Channel
@hfdhdhfhdhdhd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,429subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004365939170 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hfdhdhfhdhdhd |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 2 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hfdhdhfhdhdhd |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 15:22 | 1,429 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 September 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,128 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
老师：小宝 @xiobsd #普陀 评分：9分 评价：人照8分，是真的嫩不是美颜。口活一绝，不是单纯的嫩妹三件套，微m倾向，很骚很润。唯一的问题是老师人很瘦，bbw爱好者可能需要考虑，其余全是好评 点击此处查看详细资料 反馈人：齐 qi 魔都探花男群：https://t.me/+mhw016G0xDo0ZWI1
❤3
小宝07白纯 pinned a photo
🎰 普陀大胸【小宝】@xiobsd 福利🧧 📮 参与条件 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会备用群 🎫 加入-小宝07白纯 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会交流群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 10 条 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会总榜单 🎫 加入-上海艺术展（中转平台） 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会报告区2.0 🎁 奖品名单 💰️ 现金红包🧧18 × 3 📜 抽奖说明 中奖截图发给老师 @xiobsd 红包🧧24小时内有效 【小宝】个人资料：⬇️ https://t.me/yishuzhanlanhui/36212 📆 开奖时间 • 北京时间 2026-11-14 16:42
平时嘻嘻哈哈的操男人的时候老有劲儿了
❤1
小宝 真的是超乎你的想象 口活很好 很舒服第一次在嫩妹身上碰到这么好口活的！关键服务很好 相信我来了绝不后悔！
我要法死你们这些骚男🤭
❤3
老师：小宝 @xiobsd 评分：9.5分 评价：到地方后付好水费，进入浴室 ls 陪洗、水中萧，洗好后选好衣服，开始三点口，口无齿感很好，69 了一会儿，自己戴上链子，开始女上，然后后入、cjs，最后累了再女上出货，会主动舌吻，过程中主动要求用力揉胸，微 m，ls 颜值很高，态度很好，有机会下次复刷。 点击此处查看详细资料 反馈人：匿名 魔都探花男群：https://t.me/+mhw016G0xDo0ZWI1
匿名报告 @xiobsd 一个可爱的小狗狗老师，眉目含春，媚眼如丝，会主动邀请我掐着脖子撒欢。如果说有什么不足，就是头像远不如真人好看。真人真的是细枝硕果，年轻养眼，刚看到就直接硬了，有机会会再刷 标签： @xiobsd #小宝 900p #普陀 #大胸 点击跳转原始报告【需先加群】 反馈狼友: 匿名狼友 时间:2026-10-30 19:25:44 报告ID:21535 当前进度:1/19
https://t.me/jiangnanlu1/25598?single
上海艺术展览会报告模板： https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 【体验评分】：10 【人照几成】：10 【验证留名】：@juanjuana0 【验证时间】：2026.10.28 【妹子艺名】：小宝 【联系方式】：@xiobsd 【上课水费】：900/P 【位置环境】：安全，离地铁近 【罩杯手感】：真c+ 【身材描述】：细枝结硕果 【服务类型】：配合听话 【服务态度】：温柔乖巧 【屌感紧度】：紧 【个人总结】：二刷小宝老师，老师是个很温柔、很可爱的女孩子，小妹妹有点点瘦了，但身材还是很好，还是像以前一样热情，先是一起洗澡，过程都很配合，就像是可爱的小女朋友，老师是个性格很好的人，其实还是个小女孩，望各位温柔，毕竟愿意温柔待人的女孩子不多，要好好保护，请各位小狼都轻轻的，勿桩
老师：小宝 @xiobsd 评分：9分 评价：@xiobsd 小宝很久没见了， 这次碰见大变样， 瘦了20多斤，但是胸没怎么变小，变细支硕果了，大c熊，细胳膊细腿，人工白虎， bb还是粉嫩又小干干净净，服务做爱依旧在线，插入紧致，这个价位这个服务大胸嫩妹非常值， 还会继续复刷 点击此处查看详细资料 反馈人：吾妻善逸 魔都探花男群：https://t.me/+mhw016G0xDo0ZWI1
❤1
细枝结硕果，最近变瘦了、但是奶子没瘦😝谁还不是小腰精
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hfdhdhfhdhdhd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小宝07白纯” (@hfdhdhfhdhdhd), 1,429 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hfdhdhfhdhdhd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.