.687% | |
| 🤔 | 15 | 0.644% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 0.472% | |
| 😈 | 9 | 0.386% | |
| 7 further kinds | 16 | 0.687% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,329reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2025 to 9 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
测机器人
❤12🌚5🗿3👀2💘1😱1
🧧 猴哥 发送了一个红包 💵总金额:1 USDT💰 剩余:0/100 🥇 0.01(07:30:24) 💰 - 引流擦爆 🥈 0.01(06:30:52) 💰 - 抹妖娆 🥉 0.01(06:30:52) 💰 - 薄情° 🧧 0.01(06:31:00) 💰 - 青龙🐉军团草... 🧧 0.01(06:31:00) 💰 - 青莲白雾 🧧 0.01(06:31:05) 💰 - 時光在唱歌 🧧 0.01(06:31:05) 💰 - 终沦为老生常... 🧧 0.01(06:31:05) 💰 - 尼基 🧧 0.01(08:06:44) 💰 - 极八 喵~~... 🧧 0.01(06:30:49) 💰 - 细腻 🧧 0.01(07:30:45) 💰 - 奺稚 🧧 0.01(07:38:47) 💰 - {FUBOY... 🧧 0.01(07:39:35) 💰 - 至晨 🧧 0.01(07:49:44) 💰 - 青山 🧧 0.01(07:5
❤5🤮5👍3👎1
半夜有美工吗
❤3
🧧 猴哥 发送了一个红包 💵 总金额:200 USDT,剩余:14/128 🥇3.37 USDT - 张正欢 🥈3.23 USDT - 阿义 🥉3.14 USDT - 财财财 🧧3.14 USDT - 喜歡 🧧3.04 USDT - 克罗斯 🧧3.03 USDT - coco 🧧3.01 USDT - 燃心 🧧2.99 USDT - 十一 🧧2.96 USDT - 妞妞牛牛 🧧2.93 USDT - 沈幼楚 🧧2.93 USDT - KKDD 🧧2.83 USDT - 宇文泡 「代开会员」 🧧2.81 USDT - 幻想 🧧2.8 USDT - 曲亦止 🧧2.68 USDT - 啊伟 🧧2.68 USDT - 小缘 🎀 🧧2.67 USDT - 盘兴 🧧2.66 USDT - 酷酷 🧧2.64 USDT - 心安 🧧2.63 USDT - 大佛
❤27💩20
@futanghui 招管理 2000u 永久 限10个 10个后4000u 每3小时可以一次广告 给头衔
👎11🤡6👍2🤬1
马上开始抽彩金😆 先注册好
🤡45❤17👎16😁3🤓1🦄1
@futanghui 与天才交易员分家了 现在是一万人活人业务交流群!各种资源 做各种业务的都有
支持猴哥,引流,只要发了红包解锁就没问题!🏋️♀️🏋️♀️🏋️♀️发了3000人民币也不少了!
👎29👍10🤬6❤5🤣3🖕2
解锁了 前20有进 富豪割20u的 找我报销
❤53👎38👍16🖕6🤮5😁4
🧧 猴哥 发送了一个红包 💵总金额:1588 CNY💰 剩余:0/200 🥇 20.00(22:45:22) CNY💰 - 雪 🥈 15.63(22:45:42) CNY💰 - 蔡徐坤 🥉 15.61(22:45:40) CNY💰 - 云间小卖部 🧧 15.56(22:45:42) CNY💰 - 不信 🧧 15.53(22:45:38) CNY💰 - 𝓱𝒐𝓷𝓰 🧧 15.48(22:45:41) CNY💰 - 𝘽𝙅(拒绝充... 🧧 15.48(22:45:42) CNY💰 - 戏子Re 🧧 15.40(22:45:40) CNY💰 - 北 🧧 15.39(22:45:37) CNY💰 - 虎头 🧧 15.22(22:45:39) CNY💰 - 九 🧧 15.12(22:45:39) CNY💰 - 小妹 🧧 15.03(22:45:41) CNY💰 - qi7【客服... 🧧 14.93(22:45:37) CNY💰 - A.…
👎143❤131💩78🖕54🤡35🤮23🍾19👍18
🧧 猴哥 发送了一个红包 💵总金额:1588 CNY💰 剩余:0/300 🥇 13.72(22:45:13) CNY💰 - 刘灵雨 🥈 12.05(22:45:13) CNY💰 - 雪儿 🥉 10.89(22:45:14) CNY💰 - Jay... 🧧 10.44(22:45:19) CNY💰 - cindy ... 🧧 10.43(22:45:18) CNY💰 - 必发 🧧 10.29(22:45:25) CNY💰 - 芝麻开门 🧧 10.21(22:45:15) CNY💰 - 吉祥日 🧧 10.20(22:45:28) CNY💰 - 4321-老... 🧧 10.17(22:45:19) CNY💰 - 空白 🧧 10.11(22:45:26) CNY💰 - 十七@idi... 🧧 10.08(22:45:18) CNY💰 - 梵17 🧧 10.04(22:45:20) CNY💰 - 啊凯 🧧 10.01(22:45…
❤157👎151💩81🖕48🙊37🙉20🌚19👍19
很久没发红包了。。今天发个大的😆😆
👍70👎32❤17🤡14🙊7👏5💩5🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hougexiaowo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,171,063 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hougexiaowo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“猴哥的小窝” (@hougexiaowo), 2,437 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hougexiaowo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.