不是说要是你有85亿要拿80亿给肖战吗? 现在网友知道你没有这个钱但是1000、3000块钱总有吧 让你拿这个钱给肖战刷个dou+你咋还急了去私信骂人呢? 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru

Channel
瓜田日報@peiyee
@gtrb66
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23,679subscribers
-105 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003996085884 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @gtrb66 @peiyee |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gtrb66 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 23,679 | -15 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 23,694 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 23,694 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:25 | 23,700 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 23,700 | -25 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:06 | 23,725 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:03 | 23,728 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 23,738 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 23,740 | -25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 23,765 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 23,765 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 23,775 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 23,775 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 23,779 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 23,782 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 23,784 | first reading |
Engagement
146 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.02%
- avg views ÷ 23,679 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 243
- 146 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 146
- of 146 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 146 (28 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 35,418 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1h 15m
- Average length
- 1m 00s
Measured directly from 75 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
吓的一激灵! 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
牛逼😂😂 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
2026年美国建国250周年纪念唐纳德·J·特朗普1美元硬币今日正式流通 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
睡马路 自杀 ? 祸害真多 #车祸 #碾压 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
摆拍归摆拍,就地取材的创意还行…… 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
#小姐姐哭死 我男朋友说 再和前男友联系,他就告诉我老公,我们四个都别想好过 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
比赛第一,友谊第十四🤣 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
我所有的事情都是硬着头皮上,如果没有头皮,我一事无成,感谢头皮。 我尴尬的时候都是脚趾替我扣地,感谢脚趾。 我所有的事情都是咬着后槽牙过来的,感谢咬肌,感谢后槽牙。 我所有的事情都是火烧眉毛了才来干,感谢眉毛。 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
朴彩英拒绝100亿韩元中国奶茶代言 韩国女团 BLACKPINK 成员兼流行歌手 ROSÉ(罗婕)近年来不受资本诱惑,即便面对百亿韩元级别的广告邀约也会礼貌拒绝,正逐渐确立属于自己的审美标准。 据《韩国先驱报》及韩国歌坛相关消息人士透露,罗婕近日婉拒了一家知名中国茶品牌提出的广告合作,报价约为100亿韩元(约合人民币5500万元)。此外,她与某知名香槟品牌历经近一年的合作洽谈,也因对方提出的、以她名字命名的酒瓶设计未能达到她的审美标准,最终宣告破裂。 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
日本人为什么不接送小孩? 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
主人 800g牛排够吗? 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿:@furru
Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @gtrb66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“瓜田日報@peiyee” (@gtrb66), 23,679 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gtrb66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.