Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for heaven.com

Channel

heaven.com

@heavencccomm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,944subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001947770796
TypeChannel
Username@heavencccomm
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/heavencccomm

Growth

4,9444,9784,9617 August 2026 — 4,978 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,978 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,977 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,970 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,958 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,956 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,951 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,948 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,945 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,944 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 21 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,939–4,983 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 01:474,944-1
26 Aug 2026, 05:574,945-3
22 Aug 2026, 23:494,948-3
19 Aug 2026, 15:574,951-5
16 Aug 2026, 19:064,956-2
13 Aug 2026, 07:054,958-12
10 Aug 2026, 14:244,970-7
7 Aug 2026, 19:204,977-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:174,978no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:074,978first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

226 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5366324498322714494226100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC≈1,510 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 536632449832271449439

9 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈3,360 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 536632449832271449456

2 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC≈2,350 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

тут вы можете наблюдать базовую ситуацию мироздания : 907 и 1 ебаный нпс

custom 536632449832271449433

2 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTC≈1,950 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

все вокруг вымысел и неправда я не знаю есть ли хоть одна живая душа сейчас

custom 536632449832271449436

29 Jun 2026, 14:55 UTC≈2,060 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

обычная и ночная маска от отеков, капсульный крем, у меня именно такие, желтый для сияния кожи, тоже с медикубом использую на бустер режиме, розовый от старения и тд и гель для медикуба. вроде все. мне помогло все это

custom 536632449832271449434

29 Jun 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,670 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

для лица. у меня никогда не было никаких высыпаний, раздражений, расширенных пор и подобного, я всю свою жизнь смывала мейк влажной салфеткой, в душе гелем для душа рандомным или мылом или вообще засыпала с ним из-за лени, на все это мне всегда было все равно так как единственная моя проблема это тусклый тон кожи и темные круги под глазами. мне захотелось это исправить, потому что сейчас я очень редко крашусь из-за о

custom 536632449832271449428

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @heavencccomm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

millkovv
@millkovvloveu · 43,899
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 28 August 2026
chikulya
@chikylyaaa · 63,347
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“heaven.com” (@heavencccomm), 4,944 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heavencccomm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.