9 measurements spanning 19 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,971–3,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 09:32
2,976
-4
23 Aug 2026, 16:03
2,980
-6
20 Aug 2026, 11:23
2,986
-12
17 Aug 2026, 10:15
2,998
+5
14 Aug 2026, 03:37
2,993
-11
10 Aug 2026, 11:51
3,004
-5
7 Aug 2026, 15:15
3,009
+2
7 Aug 2026, 09:01
3,007
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:56
3,007
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 2,976 subscribers
Avg views / post
428
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
6 (2 August 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
2,565
Reactions total
138
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
138 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5244526106345752676
47
34.1%
custom 5350689378551216087
33
23.9%
custom 5298624135721665340
29
21.0%
custom 5456326478608230381
29
21.0%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @heydaniya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мы с детства учимся подавлять свое «хочу»
Делать то, что надо, а не то, что требует душа
И таким образом контакт с собой нарушается, снижается чувствительность к своим желаниями, и не хочется уже ничего🤷🏻♀️
А ведь так важно услышать этот импульс и сделать. Даже если рациональное (или чаще просто предрассудки) говорят «нет».
Важно, что это не про инфантилизм – «буду делать только то, что хочу». Есть вещи, которые…
Доброго вечера, мои светлячки🕯️
Надеюсь, ваш день прошел замечательно! Время для рефлексии♥️
Я вот только выхожу к вам под вечер, весь день просидела за рабочим столом, провела 6 сессий, весьма довольна работой!
Сейчас планирую выйти прогуляться и подышать свежим воздухом, а то постепенно лето проходит, ловим каждую минутку тепла!
Клиенты на сессиях уже говорят, как сильно ждут интенсив по созданию внутренней опо…
Mood сегодняшнего выходного дня: муж уехал на корпоратив, а значит тетя учительница может поработать👩🏻🏫
Записала уроки 2 дня на интенсив. Ну что за красота и глубина получается! Весь 2 день про бессознательное: работа с тенью, анима и анимус, нарциссическая уязвимость, лучшие терапевтические техники😍
Я в восторге, какая получается программа!
В канал предзаписи на интенсив выложу небольшую часть урока про тень, та…
Здравствуйте, мои замечательные💕
Я к вам с напоминанием, что даже если сейчас вы находитесь в сложных чувствах, непростом периоде или просто не в настроении
У вас точно есть ресурсы, чтобы с этим справиться. Иначе вы бы не попали в эту ситуацию, она была бы вам просто не по силам🤷🏻♀️
Возьмите эту силу, заметьте ресурсы и сделайте эту ситуацию точкой вашего роста. Я в вас верю!🤞🏼
Купила для своей внутренней малышки Даниюшки раскраску «Чародейки»
Это был мой любимый мультик в детстве! Вообще, все про волшебство и магию я обожала🪄
Между прочим, через анализ любимых героев мультиков/сказок/фильмов можно очень многое узнать о вашем жизненном сценарии и незакрытых потребностях, сильных качествах
Например, моя любимица из Чародеек была Вилл. И в целом, во всех сериалах/мультиках мне всегда нрави…
ЗАВТРА БОЛЬШЕ НЕЛЬЗЯ БУДЕТ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ❌
Как я и говорила, канал предзаписи со всеми полезностями, будет закрыт
Сейчас последняя возможность вступить, чтобы получать бесплатные полезные материалы на тему внутренней опоры и самоценности, а также первыми присоединиться к интенсиву по лучшей цене
Что вас ждет на канале, если успеете подписаться:
- Конспект про Аниму и Анимус, как мужская часть влияет на ваши …
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @heydaniya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вания Маркович | «Симург» @vaniamarkovich · 47,302 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дания ♥️ Об Отношениях” (@heydaniya), 2,976 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heydaniya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
