金边上演“古惑仔”场面,青年持刀棍街头混战 10月19日凌晨,金边市堆谷区271路沿线一处加油站附近发生一起青年群体持械斗殴事件。现场聚集50多辆摩托车,多名青年持刀棍追逐、打砸,场面混乱,犹如电影中的“古惑仔”场景。 据现场流传的视频显示,涉事人员包括男女青年,部分人员手持刀具、棍棒及摩托车头盔,在加油站附近相互追逐,双方冲突激烈。 冲突过程中,多名青年挥舞刀棍,不仅追逐对方,还对现场摩托车进行猛烈打砸。有人持棍连续击打摩托车,也有人手持头盔参与攻击,现场一度陷入混乱。 视频还显示,一辆白色摩托车倒在地上,周围散落着部分物品。有人四处奔跑躲避,也有人继续追逐、打砸,场面令人心惊。 此次事件再次引发外界对青少年聚众斗殴及夜间治安问题的关注。尤其是冲突发生在加油站附近,多人持械追逐、打砸摩托车的行为,不仅扰乱公共秩序,也可能危及周边民众安全。 事实上,柬埔寨政府此前已多次针对不良青年聚众斗殴、持械滋事等问题作出强硬表态…

Channel
亚美尼亚-东南亚-新闻头条
@gtxwxz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
107,651subscribers
+57,118 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003211914483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gtxwxz |
| Description | 商务: @sjr555 #亚美尼亚 #东南亚 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 42 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gtxwxz |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 107,651 | -106 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 107,757 | -63 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:09 | 107,820 | -69 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 107,889 | -143 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:28 | 108,032 | -195 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 02:01 | 108,227 | -224 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 108,451 | -357 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 02:01 | 108,808 | -600 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 19:35 | 109,408 | +9,292 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 100,116 | -3,523 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 103,639 | -1,156 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 104,795 | -1,235 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 106,030 | -1,156 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 107,186 | -1,566 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 108,752 | -2,405 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 111,157 | -1,348 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 112,505 | +75,628 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:04 | 36,877 | -599 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:15 | 37,476 | -840 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 38,316 | first reading |
Engagement
560 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 152 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.39%
- avg views ÷ 107,651 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,490
- 245 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.131%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 245
- of 560 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 245 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 560 (6 August 2026 – 19 October 2026) |
| Views total | 365,309 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Oct 2026, 21:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,200
- Videos
- ≈32
- Links
- ≈202
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 38s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,462 reactions across 91 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.46% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 233 | 9.46% | |
| 🍌 | 225 | 9.14% | |
| 💔 | 224 | 9.10% | |
| 💩 | 218 | 8.85% | |
| 🥱 | 218 | 8.85% | |
| 😡 | 214 | 8.69% | |
