Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 瓜田日报@𝐩𝐞𝐢𝐲𝐞𝐞

Channel

瓜田日报@𝐩𝐞𝐢𝐲𝐞𝐞

@gtrb66

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

23,365subscribers

-419 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003996085884
TypeChannel
Usernames@gtrb66 @peiyee
Description🍉专注每日吃瓜•更新最快 🔥追踪各大平台热门话题 ✍🏻收录最全的吃瓜爆料•热点新闻 💥最新热点黑料 👀满足你的好奇心 ❀ 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐛 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐩𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐧. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐩𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐧-𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐲. ☎️商务合作›@Jvoooo
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 28 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/gtrb66

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,36526,06824,716.528 August 2026 — 23,784 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,782 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,779 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,775 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,775 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,765 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,765 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,740 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,738 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,728 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,725 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,700 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,700 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,694 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,694 subscribers6 September 2026 — 23,679 subscribers7 September 2026 — 23,673 subscribers9 September 2026 — 23,653 subscribers10 September 2026 — 23,523 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,519 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,519 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,527 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,526 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,531 subscribers16 September 2026 — 25,665 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,667 subscribers18 September 2026 — 26,068 subscribers24 September 2026 — 25,556 subscribers27 September 2026 — 25,350 subscribers3 October 2026 — 25,077 subscribers4 October 2026 — 24,821 subscribers8 October 2026 — 24,523 subscribers9 October 2026 — 24,417 subscribers12 October 2026 — 23,641 subscribers13 October 2026 — 23,634 subscribers14 October 2026 — 23,579 subscribers14 October 2026 — 23,581 subscribers15 October 2026 — 23,555 subscribers15 October 2026 — 23,555 subscribers16 October 2026 — 23,503 subscribers16 October 2026 — 23,499 subscribers17 October 2026 — 23,513 subscribers17 October 2026 — 23,513 subscribers18 October 2026 — 23,509 subscribers18 October 2026 — 23,523 subscribers19 October 2026 — 23,510 subscribers19 October 2026 — 23,510 subscribers20 October 2026 — 23,483 subscribers20 October 2026 — 23,475 subscribers21 October 2026 — 23,460 subscribers22 October 2026 — 23,434 subscribers22 October 2026 — 23,409 subscribers23 October 2026 — 23,389 subscribers23 October 2026 — 23,387 subscribers24 October 2026 — 23,365 subscribers28 August 202624 October 2026
55 measurements spanning 57 days, net -419. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,960–26,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 09:1823,365-22
23 Oct 2026, 18:4623,387-2
23 Oct 2026, 06:3623,389-20
22 Oct 2026, 17:3923,409-25
22 Oct 2026, 05:4623,434-26
21 Oct 2026, 11:0123,460-15
20 Oct 2026, 20:5623,475-8
20 Oct 2026, 11:3123,483-27
19 Oct 2026, 16:2623,510no change
19 Oct 2026, 14:0623,510-13
18 Oct 2026, 19:5123,523+14
18 Oct 2026, 12:0423,509-4
17 Oct 2026, 17:0523,513no change
17 Oct 2026, 15:1123,513+14
16 Oct 2026, 19:5823,499-4
16 Oct 2026, 13:5823,503-52
15 Oct 2026, 17:1423,555no change
15 Oct 2026, 11:1823,555-26
14 Oct 2026, 20:3123,581+2
14 Oct 2026, 08:4023,579first reading

Engagement

587 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.16%
avg views ÷ 23,365 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.3
430 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
430
of 587 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 430 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held587 (28 August 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total16,029
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Oct 2026, 13:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,410
Videos
≈6,560
Links
≈46

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 56m
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 336 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 587 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 587 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.36%
8 of 587 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
8
posts carrying an erid · 8 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2.0
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
5.0
over 579 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
109537695115 October 202615 October 2026
168439886114 October 20264 October 2026
689053764315 October 20265 October 2026
7381715899115 October 202615 October 2026
750399914714 October 20264 October 2026
795595981913 October 20263 October 2026
849374092515 October 20265 October 2026
871794019715 October 20265 October 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 587 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 24 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

24 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC1 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

