Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال خبری حاشیه24

Channel

کانال خبری حاشیه24

@hashie24

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,100subscribers

-1,374 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001003318985
TypeChannel
Username@hashie24
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hashie24

Growth

5,1006,4745,7875 August 2026 — 6,474 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,474 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,439 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,361 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,276 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,990 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,917 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,526 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,100 subscribers5 August 202625 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net -1,374. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,894–6,680 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 05:285,100-426
22 Aug 2026, 10:075,526-391
19 Aug 2026, 07:165,917-73
16 Aug 2026, 17:345,990-286
12 Aug 2026, 19:346,276-85
10 Aug 2026, 01:126,361-78
6 Aug 2026, 20:486,439-35
6 Aug 2026, 03:206,474no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:236,474first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 5,100 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total2,042
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 09s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

286 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬8529.7%
👏4816.8%
👍4716.4%
👎3010.5%
🥴289.79%
👌227.69%
155.24%
😭51.75%
🕊20.699%
😍20.699%
🤯20.699%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC792 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

نسل ⁧میلیاردرهای فقیر ⁩؛ ‏ثروت روی کاغذ، فقر در زندگی. ‏https://t.me/+O81uyTRbjP5ZVqMs

🤬7😭51

30 Jul 2026, 21:35 UTC≈1,250 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎥نقدعلی، نماینده مجلس: یک نماینده به من گفت از درد بی حجابی در خانه گریه می‌کند! 🔸با وضعیت حجاب می‌خواهیم چه کنیم؟ جوابی برای خدا نداریم https://t.me/+O81uyTRbjP5ZVqMs

🤬23👎10👍1🤯1

14 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC≈2,130 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎥 ۵ صبح می‌دوم، اما نه برای اداش... 🎞️ چون مجبورم!/ دشواری‌های عجیب هاجر دباغی برای گرفتن چمن مصنوعی در اصفهان؛ همین را بدهند، چمن طبیعی پیشکش https://t.me/+O81uyTRbjP5ZVqMs

7🕊1🤯1

12 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC≈2,160 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

یک کاربر در واکنش به اظهارات خضریان و مجری صداو سیما: سالهاست سرنوشت ملت مظلوم ایران با پوزخند اراذل و اوباش رانتی گره خورده 🔸 این فقر و فساد گسترده حاصل پوزخند عده ای لمپن بیسواده که زیست مردم را‌ در کشوری ثروتمند به گروگان گرفته. https://t.me/+O81uyTRbjP5ZVqMs

👏20👎21🕊1

2 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,410 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

‏🎥 تو دهنی رشیدی کوچی به پایداریها : چرا اینها را دستگیر نمیکنند؟ ‎ https://t.me/+O81uyTRbjP5ZVqMs

👏21👎4🥴1

2 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC≈2,140 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⭕️ مداح پاکتی؛ از نوحه‌خوانی تا توهم نظریه‌پردازی 🔸بعضی مداح‌ها وقتی بیش از حد باد می‌شوند، دچار توهم جایگاه می‌شوند؛ فکر می‌کنند چون چند شب پشت میکروفن نوحه خوانده‌اند، حالا تئوریسین دین و سیاست‌اند. 🔸آقای مداح! نهایت جایگاه تو این است که نوحه‌ات را بخوانی، نه اینکه در قامت فقیه، عالم دینی یا نظریه‌پرداز برای جامعه نسخه بپیچی. مداح، مرجع تشخیص نیست؛ مداح، صاحب نظریه نیست؛ میکروفن هم سند اجتهاد نمی‌شود. 🔸جامعه امر

👌18👍3👎21

30 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,880 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎥بخش سانسور شده صحبت‌های قالیباف در صداوسیما 🔹صداوسیما بدون هیچ توضیحی گفتگوی ضبط شده رییس مجلس و رییس تیم مذاکره کننده ایران را در نقطه توضیح بابت نحوه آزادسازی اموال ایران قطع کرد. 🔹رییس مجلس در قسمت پخش نشده این سوال می پرسد خریدهای قبلی این اقلام که در طول ۱۵ سال گذشته انجام می‌شده، از کجا بوده؟ آیا ال‌سی اینها در لندن باز می شد یا نه؟ چرا الان مهم شد و این حرف‌ها را میزنند؟ 🔹چون نمی‌خواهند بپذیرند با مجوز اوف

🤬7🥴2👍1

30 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,480 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️ سرپرست تیم مذاکره کننده اندازه مجریان بی‌مصرف صدا و سیما مجال صحبت کردن با مردم پیدا نمی‌کند! https://t.me/+O81uyTRbjP5ZVqMs

👍10👎1🥴1

30 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,540 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⭕️عصبانیت صداوسیما از افشاگری قالیباف درمورد توافق خاص دولت قبل با آمریکا 🔹صداوسیما زمانی مصاحبه قالیباف را قطع کرد که او در حال اشاره به توافق ناکام با آمریکا برای انتقال ۶ میلیارد دلار پول ایران از کره به قطر برای مصارف بشردوستانه (غذا و دارو) بود. https://t.me/+O81uyTRbjP5ZVqMs

🤬3🥴2

30 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,600 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️ از یک طرف هر شب مخالفین مذاکره آنتن زنده را اشغال میکنند از طرف دیگه در بدعتی جدید صحبت های رییس هیئت مذاکره را قطع میکنند؛ رسانه ملیست یا رسانه فرقه پایداری؟! https://t.me/+O81uyTRbjP5ZVqMs

🤬7🥴3

30 Jun 2026, 21:17 UTC≈1,330 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⭕️ صداوسیما با قطع برنامه گزارش قالیباف درباره اجرای بندهای تفاهم، به‌جای فراهم کردن بستر پاسخ‌گویی، مانع آن شد روزنامه خراسان: 🔹قالیباف اگر سکوت کند، متهم می‌شود به پنهان‌کاری، اگر بخواهد گزارش دهد، صداوسیما ترمز پخش را می‌کشد. صداوسیما باید روشن بگوید، از گزارش قالیباف می‌ترسد یا از روشن شدن واقعیت تفاهم؟ https://t.me/+O81uyTRbjP5ZVqMs

🥴6👍3👎1

30 Jun 2026, 08:22 UTC≈1,420 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️ با شکایت ایران خودرو، تفاهم بین استان‌های ساحلی و شمال غرب برای تردد خودروهای پلاک منطقه آزاد ملغی شد. #مافیا https://t.me/+O81uyTRbjP5ZVqMs

🤬13👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hashie24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 519,555 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال خبری حاشیه24” (@hashie24), 5,100 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hashie24.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.