| 😈 | 212 | 8.61% | |
| 🤮 | 209 | 8.49% | |
| 🤬 | 204 | 8.29% | |
| 🖕 | 192 | 7.80% | |
| 👎 | 191 | 7.76% | |
| 🥰 | 20 | 0.812% | |
| 🎉 | 17 | 0.69% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 0.69% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 0.609% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 0.528% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 0.528% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 0.487% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 0.325% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 0.284% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 560 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,462 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 560 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
此人代号“林耀东”,在特区九洲集团担任总监,后来因为原来的老板回国被抓,他升成了分公司负责人,是2001年出生的。 后来听说国内公安准备到特区抓他,集团提前收到风声,安排他搬去了缅甸妙瓦底KK园区。 这个人在特区的信誉一直很差。早些年赶上了一波红利,业绩做得还不错。自从当上负责人,年纪轻轻赚了点钱,就开始膨胀,在特区各种高消费,包厢里花钱也特别大手大脚。后来输了不少钱,入不敷出,就开始到处借钱。至于有没有借钱不还、骗钱的情况,特区那些找他的人应该最清楚。 搬到妙瓦底KK园区之后,你又坑了多少老家人?有代理线做出了几百万U的业绩,最后一分钱都没分到。你却一直对外说,是九洲集团老板没有给你钱。 但我多方打听后了解到的情况,根本不是这么回事。集团当初出钱投资你、扶持你,听说公安要去特区抓你,还帮你搬去了妙瓦底。结果你却伙同管理人员,把客户的U转进自己的私人钱包。后来事情暴露,集团才慢慢安排其他人接手你的公司。 KK园区遭到扫…
2026年10月19日,随着中国经济仍在从疫情中艰难复苏,消费者转向二手市场或本土新锐品牌,全球时尚巨头在华销售承压。过去两年路易威登在中国大陆关闭五家门店,老佛爷百货5月关闭北京旗舰店。贝恩公司数据显示,2025年中国大陆个人奢侈品市场继2024年暴跌19%后再度收缩3%至5%,而二手奢侈品市场同年增长15%至20%。国内咨询机构预计2025年二手奢侈品总销售额达384亿元人民币,到2030年有望突破1000亿元。
柬埔寨部分警员被指借接触中国企业主之机索取钱财 据有关人士反映,柬埔寨部分警务人员频繁寻求与大型中资企业负责人会面,疑似希望借此获取经济利益。 有消息称,个别人员甚至以执法、调查或其他公务名义接近外国公民,涉嫌索取钱财。 目前,相关指控尚未得到官方证实。希望柬埔寨有关部门重视并展开调查,依法查处可能存在的敲诈勒索及滥用职权行为,切实保护外国投资者和在柬外国公民的合法权益。
泰国乌隆府一处卫生站项目未完工,却已全额提款。府尹已下令彻查,并表示违规将多维度追责。卫生站是基层医疗服务的重要设施,项目未完工意味着当地居民无法及时获得诊疗服务,而全额提款则意味着公共资金已按“完工”标准支付。这中间可能存在:工程进度核验失职、付款审批流于形式、施工方虚报进度、监理方未履职,甚至涉及利益输送与腐败。追责若只停留在施工方,而不触及审批与监管环节,问题可能重演。
菲律宾国家警察总监纳塔特兹表示,已指示各警察分局指挥官与地方政府单位合作,识别可疑场所并监控可能参与非法离岸博彩的外国人。他指出,博彩运营商可能借合法业务名义恢复运营,警方与地方官员需加强检查、监控和信息共享。纳塔特兹还下令调查人员尽快分析上周在马卡蒂一处博彩中心查获的电脑、手机等电子设备,该行动已逮捕五人,另有三人仍在逃。
斐济奈迪里村村民自2009年起推动在当地传统渔场设立海洋保护区。该保护区从最初的30米乘40米逐步扩建至280米乘240米。村内青年团队自2011年起负责管护禁渔区,仅2023年就栽种1.8万株珊瑚及1万株红树林。经长期养护,保护区内珊瑚生长繁茂,存活数百株耐高温的超级珊瑚,今年更迎来鲨鱼重返该片海域。当地社区依靠本土管护模式修复海洋生态,印证了长期海洋保护行动能够收获显著成效。
全国各省市共有89029个就业岗位,正等待从泰国返回的 former 劳工及求职者。这些岗位集中在农业、工业和服务业等主要领域。该部表示,求职者可通过其发布的就业信息卡,查询联系方式、工厂名称及心仪行业。除直接联系公司、工厂和企业外,求职者还可拨打1297紧急联络系统,请劳动部协助协调就业。
柬埔寨农村发展部长蔡日森带队,前往磅清扬省萨马基棉吉县,实地查看三条因暴雨侵蚀受损的农村道路,现场勘查灾情并安排应急修复工作。 本次受损三条道路里,两条是2015年亚行资助修建的双层沥青路,长度分别为35公里与12.5公里;其中一条箱涵底部被洪水冲毁,另一条受洪水漫灌出现局部损毁。第三条为2018年政府出资建设、全长9.2公里的红色碎石路,有约100米单侧路肩被冲垮。目前三条道路尚可维持单侧通行。 这条碎石路已纳入柬埔寨“气候变化适应型道路建设项目”,后续可获得合作方资金支持进行升级改造。蔡日森现场下达指示,要求部门技术团队联合省、乡两级地方政府,立刻开展受损路段紧急抢修,尽快恢复道路正常通行。
洪森斥责反对派:狗逼,给你脸了是吧? 针对近期反对派在柬泰边境问题上碰瓷柬埔寨总理洪玛奈,护犊心切的柬埔寨参议院主席洪森今天在脸书发帖,斥责反对派为狗。 洪森说,小时候我看狗跟车跑,可怜它便抱它上车,没想它却露出得意的丑态。后来,我就用“狗上了车”来形容那些得势便猖狂、不可一世的人。 “总理这才刚提到他的名字,这个‘坐牢鬼’就摆出了‘狗上了车’一样的丑态,顺杆爬着请求对他本人及其团伙予以赦免。请求赦免,不就意味着承认你自己确实有罪了吗,‘坐牢鬼’?
10月18日,泰国普吉府一名男子自称旅游警察督察,进入当地一家餐厅要求免费用餐遭拒后醉酒闹事,相关视频在社交媒体上引发热议。 称,该男子此前曾多次在普吉府治县多家餐厅和娱乐场所免费消费,部分场所还按月向其缴费。目前相关部门尚未对此事作出正式回应,事件仍在进一步发酵中。
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_8299552211
Showing the 12 most recent of 560 posts we hold for @gtxwxz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“亚美尼亚-东南亚-新闻头条” (@gtxwxz), 107,651 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gtxwxz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.