缅甸南坎市诈骗园区增多 10·27军事行动后,南坎市由PSLF/TNLA移交管辖,如今中国诈骗团伙与TNLA合作,大规模涌入并占据地盘。 以下地点均为诈骗园区: 1. 康萨街区F5 KTV旧址(ကောင်းဆာရပ်ရှိ F5 KTV နေရာဟောင်း) 2. 曼纳娱乐厅(မန့်နားဖျော်ဖြေရေးဝိုင်း) 3. 昂梅达街区酒店(အောင်မေတ္တာရပ်ကွက်ရှိ ဟိုတယ်) 4. 德耶贡村TNLA达玛瓦竹林院(သာယာကုန်းရွာရှိ TNLA တားမတ်ဝါးခြံဝင်း) 5. 霍纳村麦尼埃院(ဟိုနားရွာရှိ မိုင်းညီအေး ခြံဝင်း) 此外还有其他尚未能曝光的园区。从外表看难以辨认,以赌场、KTV等其他业务作掩护,TNLA士兵为其提供全面安保。 据可靠的人民消息和民众反映,所谓“打击诈骗行动”实为破坏村镇、从事诈骗业务。ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 关注吃瓜…

24 Oct 2026, 13:26 UTC1 viewsread 24 October 2026
Video

马斯克透露特斯拉工厂去年底有个奇葩,因为工厂里有位女员工,踩到了他的祈祷毯,他就动手打了她,而那位女员工事先并不知道,谁会在工厂地上铺个祈祷毯。 这位老哥被开除后,过了几个月,他跑到该市的一家酒吧,杀了 3 个学生。 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿»@Jvoooo

24 Oct 2026, 13:23 UTC1 viewsread 24 October 2026
Video

#技师 玩的冰火两重天 ? 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿»@Jvoooo

24 Oct 2026, 13:18 UTC1 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

国际刑警组织展开“塞伦盖蒂三号”行动 大肆打击非洲网络犯罪 在国际刑警组织协调下,21国执法机构于2026年6月29日至8月31日联合开展“塞伦盖蒂三号”行动(Operation Serengeti III),重创非洲网络犯罪网络。 行动共逮捕1,462名嫌疑人,摧毁10,909个恶意网络,追回逾1.05亿美元非法资金,涉及受害者超6.5万人,损失达3.85亿美元。其中,乌干达查获涉及跨国投资诈骗的365名外籍人员;安哥拉捣毁2个非法加密货币挖矿中心;尼日利亚则抓获多名涉钓鱼邮件与投资诈骗的骨干。 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿›@Jvoooo

24 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC1 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯:金边警方突查按摩店,涉嫌提供色情服务及雇用未成年少女 10月22日晚,金边市警方反人口贩运与保护未成年人部门联合当地执法人员,对一家涉嫌违规经营的按摩店展开突击检查。 据报道,涉事场所名为“SM Steam and Massage”,位于金边市BKK区95号路与396号路交界处。警方怀疑该店以按摩服务为掩护,暗中提供非法性服务,同时调查其是否涉及雇用未成年少女等问题。 行动期间,执法人员控制了店内多名男女,并将相关工作人员带往金边市警察局接受调查。此次行动由相关部门联合开展,并在司法机关协调下进行。 截至目前,公开报道尚未披露被带走人员的确切人数、国籍及具体身份,案件仍有待进一步调查。有关涉事场所是否存在人口贩运、性剥削或雇用未成年人的违法行为,仍须以警方调查结果及后续司法程序为准。 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿›@Jvoooo

24 Oct 2026, 13:08 UTC1 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

凯迪拉克 车友会? 好骚 ! 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿»@Jvoooo

24 Oct 2026, 12:48 UTC2 viewsread 24 October 2026
Video

04年男友出轨84年小阿姨,难怪女友这么生气 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿»@Jvoooo

24 Oct 2026, 12:47 UTC2 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

汕头澄海区 三桥 网传掉下去十几人😱 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿»@Jvoooo

23 Oct 2026, 18:40 UTC59 viewsread 23 October 2026
Photo

7179421520 8382103028 曝光两个骗子,以上是他们的ID,用户名可以换,ID永远不能换,除非他们换号。 如果各位下次不确定谁是骗子,先在我们频道搜索ID是不是被曝光过,或者私信我询问也可以 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿›@Jvoooo

23 Oct 2026, 14:37 UTC18 viewsread 23 October 2026
Photo

真是好闺蜜,老公都可以分享😍 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿»@Jvoooo

23 Oct 2026, 14:37 UTC13 viewsread 23 October 2026
Video

男子去见网友,结果发现公对公!对方是男扮女装!就打起来了,还没有打过伪娘🤣 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿»@Jvoooo

23 Oct 2026, 14:34 UTC12 viewsread 23 October 2026
Video

上海,男子跳楼生活压力太大 关注吃瓜频道➡️@peiyee 投稿»@Jvoooo

Showing the 12 most recent of 587 posts we hold for @gtrb66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“瓜田日报@𝐩𝐞𝐢𝐲𝐞𝐞” (@gtrb66), 23,365 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gtrb66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.