Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Steh auf![18+]

Channel

Steh auf![18+]

@herr_herrera

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,094subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002003409898
TypeChannel
Username@herr_herrera
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/herr_herrera

Growth

3,0943,1073,100.59 August 2026 — 3,107 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,107 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,098 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,094 subscribers9 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,092–3,109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:493,094-4
12 Aug 2026, 18:033,098-9
9 Aug 2026, 11:513,107no change
9 Aug 2026, 11:163,107first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 4 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.7%
avg views ÷ 3,094 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held15 (4 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total8,610
Reactions total1,281
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,359 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,63937.6%
❤‍🔥1,26529.0%
🍓57013.1%
💘2054.70%
🔥1844.22%
💋1503.44%
custom 52201234293147762531232.82%
custom 51927933240496875681222.80%
🕊571.31%
custom 5262918779804874827441.01%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,359reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 15 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @herr_herrera. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC≈1,070 views326 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

[Герберт]

198custom 522012342931477625378❤‍🔥50

4 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC≈1,190 views148 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟🕊прайс лист ₽🕊🌟 Этот прайс лист для оплаты ₽, так же для людей из снг. Так сказать бонусное предложение для тех у кого батя свалил из семьи по своим делам. Правила действуют те же что и в базовом прайс листе. 🐛Писать сюда - @herrherrera

91custom 522012342931477625340custom 526291877980487482717

4 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,220 views67 reactionsread 9 August 2026

У меня кстати Пейпал теперь есть так что кто давно хотел, но не мог…

❤‍🔥4712custom 51927933240496875688

28 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,400 views173 reactionsread 9 August 2026

кто нибудь едет на фестиваль средневековья в Выборге чисто интересно 👀

custom 5192793324049687568114🍓34custom 526291877980487482725

27 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC≈2,730 views567 reactions6 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

леджендери ловеерс 👀

378🍓117🔥72

3 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC≈3,630 views377 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

[лор] концепт для отдельного вида, внешне схожего с птицей и драконом. Думаю можно понять кем я вдохновлялся 🥺

❤‍🔥251🍓74🔥52

23 Jun 2026, 09:22 UTC≈4,270 views60 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://t.me/boost/herr_herrera дайте бустик пже я опять красный🥺

53custom 52201234293147762535custom 52629187798048748272

23 Jun 2026, 09:17 UTC≈3,800 views175 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Price list €,$ 🌟 _Обновление_ 🌟🌟🌟 ❤️‍🔥Оплата: PayPal, Hipolink, Boosty, Юmoney ❤️‍🔥написать сюда — @herrherrera 🤩Скидка (большая!) при оплате ₽ 🌟 Что НЕ рисую: Дети, Подростки, Зоо. Что рисую: Все остальное, включая nsfw. Дедлайн - 1 месяц. Предоплата - 100% Небольшие исправления бесплатно, но лучше всего согласовать все заранее. 🌟 Выкладываю итоговый рисунок с вашего разрешения.

122❤‍🔥31🔥22

7 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC≈4,370 views156 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026

эти концепты это они если что. 🤪

105❤‍🔥30🔥21

7 Jun 2026, 13:24 UTC≈4,380 views439 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ещёёё ггшка романа 👍👍 люблю его он сучка лютая ( я забыл написать ему крутые буквы про характер, но мне лень)

293🍓87💘59

28 May 2026, 21:13 UTC≈6,450 views468 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вместо мягкой игрушки в постели моей… 😉😉😉 Гиф для Родиончика

312❤‍🔥86💋70

27 May 2026, 19:14 UTC≈5,200 views126 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Новый щитпост👍 тык

❤‍🔥8326🔥17

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @herr_herrera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,111,695 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Steh auf![18+]” (@herr_herrera), 3,094 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/herr_herrera.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.